Advertisement
Research ArticleImmunology Free access | 10.1172/JCI26190
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA. 3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dirk P. Dittmer, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, 804 Mary Ellen Jones, CB#7290, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7290, USA. Phone: (919) 966-7960; Fax: (919) 962-8103; E-mail: ddittmer@med.unc.edu.
Find articles by Fakhari, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA. 3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dirk P. Dittmer, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, 804 Mary Ellen Jones, CB#7290, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7290, USA. Phone: (919) 966-7960; Fax: (919) 962-8103; E-mail: ddittmer@med.unc.edu.
Find articles by Jeong, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA. 3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dirk P. Dittmer, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, 804 Mary Ellen Jones, CB#7290, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7290, USA. Phone: (919) 966-7960; Fax: (919) 962-8103; E-mail: ddittmer@med.unc.edu.
Find articles by Kanan, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA. 3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dirk P. Dittmer, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, 804 Mary Ellen Jones, CB#7290, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7290, USA. Phone: (919) 966-7960; Fax: (919) 962-8103; E-mail: ddittmer@med.unc.edu.
Find articles by Dittmer, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published March 1, 2006 - More info
Kaposi sarcoma–associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is a human lymphotropic herpesvirus. It is implicated in B cell neoplasias such as primary effusion lymphoma and multicentric Castleman disease in AIDS patients. The KSHV latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA) is consistently expressed in all KSHV-associated tumor cells and was shown to bind the tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb. To test LANA’s contribution to lymphomagenesis in vivo we generated transgenic mice expressing LANA under the control of its own promoter, which is B cell specific. All of the transgenic mice developed splenic follicular hyperplasia due to an expansion of IgM+IgD+ B cells and showed increased germinal center formation. We also observed lymphomas, implying that LANA can activate B cells and provide the first step toward lymphomagenesis.
Approximately one-fourth to one-third of all human cancers are of viral etiology (1). Kaposi sarcoma–associated herpesvirus (KSHV, also referred to as HHV-8) is a human lymphotropic (γ) herpesvirus. It is tightly associated with the development of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) as well as 2 B cell lymphoproliferative diseases: primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) and multicentric Castleman disease (MCD; reviewed in ref. 2). MCD is a follicular hyperplasia of lymphoid tissue and in its more aggressive form has been described as an expansion of plasma cells. Patients with MCD often develop secondary B cell lymphomas as well as KS. PEL is a lymphoma of B cell origin that is characterized by increased CD138/syndecan-1 expression (a plasma cell maker) and lymphomatous effusions (3, 4). KSHV has also been found in a subset of solid diffuse large B cell lymphomas in AIDS patients (5–8), implicating this virus in multiple B cell lineage malignancies. Therefore, we hypothesized that KSHV infection renders mature B cells hyperresponsive to antigen stimulation. Such hyperactive B cells provide an expanded target for second-site mutations or cytokine-driven hyperplasia, cumulating in lymphoma in the immune suppressed.
Several PEL cell lines have been established in culture, all of which harbor the latent form of KSHV. PELs are monoclonal, have rearranged their IgG loci, and, on the basis of transcriptional profiling, have been characterized as a post germinal center (GC), or plasmablastoid lymphoma (4, 9, 10). In a systematic attempt to determine the contribution of KSHV viral genes to KSHV-associated cancers, we previously analyzed the transcription pattern of all KSHV mRNAs in KS and PEL cell lines in culture and in xenograft tumors (11–13). The KSHV latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA) was present in every single tumor, which was consistent with in situ analyses (14, 15). The LANA protein is necessary and sufficient for latent viral episome maintenance (16–18). This, however, is not the only function of LANA. LANA binds to the p53 and pRb tumor suppressor proteins as well as glycogen synthase kinase 3β (19–21). It can function as a transcriptional activator of its own viral (22) and cellular gene promoters, which in the aggregate changes STAT-, p53-, and pRb-dependent signaling events (23–25). These molecular observations imply a role for LANA in B cell oncogenesis beyond viral maintenance, but so far have not been explored in vivo. Using transgenic mice that expressed LANA protein in mature B cells, we found that LANA activated mature B cells in the absence of antigen stimulation, which predisposed the animals to lymphoma development.
No animal model currently exists that recapitulates KSHV-dependent B cell lymphomagenesis. We reasoned that investigating LANA’s transforming potential in transgenic mice represents a reasonable approximation of PEL and MCD. The transgenic approach allowed us to draw upon the accumulated knowledge of murine B lineage development as well as an abundance of defined phenotypic and molecular markers. We used the viral KSHV LANA promoter (LANAp) to achieve authentic expression levels of LANA protein (Figure 1A). This promoter is hypomethylated in latently infected cells and constitutively active in all KSHV-associated malignancies (11, 13, 26). Furthermore, the LANAp fragment extending to –1299 was active in CD19+ B cells, but not CD3+ T cells, in the spleen and bone marrow of transgenic mice (27). In an effort to mimic the multicistronic nature of the KSHV latency locus, the transgene construct also contained the GFP gene under control of the thymidine kinase (TK) promoter. However, we could not detect GFP expression (data not shown). Multiple independent founder lines were generated by pronuclear injection and validated by integration-specific Southern blot analysis (Figure 1B). In spleen, transgenic mice expressed levels of LANA mRNA that were equivalent to those found in PEL as determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR, which was normalized to murine housekeeping apoB mRNA (Figure 1C). We also detected transgene mRNA in the spleens and kidneys of some animals. However, this did not result in phenotypic changes (data not shown). Consistent with the progressive amplification of LANA-expressing B cells during lymphoid hyperplasia, we observed variation in LANA mRNA levels in the spleens of individual animals. Importantly, the LANA transgene remained transcribed in spleen after 6 generations of backcrosses into a C57BL/6 background (Figure 1D).
Development of LANA transgenic mice. (A) The LANA transcription locus (14) and transgene construct carrying LacZneo (27) as previously described and the LANA transgene construct used here. SV40 pA, simian virus 40 poly A; β-geo, β-galactosidase-neomycin; TK, thymidine kinase. (B) Southern blot analysis of tail DNA, digested with BamHI and hybridized with a LANA-specific probe to reveal the founder-specific integration sites. Lane 1 shows the transgene plasmid as a positive control (Pos.), lane 5 contains the DNA from a C57BL/6 mouse as negative control (Neg.), and remaining lanes represent DNA from LANA transgenic animals belonging to lines i, ii, and iii (animals 4 and 6 are siblings). Arrowhead indicates a fragment specific for all transgenic animals; other bands are integration-site specific. (C and D) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of spleen samples for LANA transgene mRNA or apoB housekeeping mRNA resolved on a 2% tris-borate-EDTA–agarose gel and (C) subsequent Southern blot analysis with a probe specific for LANA (LANA-P). Lanes i–v refer to spleen RNA from 5 different transgene-positive animals. NTC, nontemplate control; MW, 100-bp molecular weight marker. (D) Lanes 1–3 show transgene-negative, and lanes 4–6 transgene-positive, littermates after backcross into the C57BL/6 background.
To characterize the effect of LANA on B cell development, we examined multiple littermates of 2 independent founder lines in detail. The mice in these experiments were age- and sex-matched littermates and housed together, that is, exposed to similar environmental antigens. To guard against “founder effects,” which might skew the phenotype, we started our analysis after the fourth generation of transgenic mice was backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice. Hence, all animals were (1/2)4 or ≥94% isogenic to their nontransgenic littermates. We detected LANA protein expression within the center of transgenic spleen follicles but not in littermate control animals (Figure 2A). The primary follicles in the LANA transgenic mice were LANA and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) positive and larger in diameter (Figure 2B). They were highly proliferative compared with control animals as evidenced by PCNA staining. Both LANA and PCNA are located in the nucleus. As B cells have very little cytoplasm, the majority of the signal was nuclear. Hyperplasia was associated with increased spleen weight (P ≤ 0.04, Student’s t test; n = 48) and expanded follicles in 100% of the transgenic mice. To determine at which stage in B cell development LANA exerted its effect, we surveyed splenic B cell populations using flow cytometry. This revealed a significant increase in forward scatter–high (FSChi; i.e., activated), mature CD19+IgM+IgD+ B cells (Table 1). The increase in the FSChiIgD+IgM+ cell population was consistent with follicular hyperplasia and statistically significant (P < 0.0002, Mann-Whitney U test; n = 26). Early GC and activated follicular cells also were increased (CD21–CD23+CD19+IgD+). Marginal zone (MZ) cells (CD21+CD23–CD19+IgD–), which differentiate to GC in response to T cell–independent antigens, were not affected. Later stages in antigen-dependent B cell maturation such as late GC (CD45R+CD27–CD40+CD38–), memory (CD45R+CD27+CD40–CD38+), and plasma cells (IgG+CD138+) also were not affected.
LANA expression in spleens. (A) Immunohistochemistry using a rat mAb against LANA (right panels) or rabbit polyclonal antibody against PCNA (left panels) and visualization with NovaRed (brown) and hematoxylin (blue) counterstain in a transgene-negative and a LANA-positive animal. Arrowhead indicates the localization of LANA-positive cells. Magnification, ×400. (B) Diameter of LANA-positive foci for wild-type and transgenic animals (P ≤ 0.01, n = 11). The box represents the interquartile range, the line within the box indicates the median and whiskers indicate the highest and lowest values.
To further characterize the LANA-positive population in the LANA transgenic mice, we performed immunohistochemistry. Peanut agglutinin (PNA) and GL-7 are associated with activated GC B cells. IgD is a marker for mature B cells that is lost upon differentiation late during GC maturation. PNA staining revealed marked differences between normal and transgenic animals. All LANA transgenic mice (100%) presented with enlarged, irregular patches of PNA-positive cells compared with the fewer, smaller PNA-positive foci seen in control mice (Figure 3). In addition, we observed single, extrafollicular PNA-positive cells in the LANA transgenic mice, suggesting that these cells assumed activated characteristics outside the GC context. Consistent with our flow cytometric analysis, IgD remained expressed in the hyperproliferative foci of LANA transgenic mice (Figure 3). Few GL-7–positive foci (i.e., late GC) were present in wild-type mice. By comparison to PNA, the GL-7 positive foci were equally rare and at times smaller in the LANA mice than in wild-type mice (Figure 3). This became particularly evident at higher magnification. The control (no primary antibody) showed no background staining in either wild-type or LANA transgenic mice. We did not observe changes in T cell distribution as determined by CD3 staining (data not shown).
Analysis of GC development in a representative LANA and littermate wild-type mouse. Markers are indicated on the left (No 1°, no primary antibody). All sections are counterstained blue with hematoxylin. Magnification, ×400 (bottom 2 panels); ×100 (remaining panels).
To examine the impact of antigen exposure on LANA mice, we immunized with NP(30)–keyhole limpet hemocyanin [NP(30)-KLH] and after 7 days stained the spleens again with PNA. As before, LANA transgenic mice, but not wild-type littermates, showed prominent PNA-positive foci in the absence of immunization (Figure 4). With regard to GC formation we did not detect any difference between saline-treated (n = 8) and NP(30)-KLH–immunized (n = 9) LANA transgenic mice. In contrast, wild-type mice responded with GC formation to NP(30)-KLH (n = 4), but not to saline (n = 3). This phenotype is consistent with LANA activating mature B cells (PCNA+, PNA+, FSChi) in the absence of antigen, causing focal aggregation. However, the cells did not complete the GC reaction without antigen and remained IgD+GL-7–. At this point we do not know whether in response to KLH immunization the LANA transgenic mice arrested at early GC stage (pre–GL-7) or exhibited an accelerated phenotype in which most of the KLH-responsive B cell clones had already left the GC and migrated to the bone marrow as mature plasma cells.
GC response to NP(30)-KLH. Spleen sections of wild-type and LANA transgenic mice with or without NP(30)-KLH immunization (-I) were stained with PNA. Arrowheads indicate GCs. Magnification, ×40 (top panels); ×100 (bottom panels).
The tumors in LANA transgenic animals were of B cell lineage. Figure 5 shows an example of a LANA transgenic animal, which at autopsy presented with severe splenomegaly (spleen size greater than 5 times that of the LANA-positive littermate control). Medium-sized plasma cells with abundant cytoplasm and prominent central nuclei and a mixture of immunoblasts and plasmablasts with anaplastic plasmacytoma phenotype (28) were observed on H&E sections. We defined plasma cells according to McHeyzer-Williams and colleagues (29) as CD27–/surface IgG-κ+ for plasma I and B220+/CD138+ for plasma II. Plasma I (20%) and plasma II (16%) cell populations (Figure 5, H and G) were significantly expanded relative to littermate controls (2% and 3%, respectively; Figure 5, J and I). This phenotype in the LANA transgenic mouse model represents an expansion of the same B cell population as KSHV-associated human lymphomas (9, 30), most closely resembling MCD and plasmablastic lymphomas (31). In situ analysis showed that major portions of the spleen were taken over by IgG-κ+/λ– lymphoma cells (Figure 5, A and C, and Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; doi:10.1172/JCI26190DS1), while only a few clustered IgG-positive cells were evident in normal mice over 300 days old (Figure 5, B and D) and in normal LANA littermate controls of the same age and sex. The lymphoma cells were CXC-chemokine receptor 4 positive (CXCR4+), which on B cells is only expressed at the plasma cell stage (Figure 5, E and F). All lymphoma cells expressed the LANA protein (Supplemental Figure 2). Based on a review of H&E–stained spleen sections, 11% of LANA transgenic mice (7 of 63) developed lymphomas, twice the rate recorded previously in C57BL/6 mice and in our LANAp-LacZ transgenic mice (32). In addition to plasmacytoma, we observed follicular B cell lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, and composite lymphoma (Figure 6). We did not observe the exact equivalent to human PEL, since none of the tumors presented as malignant effusions. To differentiate between lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) and lymphoma, we analyzed IgG VH usage in wild-type spleens and LANA transgenic mouse tumors. All tumors were monoclonal, as evidenced by reduction of heterogeneity in the PCR signal, with primers specific for VH7183:JH, Dq52:JH, or VHJ558:JH family rearrangements each yielding 4 products in wild-type mice (Figure 7). If a tumor was present in the background of normal spleen cells, a nonrandom single band appeared brighter than all the other bands. The specific clonal rearrangement for tumors 2 and 3 was VH7183Dq52JH2. For tumor 4 it was Dq52JH2. No VH rearrangement was detected for tumor 4, suggesting that the VH rearrangement involved a family other than VH7183 or VHJ558. Tumor 1 was an anaplastic plasmacytoma for which clonality was confirmed by monotypic IgG-κ light chain expression (Figure 7 and Supplemental Figure 1). Total input DNA was normalized based on real-time quantitative PCR for the single-copy apoB gene, which allowed us to see enrichment of monoclonal tumor cells in the background of some wild-type splenic B cells.
Anaplastic plasmacytoma in a LANA transgenic animal. (A–D) IgG-κ expression (surface and intracellular) in a lymphoma from LANA transgenic (A and C) and nontransgenic (B and D) littermates. (E and F) CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) for expression in LANA transgenic (E) or control (F) mice. Magnification, ×100 (A, B, E, and F); ×400 (C and D). All sections are counterstained blue with hematoxylin. (G and H) Flow cytometry analysis of the anaplastic plasmacytoma. (I and J) Flow cytometry analysis of spleen of a nontransgenic littermate. (G and I) Gates represent CD138+B220+CD27– lymphoma cells at 16% frequency and normal spleen cells at 3% frequency. (H and J) Gates represent IgG-κ+B220–CD27– lymphoma cells at 20% frequency and normal spleen cells at 2% frequency.
H&E stain of wild-type mice and phenotypes in LANA transgenic mice — LPD, MZ lymphoma (MZ), and anaplastic plasmacytoma (PC). Arrowheads indicate individual cells that exemplify the phenotype in panels E, G, and H. Magnification, ×100 (A–D); ×400 (E–H).
PCR analysis of VDJH and DJH rearrangements in tumors of LANA transgenic mice. Total spleen genomic DNAs were used in the PCR reactions analyzing tumors. (A–C) PCR analysis of total spleen genomic DNAs from 4 LANA transgenic mice with tumors, 2 C57BL/6 mice older than 300 days (WT), and 2 different murine B cell lines resolved on a 1.5% Tris-acetate-EDTA–agarose gel, used as controls for the clonality. WT lanes demonstrate VDJH1, VDJH2, VDJH3, and VDJH4 rearrangements (A and B) using VH7183 (A) or VHJ558 primers (B) and DJH1, DJH2, DJH3, and DJH4 rearrangements (C) using Dq52 primers. The primers were designed to amplify all rearrangement products between JH4 and VH7183, VHJ558, or Dq52; 4 different bands would be expected by the combination of each primer set. M, 100-bp DNA Ladder (New England Biolabs Inc.) (D) DNA samples used for the Ig rearrangement PCRs were quantified using real-time quantitative PCR to demonstrate equal total DNA concentrations.
We chose the B cell compartment to query the effects of the KSHV LANA in vivo based on the natural history of this virus, which establishes latency in B cells (33) and is associated with PEL and MCD, 2 B cell hyperproliferative diseases. The fact that the KSHV LANA promoter is active in mice is consistent with exhaustive infectivity studies for this virus (34). In particular, de novo infection of SCID-human chimeric mice showed that given the choice between T cells or B cells, only CD19+ B cells supported indefinite LANA expression and latent maintenance of the KSHV episome (35). Using the LANA transgenic mice as guidance, we speculate that in asymptomatic human carriers, infected resident B cells (IgM+IgD+CD19+) remain organ-resident and sustain KSHV latent persistence. Such a model is consistent with the low frequency of KSHV genome–positive cells in circulating peripheral blood lymphocytes of LANA-seropositive individuals (36, 37). By comparison, EBV viral loads in asymptomatic carriers are 10- to 1,000-fold higher than KSHV viral loads in asymptomatic KSHV-infected patients (36). Even though memory B cells are generally considered the most long-lived B cell population, mature B cells are long-lived as well. In the mouse spleen, resident follicular cells live up to 4.5 months, or 4 times the time required to reach sexual maturity (38), and as such represent a stable compartment for lifelong viral persistence. The LANA-dependent hyperactive B cell phenotype uncovered here may induce reactivation/reinfection cycles with high frequency, which were shown to augment latent viral persistence in a KSHV culture model (39).
In the LANA mice, mature B cells were focally aggregated, activated, and hyperproliferative (FSChi, PNA+, and PCNA+). Typically, this only occurs in response to antigen and constitutes the initial stage in GC formation. Here it resulted in a benign LPD with 100% penetrance, which increased the chance to sustain a second-site mutation and over time gave rise to frank B cell lymphomas. LANA fostered this developmental step but could not substitute for the paracrine signals and antigen required for complete GC maturation (IgD–GL-7+). This phenotype is analogous to mice with constitutively active B cell CLL/lymphoma 6 (bcl-6), which also present with LPD, antigen-independent GCs, and low-frequency diffuse large B cell lymphomas at advanced age (40). LANA alone does not transform cells in culture, but ectopic expression in B cell lines rendered cells resistant to p16INK4-mediated cell-cycle arrest (25). LANA can also augment cell activation events through the ras/MAPK pathway (21), and this may provide a molecular explanation for how LANA contributes to oncogenesis. The long latency to lymphoma development in our transgenic mice indicates that additional signals are needed for LANA-dependent lymphomagenesis. However, this is not a hit-and-run mechanism, since LANA remained expressed in all tumor cells. In PEL and MCD, secondary signals are thought to be provided by other KSHV oncogenes (41) that are latently expressed in the same cell or act through paracrine signaling. The transgenic mouse model described herein suggests the novel possibility that these secondary signals may be provided by continued antigen exposure or coinfection with other pathogens, as is frequently seen in AIDS patients.
The LANA transgenic mice developed here will allow us to elucidate the molecular mechanism of LANA within the appropriate cellular lineage in vivo, as well as the effect of secondary growth stimuli, due to exogenous or other viral oncogenes such as KSHV’s cyclin-D homolog, which as a transgene can cause B and T cell lymphomas in the absence of p53 (42). In addition this model will be useful to test novel therapies against KSHV lymphomas.
Transgenic mice. The entire KSHV LANA open reading frame was placed under control of its own transcriptional regulatory region, encompassing 1299 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site to yield plasmid pDD445. As an additional guard against possible epigenetic inactivation of the viral promoter, we included the promoter for the cellular TK gene, which is active in many tissues and has been used previously in transgenic models, downstream of the LANA coding region. Transgenic mice were generated by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Transgenic Mouse Development Facility at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Southern blotting and real-time quantitative RT-PCR were performed as previously described (27). All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Immunohistochemistry. Spleens were removed, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and processed by routine methods, and 5-μm sections were obtained. Dewaxed sections were microwaved in 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) for PCNA and PNA, RetrievagenA for rat mAb to LANA, or RetrievagenB (BD Biosciences — Pharmingen) for all other antibodies for 15 minutes, cooled, treated with 3% H2O2, blocked with 10% horse serum, and incubated overnight with the appropriate primary antibody. Detection was with VECTASTAIN ABC kit and Vector NovaRed substrate (Vector Laboratories). Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Immunofluorescent staining. Spleens were removed, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and processed by routine methods, and 5-μm sections were obtained. Dewaxed sections were microwaved in 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), blocked with 10% horse serum, and incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse κ or FITC-conjugated anti-mouse Ig λ1, λ2, and λ3 light chain for 1 hour.
Flow cytometry. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from spleens by pressing through 100-μm cell strainers. Erythrocytes were depleted using buffered ammonium chloride. Cells were stained at 1 × 108 cells/ml on ice for 1 hour in the dark, with a cocktail of 3 or 4 antibodies conjugated with PE, FITC, TRI-color (TC), and allophycocyanin (APC) diluted in PBS with 3% BSA. Flow cytometry analysis was performed with FACScalibur and CellQuest program (CellQuestPro; BD Biosciences). Further analysis was conducted using FlowJo (version 6.1; Tree Star Inc.) and SPSS software (version 11.0; SPSS).
Antibodies. PE-conjugated anti-mouse IgM (clone R6-60.2), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD21/CD35 (clone 7G6), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD138 (Syndecan-1), FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgD (clone 11-26c.2a), and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse Ig λ1, λ2, and λ3 light chain (clone R26-46) mAbs were purchased from BD Biosciences; FITC-conjugated anti-mouse MHC class II (clone M5/114.15.2) mAb was from Miltenyi Biotec; PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD27 (clone LG.7F9) mAb was from eBioscience; FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD38 (clone 90), anti-human CD27 (clone CLB-27/1), anti-mouse κ (clone LO-MK), phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-mouse CD23 (clone B3B4), anti-mouse CD40 (clone 3/23), APC-conjugated CD23, TC-conjugated anti-mouse CD19 (clone 6D5), and anti-mouse CD45R (clone RA3-6B2) mAbs were from CALTAG Laboratories; rat mAb to LANA was from Advanced Biotechnologies Inc.; anti-PCNA rabbit polyclonal IgG (FL-261) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.; Biotinylated Peanut Agglutinin was from Vector Laboratories.
Immunization. Transgenic and littermate control mice (29–34 weeks old) were immunized i.p. with 100 μg NP(30)-KLH alum precipitated (Biosearch Technologies Inc.) in 0.2 ml saline or 0.2 ml saline (mock).
Detection of Ig gene rearrangements. DNA was isolated from spleens using Wizard SV Genomic DNA kit (Promega). PCR was set up in a volume of 20 μl with 2× ImmoMix (Bioline), 1.7 ng genomic DNA, and 250 nmol primers. PCR reactions were preheated for 5 minutes at 92°C, followed by 40 cycles of 30 seconds at 95°C, 30 seconds at 56°C, and 3 minutes at 72°C. Primers for detection of Ig rearrangements were described previously (43–46). The primers were designed to amplify all rearrangement products between JH4 and VH7183, VHJ558, or Dq52; if DHJH and VHDHJH rearrangements had occurred, 4 bands were observed depending on the JH element (JH1, JH2, JH3, or JH4) that was used. DNA Ladder (100 bp; New England Biolabs Inc.) was used to determine the size of PCR products. Primers used were: Figure 7A, 5′-GCAGCTGGTGGAGTCTGG-3′ and 5′-CTCTCAGCCGGCTCCCTCAGGG-3′; Figure 7B, 5′-CAGGTCCAACTGCAGCAG-3′ and 5′-CTCTCAGCCGGCTCCCTCAGGG-3′; Figure 7C, 5′-GCGGAGCACCACAGTGCAACTGGGAC-3′ and 5′-AAAGACCTGCAGAGGCCATTCTTACC-3′; and Figure 7D, 5′-CACGTGGGCTCCAGCATT-3′ and 5′-TCACCAGTCATTTCTGCCTTTG-3′.
RNA isolation and RT. RNA was isolated by using TRIAzol (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the supplier’s protocol. poly(A) mRNA was prepared by using dT-beads (QIAGEN), and 500 ng of mRNA was reverse transcribed in a 20-μl reaction with 100 U SuperscripII (Invitrogen Corp.), 2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 U RNasin (all from Applied Biosystems), and 0.5 μg random hexanucleotide primers (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to our previously published protocol (47). Quantitative PCR was conducted according to our published procedures (27, 47) using 2× SYBR PCR mix (Applied Biosystems).
The authors thank Rebecca Hines-Boykin for invaluable technical help; Barbara Vilen for cell lines; Stephen Clarke, Michelle Staudt, James Papin, and Blossom Damania for critical reading and discussion; and Ethel Cesarman and Amy Chadburn for lymphoma evaluation. F.D. Fakhari conducted this work as part of her thesis for the Graduate Program in Microbiology and Immunology at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. Supported by the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science (grant HR03-0028), the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, the NIH (grant CA109232), and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: FSC, forward scatter; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; KS, Kaposi sarcoma; KSHV, Kaposi sarcoma–associated herpesvirus; LANA, latency-associated nuclear antigen; LPD, lymphoproliferative disease; MCD, multicentric Castleman disease; MZ, marginal zone; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; PEL, primary effusion lymphoma; PNA, peanut agglutinin.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.