In utero gene editing (IUGE) is a potential treatment for inherited diseases that cause pathology before or soon after birth. Preexisting immunity to adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors and Cas9 endonuclease may limit postnatal gene editing. The tolerogenic fetal immune system minimizes a fetal immune barrier to IUGE. However, the ability of maternal immunity to limit fetal gene editing remains a question. We investigated whether preexisting maternal immunity to AAV or Cas9 impairs IUGE. Using a combination of fluorescent reporter mice and a murine model of a metabolic liver disease, we demonstrated that maternal anti-AAV IgG antibodies were efficiently transferred from dam to fetus and impaired IUGE in a maternal titer–dependent fashion. By contrast, maternal cellular immunity was inefficiently transferred to the fetus, and neither maternal cellular nor humoral immunity to Cas9 impaired IUGE. Using human umbilical cord and maternal blood samples collected from mid- to late-gestation pregnancies, we demonstrated that maternal-fetal transmission of anti-AAV IgG was inefficient in midgestation compared with term, suggesting that the maternal immune barrier to clinical IUGE would be less relevant at midgestation. These findings support immunologic advantages for IUGE and inform maternal preprocedural testing protocols and exclusion criteria for future clinical trials.
John S. Riley, Valerie L. Luks, Cara L. Berkowitz, Ana Maria Dumitru, Nicole J. Kus, Apeksha Dave, Pallavi Menon, Monique E. De Paepe, Rajan Jain, Li Li, Lorraine Dugoff, Christina Paidas Teefey, Mohamad-Gabriel Alameh, Philip W. Zoltick, William H. Peranteau
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 2,187 | 248 |
455 | 64 | |
Figure | 729 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 301 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 168 | 0 |
Totals | 3,840 | 315 |
Total Views | 4,155 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.