BACKGROUND There is uncertainty about the timing of booster vaccination against COVID-19 in highly vaccinated populations during the present endemic phase of COVID-19. Studies focused on primary vaccination have previously suggested improved immunity with a longer interval between the first and second vaccine doses.METHODS We conducted a randomized, controlled trial (November 2022–August 2023) and assigned 52 fully vaccinated adults to an immediate or a 3-month delayed bivalent Spikevax mRNA booster vaccine. Follow-up visits were completed for 48 participants (n = 24 per arm), with collection of saliva and plasma samples following each visit.RESULTS The rise in neutralizing antibody responses to ancestral and Omicron strains were almost identical between the immediate and delayed vaccination arms. Analyses of plasma and salivary antibody responses (IgG, IgA), plasma antibody-dependent phagocytic activity, and the decay kinetics of antibody responses were similar between the 2 arms. Symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 49% (21 of 49) participants over the median 11.5 months of follow-up and were also similar between the 2 arms.CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that there was no benefit in delaying COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination in preimmune populations during the present endemic phase of COVID-19.TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number 12622000411741 (https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12622000411741).FUNDING National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (program grant App1149990) and Medical Research Future Fund (App2005544).
Wen Shi Lee, Jennifer Audsley, Mai-Chi Trieu, Arnold Reynaldi, L. Carissa Aurelia, Palak H. Mehta, Joanne Patterson, Helen E. Kent, Julie Nguyen, Thakshila Amarasena, Robyn Esterbauer, Ebene R. Haycroft, Pradhipa Ramanathan, Miles P. Davenport, Timothy E. Schlub, Joseph Sasadeusz, Adam K. Wheatley, Amy W. Chung, Jennifer A. Juno, Kevin J. Selva, Stephen J. Kent
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 2,265 | 59 |
634 | 34 | |
Figure | 339 | 1 |
Supplemental data | 277 | 6 |
Citation downloads | 153 | 0 |
Totals | 3,668 | 100 |
Total Views | 3,768 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.