Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Restoration of liver insulin signaling in Insr knockout mice fails to normalize hepatic insulin action
Haruka Okamoto, … , Domenico Accili, Luciano Rossetti
Haruka Okamoto, … , Domenico Accili, Luciano Rossetti
Published May 2, 2005
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2005;115(5):1314-1322. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI23096.
View: Text | PDF
Article Metabolism Article has an altmetric score of 4

Restoration of liver insulin signaling in Insr knockout mice fails to normalize hepatic insulin action

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Partial restoration of insulin receptor Insr expression in brain, liver, and pancreatic β cells is sufficient for rescuing Insr knockout mice from neonatal death, preventing diabetes ketoacidosis, and normalizing life span and reproductive function. However, the transgenically rescued mice (referred to as L1) have marked hyperinsulinemia, and approximately 30% develop late-onset type 2 diabetes. Analyses of protein expression indicated that L1 mice had modestly reduced Insr content but normal insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation in the liver. Conversely, L1 mice had a near complete ablation of Insr protein product in the arcuate and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus, which was associated with a failure to undergo insulin-dependent Akt phosphorylation in the hypothalamus. To test whether reconstitution of insulin signaling in the liver is sufficient for restoring in vivo hepatic insulin action, we performed euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp studies in conscious L1 and WT mice. During the clamp, L1 mice required an approximately 50% lower rate of glucose infusion than did WT controls, while the rate of glucose disappearance was not significantly altered. Conversely, the rate of glucose production was increased approximately 2-fold in L1 mice. Thus, restoration of hepatic insulin signaling in Insr knockout mice fails to normalize the in vivo response to insulin.

Authors

Haruka Okamoto, Silvana Obici, Domenico Accili, Luciano Rossetti

×

Figure 2

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Impact of Insr genotype on energy balance. (A) Body composition of 2- to...
Impact of Insr genotype on energy balance. (A) Body composition of 2- to 3-month-old L1 (white bars) and WT (black bars) mice (n = 5 each). Fat mass is significantly decreased and free-fat mass is increased in L1 versus WT mice. *P = 0.05. (B) Daily food intake was similar in both groups. (C) VO2 in L1 mice was significantly increased compared with that in WT mice. **P = 0.016. (D) Twenty-four–hour average resting RQ was significantly decreased in L1 mice versus WT mice. #P = 0.03. (E) PRCF from 24-hour calorimetry measurements. L1 mice (filled circles) display a consistent shift of RQ toward lower values compared to WT mice (crosses). Each curve is derived from 770 measurements of RQ from L1 and WT mice (n = 9 mice per group). (F) Activity measured as horizontal movement recorded over 24-hour period in L1 (thick line) and WT (thin line) mice. The values represent mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Referenced in 1 patents
Mentioned by 1 peer review sites
17 readers on Mendeley
See more details