Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is etiologically complex, with well-documented genetic and nongenetic origins. In this Review, we speculate that the development of IPF requires two hits: the first establishes a vulnerable bronchoalveolar epithelium, and the second triggers mechanisms that reprogram distal epithelia to initiate and perpetuate a profibrotic phenotype. While vulnerability of the bronchoalveolar epithelia is most often driven by common or rare genetic variants, subsequent injury of the bronchoalveolar epithelia results in persistent changes in cell biology that disrupt tissue homeostasis and activate fibroblasts. The dynamic biology of IPF can best be contextualized etiologically and temporally, including stages of vulnerability, early disease, and persistent and progressive lung fibrosis. These dimensions of IPF highlight critical mechanisms that adversely disrupt epithelial function, activate fibroblasts, and lead to lung remodeling. Together with better recognition of early disease, this conceptual approach should lead to the development of novel therapeutics directed at the etiologic and temporal drivers of lung fibrosis that will ultimately transform the care of patients with IPF from palliative to curative.
James P. Bridges, Eszter K. Vladar, Jonathan S. Kurche, Andrei Krivoi, Ian T. Stancil, Evgenia Dobrinskikh, Yan Hu, Sarah K. Sasse, Joyce S. Lee, Rachel Z. Blumhagen, Ivana V. Yang, Anthony N. Gerber, Anna L. Peljto, Christopher M. Evans, Elizabeth F. Redente, David W.H. Riches, David A. Schwartz
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 2,073 | 0 |
527 | 0 | |
Figure | 319 | 0 |
Table | 88 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 19 | 0 |
Totals | 3,026 | 0 |
Total Views | 3,026 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.