Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Abnormalities of nasal potential difference measurement in Liddle's syndrome.
E Baker, … , P Corvol, G MacGregor
E Baker, … , P Corvol, G MacGregor
Published July 1, 1998
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1998;102(1):10-14. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI1795.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Abnormalities of nasal potential difference measurement in Liddle's syndrome.

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In Liddle's syndrome, a rare inherited form of hypertension, epithelial sodium channel mutations appear to cause high blood pressure by increasing sodium reabsorption through sodium channels in the renal distal tubule. This increase in channel activity has not been confirmed previously by in vivo measurement. We have made transnasal potential difference measurements (effective in detection of increased sodium channel activity in cystic fibrosis) in three brothers with genetically proven Liddle's syndrome, their unaffected sister, and 40 normotensive controls. Maximum potential difference after 2 wk off treatment in the affected brothers was -30.4+/-1.2 mV (values mean+/-SD, lumen-negative with respect to submucosa) and was significantly more lumen-negative than that of the control group (-18.6+/-6.8 mV, P = 0.0228) or the unaffected sister (-18.25 mV, P < 0.01). The change in potential difference after topical application of 10(-)4 M amiloride was greater in the Liddle's patients, 14.0+/-2.1 mV, than in controls (7.9+/-3.9 mV, P = 0.0126) or the unaffected sister (5.5 mV, P < 0.05). This is the first in vivo demonstration of increased sodium channel activity in Liddle's syndrome. If these results are confirmed in other kindreds with this condition, then nasal potential difference measurements could provide a simple clinical test for Liddle's syndrome.

Authors

E Baker, X Jeunemaitre, A J Portal, P Grimbert, N Markandu, A Persu, P Corvol, G MacGregor

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 119 19
PDF 49 20
Citation downloads 50 0
Totals 218 39
Total Views 257
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts