Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • A tough nut to crack
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 3

See more details

Referenced in 1 Wikipedia pages
1 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (2)

Advertisement

Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI18397

Salt-sensitive hypertension: if only it were as simple as rocket science

Timothy L. Reudelhuber

Clinical Research Institute of Montreal (IRCM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Address correspondence to: Timothy L. Reudelhuber, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal (IRCM), 110 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec H2W 1R7, Canada. Phone: (514) 987-5716; Fax: (514) 987-5717; E-mail: reudelt@ircm.qc.ca.

Find articles by Reudelhuber, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published April 15, 2003 - More info

Published in Volume 111, Issue 8 on April 15, 2003
J Clin Invest. 2003;111(8):1115–1116. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI18397.
© 2003 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published April 15, 2003 - Version history
View PDF

What? Salt and hypertension? Again? If your attention drifted and you haven’t been able to follow the debate for the last 30 years, I’d highly recommend reading the 1998 Science article appropriately entitled “The (political) science of salt” (1). Both the original article and the heated responses it generated are more entertaining than a ringside seat at a Saturday night wrestling match. Why can’t we agree on whether dietary salt is good or bad for people (or neither)? Some have suggested that the difficulty lies in the fact that the general population should be subclassified as salt “responders” and “non-responders”. Another possibility, strengthened by the work of Ni et al. (2) in this issue of the JCI, is that additional hormonal factors modulate our salt sensitivity, making it a moving target.

A tough nut to crack

Hormonal modulation of salt balance and blood volume is an indisputable truth in physiology. But does it play a critical role in hypertension? Genetic evidence certainly supports the possibility that it can. In humans, rare genetic disorders of salt transport in the kidney have been shown to be responsible for several forms of hyper- and hypotension including Liddle, Bartter, and Gitelman syndromes (reviewed in ref. 3). Nevertheless, there’s no clear evidence to date that the same genes that cause these disorders play a significant role in essential hypertension. But wait, maybe we just need to do a better job of subclassifying patients and regulating their diets when we do genetic screens. As an alternative and presumably simpler approach, animal models have been used. In the early 1960s, Dahl and colleagues reported that they had bred rats characterized by a salt-sensitive form of hypertension (4). These rats have been the subject of hundreds of research studies aimed at defining the genes and proteins responsible for salt-sensitivity. In spite of the fact that genetic heterogeneity and diet can be taken out of the equation with this approach, as of 3 years ago 24 chromosomal regions spread over 19 chromosomes had been found to contribute to hypertension in rats (5), with at least 8 of these regions having effects on blood pressure in the Dahl salt-sensitive strain. It now seems clear that although this approach still holds promise to uncover new targets in hypertension, it’s anything but simple. This is where the ability to knockout genes in mice comes in handy. In the current issue, Ni et al. show that mice having an impaired ability to make γ-melanocyte–stimulating hormone (γ-MSH) exhibit salt-sensitive hypertension (2).

γ-MSH is a small peptide hormone that is clipped out of the middle of the larger protein precursor proopiomelanocortin (POMC) by prohormone convertase 2 (PC2) (Figure 1). Expression of POMC in the pituitary gland results in the release of several hormones, including the melanocortins, into the circulation while its expression in the hypothalamus and brainstem leads to production of melanocortinergic neurotransmitters. In normal mice, γ-MSH increases in the circulation when the animals are placed on a high-salt diet. In contrast, in PC2-knockout mice γ-MSH does not increase and the mice develop hypertension. Of course this alone would not constitute strong evidence for the role of γ-MSH since PC2 is involved in generating a lot of other peptide and protein hormones including insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin. However, the authors also show that the hypertension seen in the high-salt–fed PC2-knockout animals can be corrected by administration of a synthetic γ-MSH analogue and that the same results are seen in mice in which the γ-MSH receptor, melanocortin receptor 3 (MC3-R), is knocked out. So why hasn’t γ-MSH been implicated in salt-sensitive hypertension until now? Part of the reason is certainly the multitude of neuroendocrine signals mediated by the other peptides produced along with γ-MSH when POMC is processed (Figure 1), making it hard to isolate γ-MSH–specific actions in a physiological setting. In fact, 5 receptors have been identified to date — MC1-R, MC2-R, MC3-R, MC4-R, and MC5-R — for the melanocortin hormones alone, with more possibly to come. These receptors have a broad tissue distribution and they mediate a range of physiological responses depending on their location. These include: (a) pigmentation (MC1-R); (b) modulation of corticosterone levels (MC2-R); (c) appetite suppression and metabolic activation (MC4-R); (d) thermoregulation and water repulsion (MC5-R); and (e) inflammation (MC1-R and MC3-R). It’s easy to imagine that several of these responses might have masked or complicated the analysis of blood pressure effects of γ-MSH.

Schematic representation of the cleavage of pituitary proopiomelanocortin (Figure 1

Schematic representation of the cleavage of pituitary proopiomelanocortin (POMC) by prohormone convertase (PC) enzymes 1 and 2. Generated peptides include α-, β-, and γ-melanocyte–stimulating hormone (MSH), β- and γ- lipotropic hormone (LPH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), β-endorphin (β-END), and the amino-terminal (NT), joining (JP), and CLIP peptides. Note that the release of γ-MSH requires a cleavage by PC2 at both ends.

Does this mean that γ-MSH is the cause of salt-induced hypertension in humans? Not by a long shot! The knockout of other mouse genes, including those for atrial natriuretic peptide (6) and its receptor (7), the prostaglandin receptor EP2 (8), and the bradykinin receptor (9), also leads to salt-sensitive hypertension. However, none of these as yet has been linked to the condition in humans. Moreover, the existence of γ-MSH in humans is still a matter of some debate. Nevertheless, the possibility that hormones with both central and peripheral actions like γ-MSH could cause our salt-sensitivity to fluctuate is an attractive hypothesis to test in a field where salient explanations are scarce.

Footnotes

See the related article beginning on page 1251.

Conflict of interest: The author has declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Nonstandard abbreviations used: γ-melanocyte–stimulating hormone (γ-MSH); proopiomelanocortin (POMC); prohormone convertase (PC); melanocortin receptor (MC-R).

References
  1. Taubes, G. The (political) science of salt. Science. 1998. 281:898-901, 903–907.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  2. Ni, X-P, Pearce, D, Butler, AA, Cone, RD, Humphreys, MH. Genetic disruption of γ-melanocyte–stimulating hormone signaling leads to salt-sensitive hypertension in the mouse. J. Clin. Invest. 2003. 111:1251-1258. doi:10.1172/JCI200316993.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Lifton, RP, Gharavi, AG, Geller, DS. Molecular mechanisms of human hypertension. Cell. 1998. 281:545-556.
  4. Dahl, LK, Heine, M, Tassinari, L. Role of genetic factors in susceptibility to experimental hypertension due to chronic excess salt ingestion. Nature. 1962. 194:480-482.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Rapp, JP. Genetic analysis of inherited hypertension in the rat. Physiol. Rev. 2000. 80:135-172.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  6. John, SW, et al. Genetic decreases in atrial natriuretic peptide and salt-sensitive hypertension. Science. 1995. 267:679-681.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  7. Oliver, PM, et al. Natriuretic peptide receptor 1 expression influences blood pressures of mice in a dose-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998. 95:2547-2551.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  8. Kennedy, CR, et al. Salt-sensitive hypertension and reduced fertility in mice lacking the prostaglandin EP2 receptor. Nat. Med. 1999. 5:217-220.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  9. Alfie, ME, Yang, XP, Hess, F, Carretero, OA. Salt-sensitive hypertension in bradykinin B2 receptor knockout mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996. 224:625-630.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (April 15, 2003): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 3
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (2)

Go to

  • Top
  • A tough nut to crack
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Referenced in 1 Wikipedia pages
1 readers on Mendeley
See more details