BACKGROUND This study examined the underlying cellular mechanisms associated with insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic disease risk within subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in youth with obesity and IR compared with those without IR.METHODS Thirteen adolescents who were insulin sensitive (IS) and 17 adolescents with IR and obesity underwent a 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test and MRI to measure abdominal fat distribution and liver fat content. Lipolysis was determined by glycerol turnover ([2H5]-glycerol infusion) and adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) phosphorylation (Western blot) from SAT samples biopsied prior to and 30-minutes following insulin infusion during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HEC).RESULTS Glycerol turnover suppression during the HEC (first step) was lower in participants with IR compared with those with IS. Prior to insulin infusion, activated ATGL (reflected by the p-ATGL (Ser406)-to-ATGL ratio) was greater in participants with IR compared with those with IS and suppressed in response to a 30-minute insulin exposure in participants with IS, but not in those with IR. Lastly, greater ATGL inactivation is associated with greater glycerol suppression and lower liver fat.CONCLUSIONS Insulin-mediated inhibition of adipose tissue lipolysis via ATGL is dysregulated among adolescents with IR compared with those with IS, thereby serving as a vital mechanism linking glucose and insulin dysregulation and ectopic lipid storage within the liver.FUNDING This work was supported by funding from the NIH (R01-HD028016-25A1, T32- DK-007058, R01-DK124272, RO1-DK119968, R01MD015974, RO1-DK113984, P3-DK045735, RO1-DK133143, and RC2-DK120534) and the Robert E. Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust Mentored Research Award.
Aaron L. Slusher, Nicola Santoro, Alla Vash-Margita, Alfonso Galderisi, Pamela Hu, Fuyuze Tokoglu, Zhongyao Li, Elena Tarabra, Jordan Strober, Daniel F. Vatner, Gerald I. Shulman, Sonia Caprio
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 515 | 0 |
198 | 0 | |
Figure | 55 | 0 |
Table | 7 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 141 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 3 | 0 |
Totals | 919 | 0 |
Total Views | 919 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.