A leading cause of mortality after influenza infection is the development of a secondary bacterial pneumonia. In the absence of a bacterial superinfection, prescribing antibacterial therapies is not indicated but has become a common clinical practice for those presenting with a respiratory viral illness. In a murine model, we found that antibiotic use during influenza infection impaired the lung innate immunologic defenses toward a secondary challenge with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Antibiotics augment lung eosinophils, which have inhibitory effects on macrophage function through the release of major basic protein. Moreover, we demonstrated that antibiotic treatment during influenza infection caused a fungal dysbiosis that drove lung eosinophilia and impaired MRSA clearance. Finally, we evaluated 3 cohorts of hospitalized patients and found that eosinophils positively correlated with antibiotic use, systemic inflammation, and worsened outcomes. Altogether, our work demonstrates a detrimental effect of antibiotic treatment during influenza infection that has harmful immunologic consequences via recruitment of eosinophils to the lungs, thereby increasing the risk of developing a secondary bacterial infection.
Marilia Sanches Santos Rizzo Zuttion, Tanyalak Parimon, Stephanie A. Bora, Changfu Yao, Katherine Lagree, Catherine A. Gao, Richard G. Wunderink, Georgios D. Kitsios, Alison Morris, Yingze Zhang, Bryan J. McVerry, Matthew E. Modes, Alberto M. Marchevsky, Barry R. Stripp, Christopher M. Soto, Ying Wang, Kimberly Merene, Silvia Cho, Blandine L. Victor, Ivan Vujkovic-Cvijin, Suman Gupta, Suzanne L. Cassel, Fayyaz S. Sutterwala, Suzanne Devkota, David M. Underhill, Peter Chen
Usage data is cumulative from September 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 4,181 | 115 |
1,129 | 24 | |
Figure | 254 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 660 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 94 | 0 |
Totals | 6,318 | 140 |
Total Views | 6,458 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.