We previously found that low shear stress (LSS) induces atherosclerotic plaques in mice with increased lipid and matrix metalloproteinase content and decreased vascular smooth muscle and collagen content. Here, we evaluated the role of chemokines in this process, using an extravascular device inducing regions of LSS, high shear stress, and oscillatory shear stress (OSS) in the carotid artery. One week of shear stress alterations induced expression of IFN-γ–inducible protein–10 (IP-10) exclusively in the LSS region, whereas monocyte chemoattractant protein–1 (MCP-1) and the mouse homolog of growth-regulated oncogene α (GRO-α) were equally upregulated in both LSS and OSS regions. After 3 weeks, GRO-α and IP-10 were specifically upregulated in LSS regions. After 9 weeks, lesions with thinner fibrous caps and larger necrotic cores were found in the LSS region compared with the OSS region. Equal levels of MCP-1 expression were observed in both regions, while expression of fractalkine was found in the LSS region only. Blockage of fractalkine inhibited plaque growth and resulted in striking differences in plaque composition in the LSS region. We conclude that LSS or OSS triggers expression of chemokines involved in atherogenesis. Fractalkine upregulation is critically important for the composition of LSS-induced atherosclerotic lesions.
Caroline Cheng, Dennie Tempel, Rien van Haperen, Hetty C. de Boer, Dolf Segers, Martin Huisman, Anton Jan van Zonneveld, Pieter J.M. Leenen, Anton van der Steen, Patrick W. Serruys, Rini de Crom, Rob Krams
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 870 | 46 |
60 | 28 | |
Figure | 435 | 6 |
Supplemental data | 44 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 1,470 | 83 |
Total Views | 1,553 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.