Given the global surge in autoimmune diseases, it is critical to evaluate emerging therapeutic interventions. Despite numerous new targeted immunomodulatory therapies, comprehensive approaches to apply and evaluate the effects of these treatments longitudinally are lacking. Here, we leveraged advances in programmable-phage immunoprecipitation methodology to explore the modulation, or lack thereof, of autoantibody profiles, proteome-wide, in both health and disease. Using a custom set of over 730,000 human-derived peptides, we demonstrated that each individual, regardless of disease state, possesses a distinct and complex constellation of autoreactive antibodies. For each individual, the set of resulting autoreactivites constituted a unique immunological fingerprint, or “autoreactome,” that was remarkably stable over years. Using the autoreactome as a primary output, we evaluated the relative effectiveness of various immunomodulatory therapies in altering autoantibody repertoires. We found that therapies targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) profoundly altered an individual’s autoreactome, while anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 therapies had minimal effects. These data both confirm that the autoreactome comprises autoantibodies secreted by plasma cells and strongly suggest that BCMA or other plasma cell–targeting therapies may be highly effective in treating currently refractory autoantibody-mediated diseases.
Aaron Bodansky, David J.L. Yu, Alysa Rallistan, Muge Kalaycioglu, Jim Boonyaratanakornkit, Damian J. Green, Jordan Gauthier, Cameron J. Turtle, Kelsey Zorn, Brian O’Donovan, Caleigh Mandel-Brehm, James Asaki, Hannah Kortbawi, Andrew F. Kung, Elze Rackaityte, Chung-Yu Wang, Aditi Saxena, Kimberly de Dios, Gianvito Masi, Richard J. Nowak, Kevin C. O’Connor, Hao Li, Valentina E. Diaz, Rowan Saloner, Kaitlin B. Casaletto, Eva Q. Gontrum, Brandon Chan, Joel H. Kramer, Michael R. Wilson, Paul J. Utz, Joshua A. Hill, Shaun W. Jackson, Mark S. Anderson, Joseph L. DeRisi
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 6,385 | 557 |
1,694 | 213 | |
Figure | 741 | 2 |
Supplemental data | 523 | 34 |
Citation downloads | 202 | 0 |
Totals | 9,545 | 806 |
Total Views | 10,351 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.