BACKGROUND Recent studies conducted in individuals who survived COVID-19 suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk of dyslipidemia. However, it remains unclear whether this augmented risk is confirmed in the general population and how this phenomenon is affecting the overall burden of cardiometabolic diseases.METHODS To address these aspects, we conducted a 6-year longitudinal study to examine the broader effects of COVID-19 on dyslipidemia incidence in a real-world population (228,266 individuals) residing in Naples in southern Italy. The pre–COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups were balanced for demographic and clinical factors using propensity score matching.RESULTS Our analysis spans a period of 3 years during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022), comparing dyslipidemia incidence with pre-pandemic data (2017–2019), with a follow-up of at least 1,095 days corresponding to 21,349,215 person-years. During the COVID-19 period, we detected an increased risk of developing any dyslipidemia when compared with the pre–COVID-19 triennium (OR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19–1.39). Importantly, these estimates were adjusted for comorbidities by a multivariate analysis.CONCLUSIONS Taken together, our data reveal a notable rise in dyslipidemia incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the utility of establishing specialized clinical monitoring protocols for patients who survive COVID-19 to mitigate the risk of developing dyslipidemia.
Valentina Trimarco, Raffaele Izzo, Stanislovas S. Jankauskas, Mario Fordellone, Giuseppe Signoriello, Maria Virginia Manzi, Maria Lembo, Paola Gallo, Giovanni Esposito, Roberto Piccinocchi, Francesco Rozza, Carmine Morisco, Pasquale Mone, Gaetano Piccinocchi, Fahimeh Varzideh, Bruno Trimarco, Gaetano Santulli
Usage data is cumulative from September 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 4,949 | 47 |
806 | 12 | |
Figure | 256 | 0 |
Table | 84 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 217 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 72 | 0 |
Totals | 6,384 | 64 |
Total Views | 6,448 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.