Bacterial biofilms are pervasive and recalcitrant to current antimicrobials, causing numerous infections. Iron oxide-nanozymes, including an FDA-approved formulation (ferumoxytol, FMX), show potential against biofilm infections via catalytic activation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). However, clinical evidence on its efficacy and therapeutic mechanisms is lacking. Here, we investigate whether FMX-nanozymes can treat chronic biofilm infections and compare their bioactivity to gold-standard sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), a potent but caustic disinfectant. Clinical performance was assessed in patients with apical periodontitis, an intractable endodontic infection affecting half of the global adult population. Data show robust antibiofilm activity by a single application of FMX with H2O2 achieving results comparable to NaOCl without adverse effects. FMX binds efficiently to bacterial pathogens Enterococcus faecalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum and remains catalytically active without being affected by dental tissues. This allows for effective eradication of endodontic biofilms via on-site free-radical generation without inducing cytotoxicity. Unexpectedly, FMX promotes growth of stem cells of apical papilla (SCAP), with transcriptomic analyses revealing upregulation of proliferation-associated pathways and downregulation of cell-cycle suppressor genes. Notably, FMX activates SCAP pluripotency and WNT/NOTCH signaling that induces its osteogenic capacity. Together, we show FMX nanozymes are clinically effective against severe chronic biofilm infection with pathogen targeting and unique stem cell-stimulatory properties, offering a regenerative approach to antimicrobial therapy.
Alaa Babeer, Yuan Liu, Zhi Ren, Zhenting Xiang, Min Jun Oh, Nil Kanatha Pandey, Aurea Simon-Soro, Ranran Huang, Bekir Karabucak, David P. Cormode, Chider Chen, Hyun Koo
Usage data is cumulative from November 2024 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 542 | 0 |
123 | 0 | |
Supplemental data | 50 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 11 | 0 |
Totals | 726 | 0 |
Total Views | 726 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.