Advertisement
Research ArticleGastroenterology Free access | 10.1172/JCI27821
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Yoshida, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Kobayashi, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Kuo, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Bry, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Glickman, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Claypool, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Kaser, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Nagaishi, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Higgins, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Mizoguchi, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Wakatsuki, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Roopenian, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Mizoguchi, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Lencer, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 2Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5Division of Clinical Bioregulatory Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 6The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. 7Gastrointestinal Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Harvard Digestive Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Find articles by Blumberg, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published August 1, 2006 - More info
The neonatal Fc receptor for IgG (FcRn) plays a major role in regulating host IgG levels and transporting IgG and associated antigens across polarized epithelial barriers. Selective expression of FcRn in the epithelium is shown here to be associated with secretion of IgG into the lumen that allows for defense against an epithelium-associated pathogen (Citrobacter rodentium). This pathway of host resistance to a bacterial pathogen as mediated by FcRn involves retrieval of bacterial antigens from the lumen and initiation of adaptive immune responses in regional lymphoid structures. Epithelial-associated FcRn, through its ability to secrete and absorb IgG, may thus integrate luminal antigen encounters with systemic immune compartments and as such provide essential host defense and immunoregulatory functions at the mucosal surfaces.
Secretory Igs such as IgA, IgM, and IgG that are present in mucosal surfaces potentially provide a first line of defense against microorganisms (1–3). Secretory IgA (sIgA) is well known to be transported across epithelial cells into the lumen through an active unidirectional process by the polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR) (4). In addition to sIgA, significant quantities of IgG can also be secreted into the intestinal lumen of adult humans and rodents. It has been reported that nasal secretions contain 300 μg/ml IgG (4), and approximately 800 μg/ml IgG can be detected in the human rectum (5). Like sIgA, which has been well documented as actively participating in the defense against some pathogens (3, 6), mucosally associated IgG has also been recently suggested to contribute to host defense (1, 2). However, despite all that is known about IgA transport and its relation to mucosal host defense, the role of intestinal luminal IgG in defending against enteric bacteria and the mechanisms by which this is achieved remains to be established.
It has been previously shown that IgG can be transported across intact epithelial barriers through the placenta in humans and neonatal intestine in rodents for the passive transfer of immunity from mother to fetus or into the neonatal host, respectively. The receptor responsible for mediating this transport is the neonatal Fc receptor for IgG (FcRn), a β2-microglobulin–associated (β2m-associated), major histocompatibility complex class I–related molecule that is also responsible for the protection of IgG from catabolism throughout life in the circulation through its expression on endothelia and potentially other cell types (7). It has been recently appreciated that significant levels of FcRn are also constitutively expressed by epithelial cells throughout life in human intestine, lung, and kidney (8, 9). This is in contrast to expression of FcRn in the intestinal epithelia of rodents, which is developmentally regulated — in that FcRn is highly expressed at birth with a dramatic decrease of expression occurring after 2 weeks of life at the time of weaning. The recent identification of FcRn expression in numerous epithelial cell types in humans during adult life and more recently in other mammals such as nonhuman primates (10), together with the recognition that FcRn mediates the bidirectional transport of IgG (from basolateral to apical as well as from apical to basolateral surfaces) in vitro and in vivo across epithelial barriers, has directed attention to other potential extensions of FcRn function in immunity beyond the passive transfer of IgG and the protection of IgG from catabolism (2, 8, 11–13). Specifically, this bidirectional transport of IgG confers a unique ability on FcRn to retrieve intestinal luminal antigens as a complex with IgG and deposit them into the intestinal mucosa, where the antigen/IgG complexes can be captured by DCs for subsequent presentation to CD4+ T cells (2). These properties of FcRn define a unique mechanism by which absorptive epithelia, which covers the majority of the surface of the intestines, can specifically acquire and transport antigens into the lamina propria. Consistent with this, recent studies have indicated that intestinal bacterial antigens are required to direct the maturation of immune responses (14) and that such immune responses are induced throughout the intestine rather than within restricted regions such as Peyer’s patches (15). Therefore, these recent observations have raised a potential possibility that epithelial cell–mediated sampling of luminal bacterial antigens throughout the intestinal surface contributes to the regulation of mucosal and systemic immune responses.
We therefore investigated the role of FcRn within the intestinal epithelia in host defense by examining the response to Citrobacter rodentium. This bacterium is normally restricted in its localization to the epithelium, and its eradication is highly dependent upon CD4+ T cell responses and IgG (16–18). The separation of the antigens associated with this bacterium within the epithelium from the other mucosal and systemic tissues implies that eradication of this organism must require an immunologic pathway that integrates and regulates the function of these compartments. We therefore reasoned that FcRn provides this integrating function by virtue of its transport properties and, in so doing, would confirm a unique role for FcRn in host defense. To confirm this hypothesis, we generated a mouse model in which FcRn is expressed constitutively and solely by intestinal epithelial cells in adult life. Using this mouse model we dissected the biological roles of intestinal epithelial cell–associated FcRn during infection with an epithelial cell–associated pathogen and showed that FcRn participated in the eradication of this pathogen through a pathway that involves its transport functions and ability to direct antigens to inductive sites associated with mucosal tissues.
Establishment of intestine-specific mouse FcRn Tg mice. To study the role of mouse FcRn (mFcRn) in intestinal epithelium in mediating antimicrobial immunity, since the expression of FcRn has been shown to decrease at the time of weaning in rodents (19), we established FcRn Tg mouse lines in which mFcRn and mβ2m were specifically expressed by intestinal epithelial cells (Figure 1A) using the intestinal fatty acid–binding protein gene promoter (IFABP; ref. 20) to create IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg mice (20). We expressed β2m in this manner to ensure that it was not substrate limiting in expression of the FcRn transgene. Two founder lines that expressed FcRn in the epithelium at the highest levels were selected in this study. RT-PCR analysis showed that the Tg lines most strongly expressed FcRn in epithelial cells of the upper and lower intestine and cecum at 6 weeks of age compared with control BALB/c mice, which weakly expressed mFcRn (Figure 1B). In contrast, the levels of mβ2m expression were indistinguishable between Tg and WT mice. These findings are consistent with a decrease in FcRn, but not β2m, expression in mice after weaning. To further confirm the RT-PCR results at the protein level, immunohistochemical analysis was also performed. An increase in FcRn was detected in the epithelial cells of lower small intestine (Figure 1D) and cecum (data not shown) of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg mice compared with WT littermate controls, consistent with the activity of this promoter (Figure 1C) (20). These data indicate that IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg mice express increased FcRn protein as well as mRNA in the epithelium of the small intestine and cecum in adult mice relative to WT littermate controls.
Absence of intestinal luminal IgG in FcRn–/– mice. (A) The construct for the Tg IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg mouse, designed to express mFcRn and mβ2m under the control of the IFABP. (B) Increased mFcRn expression in epithelial cells of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg (Tg) mouse. RNA was extracted from epithelial cells of upper and lower small intestines (USI and LSI, respectively) and cecum in 6-week-old IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg founder BALB/c mice and littermate WT BALB/c mice and subjected to RT-PCR. (C and D) Immunohistochemical analysis of lower small intestine in WT (C) and IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg mice (D). Arrows indicate staining of FcRn. (E–H) The levels of Igs secreted into the intestinal lumen. Secretory IgM (E), dimeric IgA (F), IgG1 (G), and IgG2a (H) were measured by ELISA. The mean ± SD are shown for each group (n = 8). *P < 0.05. (I) The levels of Igs (IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgA, IgM, and IgE) secreted into the lumen of the indicated mouse strains on a C57BL/6 background were measured by a cytometric bead array.
FcRn-mediated transport of IgG across the epithelial barrier. Since FcRn has been demonstrated to be involved in the secretion of IgG from tissue spaces into the lumen through epithelial cells in a mouse expressing a human transgene under the control of its endogenous promoter (2), we next examined the secretory levels of Igs including IgA, IgM, and IgG within the intestinal lumen of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg and WT littermate control BALB/c mice by ELISA. IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg mice exhibited significant secretion of IgG1 and IgG2a, but not IgA or IgM, into the intestinal lumen (Figure 1, E–H). This finding was further confirmed by an alternative approach using a cytometric bead array with IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg mice on a different genetic background (C57BL/6) compared with WT littermate controls and FcRn–/– mice on the same genetic background (Figure 1I). No IgG was detected in the feces of FcRn–/– C57BL/6 mice, whereas low levels of IgGs were detectable in the feces of WT control C57BL/6 mice, which express low levels of FcRn in the epithelium (Figure 1B). This latter observation is notable because our studies indicate that FcRn expression (Figure 1B) and function (Figure 1I) are not completely extinguished in adult life, but are just markedly diminished relative to neonatal rodents. This is consistent with previous predictions by Ward and colleagues (19) that FcRn is decreased 1,000-fold in adult mice after weaning relative to neonatal mice, which express extremely high levels of FcRn for passive acquisition of IgG from maternal milk. More significantly, increased quantities of secretory IgG1, IgG2b, and IgG3 were detected in the feces of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg C57BL/6 mice, in which intestinal epithelial FcRn expression is enhanced compared with WT and especially FcRn–/– mice (Figure 1I, top panels). In contrast, after the culture of mesenteric lymph node (MLN) cells from these mouse groups without any in vitro stimulation for 2 hours at 37°C, similar levels of IgGs were detected in the culture medium. This indicates that the absence of intestinal IgG secretion in FcRn–/– mice was not due to decreased IgG production (Figure 1I, bottom panels). The absence of detectable IgG2a was due to the genetic background of the mice examined, C57BL/6, as these mice do not express this isotype of IgG.
Given the low-level expression of FcRn observed in intestinal epithelia of WT mice by RT-PCR (Figure 1B), IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg mice were further backcrossed onto a FcRn–/– background to generate IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice in order to limit FcRn expression and function to the epithelium. This would allow for comparison with mice in which FcRn expression was extinguished in the intestinal epithelium, as observed in FcRn–/– mice. Figure 2A shows an analysis of FcRn expression as defined by quantitative PCR analysis of a variety of tissues from IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice compared with WT and FcRn–/– mice. As previously reported (20–22), FcRn expression in the IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice was mainly observed in the intestinal epithelium of the small intestine. In addition, significant expression of FcRn was also observed in the ovaries and bladders of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice. Low-level FcRn expression was detected in the colon, brains, lungs, livers, kidneys, testes, and peripheral blood but not the spleens, uteri, bone marrow, thymi, or MLNs of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice. Importantly, there was no detectable FcRn expression in intestinal epithelia of FcRn–/– mice, as predicted (23), but low-level FcRn was detected in WT mice, consistent with the RT-PCR results shown in Figure 1B. These studies show that Tg expression of FcRn under the control of the IFABP reconstitutes FcRn expression levels in the intestinal epithelium in FcRn–/– mice.
IgG transport into the lumen of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice. (A) Quantitative PCR of cDNA using PCR primers originating in exon 2 in variety of tissues in IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– (Tg/FcRn–/–) mice. IEC, intestinal epithelial cells. (B) Serum rabbit IgG levels in IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– (black bars) and littermate control FcRn–/– mice (white bars) at 24, 48, and 120 hours after injection of rabbit IgG. (C) Serum rabbit IgG levels in IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice measured at 12 hours after injection of rabbit IgG (n = 4). (D) Secretory rabbit IgG levels in feces of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice measured at 12 hours after injection of rabbit IgG as ng per mg of feces (n = 4). *P < 0.05.
We next directly examined whether FcRn in intestinal epithelial cells transports IgG into mucosal secretions, as we previously showed using human FcRn Tg mice (2). To determine whether i.v. injected IgG could be transported into the lumen across the epithelial barrier by FcRn-dependent transcytosis, IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice were examined for their ability to transmit rabbit IgG into the lumen. Since mFcRn can bind rabbit IgG as well as mouse IgG (24), rabbit IgG was injected i.v. into IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– or littermate control FcRn–/– mice, and the levels of IgG in the serum and feces were examined. In the first group of studies, rabbit IgG was examined in the serum after i.v. injection over a period of 120 hours to determine whether IgG was catabolized differently in the presence of FcRn expression within the intestinal epithelium of FcRn–/– mice by virtue of FcRn expression driven by the IFABP. These studies showed that the rabbit IgG concentrations were identical in the IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– and FcRn–/– mice over this time period, suggesting that the expression of FcRn under control of the IFABP contributes little to protecting IgG from catabolism (Figure 2B). Therefore, rabbit IgG was injected i.v. into IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– and FcRn–/– mice, and IgG levels were examined at 12 hours after injection. Although there were no differences in the levels of rabbit IgG in the sera at this time point (Figure 2C), rabbit IgG was detected at significantly higher levels in the feces of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice compared with littermate FcRn–/– mice (Figure 2D). These results indicate that FcRn expression solely in intestinal epithelial cells is involved in the transport of IgG into mucosal secretions and is the major means by which IgG enters the lumen.
FcRn-deficient mice are susceptible to infection with an epithelial cell–specific pathogen, C. rodentium. C. rodentium is a bacterial pathogen that causes a murine infectious colitis equivalent to enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection in humans. This pathogen causes a primary infection that is associated with the apical surface of the gut epithelium. Importantly, CD4+ T cells, B cells, and IgG, but not secretory IgA or IgM, have been shown to play a critical role in prevention against this infection (16–18). Therefore, to test the pathophysiological role of FcRn-mediated IgG secretion into intestinal lumen in the C. rodentium infection, FcRn–/– and littermate control (FcRn+/–) mice were orally inoculated with 1 × 109 of C. rodentium at 3 weeks of age. To exclude the possibility that the pathological changes in C. rodentium infection was directly related to the absence of FcRn and not to other alterations imposed by the knockout mouse model, both BALB/c and C57BL/6 background strains were used in this study. Previous studies have shown that both strains of mice exhibit differing sensitivities to C. rodentium infection, with greater clinical evidence of disease and a fecal burden of bacteria in C57BL/6 mice compared with BALB/c mice (25). Interestingly, FcRn–/– mice exhibited more body weight loss (Figure 3, A and D) and higher bacterial concentrations in the feces at 21 days after infection (Figure 3, B and E) than did FcRn+/– mice, regardless of the genetic backgrounds, with more severe disease and increased levels of fecal bacteria in C57BL/6 mice as previously noted (25). Consistent with this finding, FcRn–/– C57BL/6 mice receiving C. rodentium orally demonstrated a decreased median survival rate, with only 75% of mice surviving at 30 days (Figure 3C), although the surviving mice successfully cleared C. rodentium from their feces by 6 weeks after inoculation (data not shown). Increased amounts of C. rodentium were also detected within epithelial and subepithelial tissues of colon in FcRn–/– mice at 7 days after infection (Figure 3F, right panel), without evidence of C. rodentium in the MLNs and spleen (data not shown). In contrast, C. rodentium infection was limited to the surface of the colonic intestinal epithelium in FcRn+/– mice (Figure 3F, middle panel). No intimin staining was observed in the uninfected colon (Figure 3F, left panel). At the same time, there were no detectable differences in C. rodentium quantities in the feces at day 7 (FcRn–/–, 3.4 × 108 ± 9.2 × 107 CFU/mg feces; FcRn+/–, 3.2 × 108 ± 5.9 × 107 CFU/mg feces; n = 5; P = 0.67). This suggests that one of the earliest events to occur in the FcRn-deficient state is penetration of C. rodentium into the epithelial and subepithelial tissues. Notably in this regard, FcRn+/– mice, but not FcRn–/– mice, contained significant levels of endogenous IgGs in the serum that could react serologically with C. rodentium before infection and at day 7 (Supplemental Figure 1; available online with this article; doi:10.1172/JCI27821DS1). These endogenous IgGs in naive animals, which presumably heterologously bind to C. rodentium but are directed at other bacteria, may be important to managing C. rodentium within epithelial and subepithelial tissues in the presence of FcRn expression within the epithelium.
Susceptibility toC. rodentium infection in the presence of FcRn. (A and B) Susceptibility to infection with 1 × 109 CFU of C. rodentium in FcRn–/– BALB/c mice. (A) Body weight changes in FcRn–/– and FcRn+/– mice with C. rodentium infection. (B) CFU of C. rodentium in feces of FcRn–/– and FcRn+/– mice 21 days after infection. Mean ± SD are shown for each group (n = 6). (C–E) Susceptibility to infection with C. rodentium in FcRn–/– C57BL/6 mice. Survival rate (C) and body weight changes (D) in FcRn–/– and FcRn+/– mice with C. rodentium infection. (E) CFU of C. rodentium in feces of FcRn–/– and FcRn–/+ mice 21 days after infection. Mean ± SD are shown for each group (n = 8). (F) Immunohistochemical analysis of the colon to detect intimin in mice with C. rodentium infection. Colonic tissues were collected at day 7 from selected mice on a C57BL/6 background. Sections were stained for intimin using a polyclonal rabbit anti–C. rodentium intimin antibody (red) and nuclei (blue) and were examined by confocal microscopy. Magnification, ×400. Macroscopic findings (G) and the length of colon (H) in FcRn–/– and FcRn+/– C57BL/6 mice, uninfected or infected with C. rodentium, at 21 days after infection. (I) Histological findings of colon in FcRn–/– and littermate FcRn+/– C57BL/6 mice with or without C. rodentium infection (21 days after infection). Magnification, ×100. (J) Histological score of colonic tissue in the mice with or without C. rodentium infection at day 21. *P < 0.05.
At later time points (Supplemental Figure 1), a significant increase in presumably specific anti–C. rodentium IgGs was detected in the serum of FcRn+/– mice at levels higher than those observed in FcRn–/– mice. This diminished serologic response in FcRn–/– mice, in association with an inability to secrete IgGs into the epithelium and lumen in the absence of FcRn expression in the epithelium, presumably limited the ability of FcRn-deficient mice to properly manage C. rodentium infection. Indeed, macroscopic and microscopic injury was greater in FcRn–/– than in FcRn+/– mice at day 21 after infection. The colons of FcRn–/– mice were characterized by severe shortening and thickening compared with those of FcRn+/– mice (Figure 3, G and H). Consistent with these macroscopic changes, FcRn–/– C57BL/6 mice that were infected with C. rodentium exhibited increased mononuclear cell and neutrophil infiltration into the tissues and significantly increased epithelial injury compared with that observed in FcRn+/– mice (Figure 3I). A quantitative evaluation of histological findings also confirmed the increased injury in the FcRn–/– mice (Figure 3J). These results indicate that FcRn–/– mice, which show an absence of FcRn expression in the intestinal epithelium and intestinal luminal IgG (Figure 1I), are more susceptible to C. rodentium–induced colitis.
Anti–C. rodentium IgG improves infection via mFcRn when expressed on intestinal epithelial cells. The above studies show that defense against an epithelial-associated pathogen is dependent upon FcRn expression. Since FcRn-deficient mice lack both FcRn expression in epithelia and high levels of serum IgG due to a lack of FcRn protection function, it was possible that the inability of these mice to resist C. rodentium infection was due to either or both of these deficiencies. Therefore, to test for the role of IgG and/or FcRn expression in epithelia, IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice were compared with FcRn–/– mice for their ability to eradicate C. rodentium in the presence and absence of anti–C. rodentium IgG. To test whether specific IgG for bacteria is required for the regulation of C. rodentium infection through FcRn-mediated transport of IgG, C. rodentium was orally inoculated into 3-week-old IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– and FcRn–/– mice that had received i.v. administration of either a polyclonal anti–C. rodentium antibody or a nonimmune control antibody. Whereas the control antibody had no effect on C. rodentium eradication in FcRn–/– or Tg mice, the preadministration of specific antibody resulted in less body weight loss (Figure 4A) and lower bacterial concentrations in the feces (Figure 4B) in IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice compared with FcRn–/– mice. Decreased quantities of C. rodentium were also detected within the epithelial and subepithelial tissues of mice in the presence of both FcRn expression in epithelia and anti–C. rodentium IgG, as defined by immunohistochemistry (data not shown). These results indicate that FcRn expression in intestinal epithelial cells contributes to protecting against C. rodentium infection, but only in the presence of specific IgG antibodies.
Induction of immune response toC. rodentium –derived antigen in the presence of circulating IgG and FcRn in intestinal epithelial cells. (A and B) The effect of FcRn-mediated IgG transport into the intestinal lumen in C. rodentium infection. Body weight changes (A) and CFU of C. rodentium in feces 21 days after infection (B) in IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– and FcRn–/– C57BL/6 mice with i.v. injection of anti–C. rodentium IgG or control IgG. Mean ± SD are shown for each group (n = 6). (C) Establishment of a genetically engineered C. rodentium strain that constitutively produces an OVA fragment. The immunoblot confirms the expression of the OVA fragment by C. rodentium. (D) Summary of the experimental protocol, with the inoculation of C. rodentium–OVA or control bacteria, the injection of anti–C. rodentium IgG or control IgG, and the adoptive transfer of CD45.1+CD4+OVA-specific T cells from CD45.1+OT-II mice. (E) The number of OVA-specific CD4+ T cells in the MLNs in IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– and FcRn–/– mice increased in the presence of anti–C. rodentium IgG or control IgG (n = 3). Arrows indicate increasing rounds of cell division. (F and G) Cytokine production in OVA-specific CD4+ T cells purified from the MLNs and cultured with OVA for 48 hours in vitro. Cytokine production of IFN-γ (F) and IL-4 (G) was measured by ELISA. Mean ± SD are shown for each group (n = 4). *P < 0.05.
Antibacterial IgG affects antigen-specific CD4+ T cell responses to C. rodentium when FcRn is expressed in intestinal epithelial cells. Both innate and acquired immune responses are involved in the pathogenesis of infectious colitis (16–18). We have recently demonstrated that FcRn can retrieve luminal IgG/oral antigen (OVA) complexes into the intestinal mucosa, which activate antigen-specific immune responses systemically by transport of immune complexes to regional lymphatic tissues via DCs. To examine whether FcRn also plays a role in infection-induced acquired immune responses by delivering bacteria-derived antigens coupled to specific IgG into mucosal immune cells, a genetically engineered C. rodentium strain was created that constitutively expresses an OVA fragment (residues 139–386 of chicken OVA) containing the peptides recognized by OT-II Tg T cells (residues 323–339) (C. rodentium–OVA) (see Methods). Immunoblot analysis confirmed the expression of OVA in the cell sonicates of C. rodentium–OVA but not control C. rodentium (Figure 4C). The bacterial sonicates from C. rodentium–OVA were also able to stimulate OVA-specific T cells from OT-II mice in in vitro culture with mitomycin C–treated antigen-presenting cells from C57BL/6 mice (data not shown). These results indicate that the OVA fragment produced by C. rodentium can be recognized by OVA-specific CD4+ T cells. To test whether FcRn-mediated delivery of IgG to host cells is required for the induction of immune responses to pathogens in vivo, IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– and FcRn–/– mice were infected with C. rodentium–OVA at 3 weeks of age. Anti–C. rodentium IgG or control IgG was injected at day 4 after infection, followed by adoptive transfer of CFSE-labeled OT-II T cells at day 5. Mononuclear cells from the MLNs were isolated at day 7 and examined by flow cytometry (Figure 4D). Injection of anti–C. rodentium IgG led to a significant increase in the number of CD4+ OT-II cells, as demonstrated by the multiple cell divisions in CFSE-loaded OVA-specific CD4+ T cells in the MLNs (Figure 4E, arrows in right panel) of the IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice infected with C. rodentium–OVA. In contrast, even in the presence of C. rodentium–OVA infection, no significant increase in the number of OVA-specific CD4+ T cells was detected in the MLNs of either IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice that received control IgG or FcRn–/– mice that received anti–C. rodentium IgG. Furthermore, injection of anti–C. rodentium IgG into IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice infected with C. rodentium–OVA led to increased production of IFN-γ (Figure 4F) and IL-4 (Figure 4G) by MLN cells after in vitro OVA stimulation. These results indicate that epithelial FcRn can induce effective CD4+ T cell responses systemically to pathogen-derived antigens associated with the lumen and/or intestinal epithelium when they are retrieved as antigen/IgG complexes.
Intestinal bacterial antigens can be transported from the lumen as an immune complex into the lamina propria by mFcRn in vivo and received by CD11c+ cells. Since normal enteric bacteria have recently been demonstrated to direct the maturation of the host immune system (14), we next established a model system to determine whether antibody in the serum could retrieve a physiologic bacterial antigen from the lumen into mucosal tissues when FcRn was expressed in the intestinal epithelium. To do so, rabbit anti–E. coli IgG (Figure 5A) or control IgG was injected i.v. into IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice or FcRn–/– mice, and FITC-labeled E. coli (Figure 5B) was orally administered 12 hours after the i.v. injection. Two hours after oral administration, a FITC signal was detected in epithelial cells in the small intestine of the IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice in the presence of anti–E. coli IgG (Figure 5F), but not in the presence of control IgG (Figure 5E) or in the absence of FcRn (Figure 5, C and D). To examine whether the bacterial antigen/IgG complexes that were transported across epithelial cells by FcRn were taken up by DCs in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), as we have previously shown (2), cells were obtained from the MLNs 4 hours after the oral inoculation of FITC–E. coli and examined by flow cytometry. FITC–E. coli uptake by DCs in the MLNs was evident, as demonstrated by increased mean fluorescence intensity in the CD11c+ population within the MLNs obtained from IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice in the presence of anti–E. coli IgG (Figure 5G). In contrast, the mean fluorescence intensity in CD11c+ cells from the MLNs of FcRn–/– mice that received anti–E. coli IgG was not significantly different from that observed in the CD11c+ cells from FcRn–/– mice that received control IgG (Figure 5G). No evidence of E. coli was evident in the MLNs, indicating that the fluorescence signal identified was not due to the presence of live bacteria (data not shown). These data indicate that FcRn in the epithelium delivers luminal bacterial antigens to GALT-associated CD11c+ cells in the presence of circulating antibaterial IgG.
Luminal bacterial antigens transported as an immune complex across intestinal epithelial cells via FcRn in vivo. (A and B) Flow cytometry of rabbit anti–E. coli IgG and control IgG followed by PE-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (A) and FITC-conjugated E. coli (B). (C–F) Confocal microscopy analysis of transport of bacterial antigens across intestinal epithelial cells. Sections were stained for actin (phalloidin; red) and nuclei (blue). Magnification, ×400. Arrow in F illustrates transported FITC-conjugated E. coli in intestinal epithelial cells in the presence of rabbit anti–E. coli IgG. (G) Presence of FITC-conjugated E. coli in CD11c+ cells of the MLNs of IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– mice 5 hours after FITC-conjugated E. coli administration in the presence of rabbit anti–E. coli IgG. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) on gated CD11c+ cells is shown. The mean ± SD was shown for each group (n = 4). *P < 0.05.
The recent recognition that FcRn can be expressed by mucosal epithelial cells in adult humans and that FcRn expression mediates an important physiological process that is characterized by bidirectional transport of IgG (11, 12) has led to the notion that the in vivo function of FcRn is broader than the simple acquisition of passive immunity. This is further supported by the recent demonstration that human FcRn, when expressed as a transgene in mice under the control of its endogenous human promoter, can mediate the transport of a model antigen, OVA, from the lumen (2). This raises the possibility that a significant physiological function for FcRn is in mediating intestinal transport of bacterial antigens, given the intestine’s constitutive exposure to a wide spectrum of enteric commensal and pathogenic bacteria. Therefore, this study was designed to establish and test an appropriate animal model in order to define the role of intestinal epithelial cell–associated FcRn in directing immune responses toward epithelial- and luminal-associated bacteria. To do so, we established what we believe to be a novel mouse model (IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/–), in which mFcRn expression was genetically engineered to be specifically restricted to intestinal epithelial cells, and examined the response of these mice to luminal (E. coli) and epithelial cell–associated (C. rodentium) bacteria.
We herein demonstrate that intestinal luminal secretion of IgG was abrogated in FcRn–/– mice. Importantly, the absence of FcRn was shown to enhance the susceptibility to infection of an intestinal pathogen, C. rodentium. However, selective restoration of FcRn expression in intestinal epithelial cells led to a reduction in susceptibility to this infection, but only in the presence of circulating IgG specific for this pathogen. These findings indicate that intestinal epithelial cell–associated FcRn is actively involved in the inhibition of an epithelial cell–associated pathogen, C. rodentium, by delivering IgG into the epithelial cell and/or intestinal lumen. Indeed IgG, but not secretory IgA or IgM, has been shown to play a critical role in the prevention against infection by the attaching and effacing pathogen C. rodentium (16–18). Mechanistically, it may be predicted that intestinal luminal IgG delivered from the lamina propria by FcRn-mediated transport directly contributes to the suppression of C. rodentium infection.
There are 2 mechanisms by which FcRn in the epithelium may play a role in such a host defense function. The first possibility is that FcRn inhibits the adhesion and/or invasion of the bacterium by directing IgG into the location of the invading pathogen with or without the fixation of complement. The second possibility is that FcRn-mediated transcytosis of IgG activates C. rodentium–specific acquired immune responses. Such responses may be induced by DCs, which capture IgG/antigen complexes that are retrieved from the intestinal lumen through epithelial-associated FcRn. Indeed, we demonstrate here that intestinal epithelial cell–associated FcRn retrieved luminal bacterial antigens as a complex with IgG across epithelial barriers into the lamina propria in vivo. Importantly, the retrieved bacterial antigens were efficiently captured by DCs that were able to subsequently activate antigen-specific acquired immune responses by CD4+ T cells within the MLNs. The efficient capture of IgG/antigen complexes by DCs is consistent with recent studies showing uptake of immune complexes by DCs (26). Since CD4+ T cells have been shown to participate in prevention against C. rodentium infection (16, 18), FcRn may be an important and essential means to stimulate CD4+ T cell–mediated acquired immune responses to inhibit this, and potentially other, epithelial infections. Importantly, no increase in the number of CFSE-labeled CD4+ T cells was observed in FcRn Tg mice in the absence of specific IgG, indicating an important role for FcRn-mediated antibody transport in regulating adaptive immune responses.
In addition to infection, these results may have important implications for the dysregulated host/microbial interactions that underlie the development of chronic intestinal inflammation associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory bowel disease is notable for the presence of highly activated pathogenic CD4+ T cell populations (27). An increase in the production of IgG specific for luminal bacteria is also associated with the development of experimental colitis (28, 29). The bacterial antigens, which are recognized by such IgGs, are often identical to the antigens that drive the pathogenic T cell responses, as was recently shown for bacterial flagellins (30). Therefore, it is also possible that FcRn-mediated retrieval of enteric bacterial antigens as IgG immune complexes may be — in some situations — involved in the pathogenesis of chronic colitis by activating harmful acquired immune responses. Consistent with this, FcRn has recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (31) and bullous pemphigoid (32) by virtue of FcRn’s ability to regulate IgG levels including pathogenic IgGs.
Enteric bacterial antigens are also involved in generating the normal structure and function of the GALT (14). The transport of intestinal antigens is tightly regulated by the epithelial layer, which anatomically provides an important barrier to separate the intestine from the luminal contents. M cells, a specialized epithelial cell type present in the follicle-associated epithelium, have been previously considered as the major “professional” antigen-sampling cell type that is capable of delivering luminal antigens into the lamina propria (33). In addition, intestinal DCs have been demonstrated to directly capture antigens or bacteria present in the intestinal lumen by opening the tight junctions between epithelial cells and sending dendrites into the lumen for antigen capture and retrieval (34, 35). We have recently demonstrated a third pathway, in which intestinal epithelial cell–associated FcRn is involved in sampling orally administrated antigens (such as food antigens) by retrieving the antigen as an IgG immune complex through absorptive epithelial cells (2). In the present study, by showing that commensal bacterial antigens (E. coli) could also be sampled from the intestinal lumen by an FcRn-mediated transport pathway and delivered into DCs within MLNs, our studies may have important implications for establishment of the normal GALT. It is presumed that these processes occur in situations wherein the host has acquired IgG either passively (e.g., neonatal rodent or human) or actively (e.g., after a primary immune response). In this context, the broad expression of FcRn in absorptive epithelia would allow for transport of luminal antigen over a wide surface area, allowing for broad flexibility in extending an opportunity for the host to respond to luminal antigen. In addition, recent studies have suggested that the manner in which antigen is taken up by a DC confers distinct functions on the DC (26). Interestingly, Fcγ receptor IIB–mediated (FcγRIIB-mediated) capture of immune complexes are involved in the generation of DC-mediated immune tolerance through the activation of inhibitory motifs of these receptors (36). In addition, Igs have been proposed to suppress intestinal inflammation by facilitating phagocytosis of pathogenic antigens (37), and IgG in the lumen of the lung has been suggested to reduce allergen-induced asthma (38). Therefore, it is possible that the sampling of intestinal luminal antigens by an FcRn-mediated process contributes to unique, broadly expressed, and highly flexible functions of mucosal effector and/or regulatory pathways. These may be involved in the maintenance of mucosal tolerance characteristic of this compartment or the development of intestinal inflammation, as might occur if the transported antigen has adjuvant qualities. Such properties may have important consequences for establishing GALT structure during development and in response to pathogenic exposures.
In this study, we provide what we believe are novel insights into the role of FcRn when associated with the intestinal epithelium. FcRn in the epithelium is the primary means by which IgG reaches the lumen, as shown by the absence of luminal IgG in the context of FcRn deficiency. Moreover, FcRn may play a significant role in defending against epithelial-associated pathogens, as shown by increased sensitivity to C. rodentium in the absence of FcRn expression and by restoration of host resistance to C. rodentium in the context of Tg FcRn reconstitution, specifically within the intestinal epithelium. We specifically associate this observation with FcRn’s ability to provide this immune defense function in the presence of circulating IgG and to direct IgG into the lumen and antigen into DCs, whereupon adaptive immunity is enhanced. FcRn within the epithelium may thus be able to link microbial antigen encounters within the lumen and/or epithelium with systemic immune compartments. The ability of FcRn to provide these functions over a broad surface area may have important implications for understanding the development of GALT and its dysregulation in inflammation.
Animals. A Tg mouse strain in which both mFcRn and mβ2m are constitutively and specifically expressed in the intestinal epithelial cells under the control of an IFABP (kindly provided by J. Gordon, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) (20–22) was generated and further backcrossed to FcRn–/– mice (23) in order to eliminate FcRn expression in other cell types (IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/–). These mice were backcrossed 6 generations onto either BALB/c or C57BL/6 (CD45.2+). For OVA studies, OT-II mice were used (39), which express a restricted Tg T cell receptor that recognizes a peptide fragment of OVA (residues 323–339) in the context of I-Ab (CD45.1+C57BL/6). These studies were approved by the Standing Committee on Animals at Harvard Medical School.
RT-PCR. Epithelial cells were nonenzymatically isolated as described previously (40), and total RNA was extracted using Tri zol reagent (Invitrogen). RT-PCR reaction was carried out using specific primer sets for mFcRn, mβ2m, and mβ-actin as described previously (41).
Quantitative PCR. Tissues were collected into RNAlater (Ambion), and total RNA was extracted using Tri zol reagent (Invitrogen). For the expression analysis of the mFcRn transgene, specific primer sets for the mFcRn transgene (Primer 1, 5′-GCCCTCAGCCTCTTGTTGG-3′; Primer 2, 5′-CCCGTAGATGGGTTTGACACA-3′) were used for amplification with detection of a 102-bp cDNA fragment. Quantitative PCR was carried out with 1 μl cDNA in the presence of iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) and an iQ5 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) for real-time detection. mFcRn transgene expression levels were determined via the comparative cycle threshold (2–ΔδCt) methods (Applied Biosystems User Bulletin 2) and normalized to mβ-actin.
Immunohistochemistry. For the detection of mFcRn, tissues were snap-frozen and subjected to immunohistochemical staining (42) using rabbit anti-FcRn antibodies (kindly provided by N.E. Simister, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). For the detection of C. rodentium, sections were stained for intimin using the polyclonal rabbit anti–C. rodentium intimin sera (kindly provided G. Frankel, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom) followed by Alexa564-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes) and nuclei and examined under confocal microscopy (MRC1024 laser scanning confocal system; Bio-Rad).
Detection of serum and secretory mouse and rabbit Ig. Secretory mouse and rabbit Igs present in the intestinal lumen were assessed by ELISA as previously described (2). The levels of Igs (IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgA, IgM, and IgE) secreted into the lumen were also examined by an alternative method, a cytometric bead array performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction (BD Biosciences — Pharmingen). The collected feces were resuspended in PBS and incubated with the fluorescent beads at concentrations that were normalized for the quantities of protein. After incubation with anti-mouse κ detector antibodies, the beads were analyzed by flow cytometry. To examine IgG production by the MLNs, mononuclear cells were collected from the MLNs of FcRn–/–, IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg, and WT control mice (C57BL/6). Cells (1 × 107/ml) in PBS (pH 7.4) were cultured without any in vitro stimulation for 2 hours on 37°C, after which the Ig levels were evaluated by flow cytometric analysis as described above.
Preparation of cell suspensions. Antigen-presenting cells were isolated using a digestion buffer, as described previously (2), with a modification. Cells were carefully collected from the interface, washed with PBS, and used.
Protocol for induction of colitis by C. rodentium infection. C. rodentium strain DBS100 (catalog no. 51459; ATCC) was used. 3-week-old mice were orally infected as described previously (16). OVA-expressing C. rodentium was created by electroporating plasmid DH136 into C. rodentium strain DBS100. DH136 contains a cassette of the pTR(lac) promoter driving expression of residues 139–386 of chicken OVA, cloned into the EcoRV site of the low-copy plasmid pACYC184 (chloramphenicol selection). pTR(lac) drives constitutive expression of OVA. After electroporation with a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser II, chloramphenicol-resistant transformants were verified to retain normal production of LPS and to constitutively express the 139–386 fragment of OVA. To ensure maintenance of the plasmid during in vivo infection, 500 μg/ml chloramphenicol was added to the drinking water. All methods and procedures with infected animals were performed in BL-2 safety cabinets. Colonic tissues with H&E stain were evaluated by a pathologist (J.N. Glickman) in a blinded fashion, and results were represented as a total score (43).
Adoptive transfer, CFSE labeling of OVA-specific OT-II CD4+ T cells, and antigenic challenge of C. rodentium–OVA. IFABP-mFcRnTg/mβ2mTg/FcRn–/– or FcRn–/– C57BL/6 mice (3 weeks old) were orally infected with 1 × 109 CFU of C. rodentium–OVA or WT C. rodentium. The mice received 2 mg of anti–C. rodentium IgG or control IgG i.v. at day 4 after the bacterial inoculation and subsequently received CFSE-labeled CD45.1+CD4+OT-II T cells for the detection of cell division or nonlabeled CD45.1+CD4+OT-II T cells for examination of antigen-specific cytokine production by adoptive transfer at day 5. Cytokine measurements were made with CD4+ T cells prepared from MLNs and stimulated with C57BL/6 splenocytes pulsed with OVA as antigen-presenting cells. On day 7, MLN cells were subjected to flow cytometric analysis for the evaluation of CFSE intensity (indicating cell division) of the CD4+ T cells gated on CD45.1+ cells.
Preparation of FITC–E. coli and in vivo transcytosis of antigen/IgG complexes. E. coli (DH5α; Invitrogen) was labeled with 1 mg/ml of FITC solution in PBS at pH 7.4 for 15 minutes. To analyze the transcytosis of bacterial antigen/IgG complexes, 2 mg rabbit anti–E. coli IgG (Dako) or control IgG was injected i.v. into mice. FITC-conjugated E. coli (1 × 109 cells) was administered intragastrically 12 hours after the i.v. injection of IgG, and tissue from the mid-small intestine was collected 2 hours after the oral inoculation. Tissue sections were subjected to staining for detection of actin (phalloidin; red) and nuclei (blue) and examined by confocal microscopy as previously described. MLN cells were isolated 5 hours after oral inoculation, stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD11c and 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) to exclude dead cells, and examined by flow cytometry.
Statistics. Statistical significance was determined by a 2-tailed Student’s t test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
This work was supported in part by Research Fellowships from Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America (M. Yoshida, T. Nagaishi, and A. Kaser) and by NIH grant DK53056 (R.S. Blumberg and W.I. Lencer), Harvard Digestive Diseases Center grant P30 (R.S. Blumberg and W.I. Lencer), and NIH grants DK51362 and DK44319 (R.S. Blumberg). A. Mizoguchi was supported by NIH grant DK64351, and E. Mizoguchi was supported by NIH grant DK64289.
Address correspondence to: Richard S. Blumberg, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 732-6917; Fax: (617) 264-5185; E-mail: rblumberg@partners.org .
Nonstandard abbreviations used: FcRn, neonatal Fc receptor for IgG; GALT, gut-associated lymphoid tissue; IFABP, intestinal fatty acid–binding protein gene promoter; β2m, β2-microglobulin; m-, mouse; MLN, mesenteric lymph node.
Conflict of interest: R.S. Blumberg and W.I. Lencer have an equity interest in Syntonix Pharmaceuticals Inc., which is developing FcRn-related therapeutics.
Reference information: J. Clin. Invest.116:2142–2151 (2006). doi:10.1172/JCI27821.
Masaru Yoshida’s present address is: Frontier Medical Science in Gastroenterology, International Center for Medical Research and Treatment, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.