BACKGROUND.Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a leading cause of fungal pneumonia, but its diagnosis primarily relies on invasive bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens that are difficult to obtain. Oropharyngeal swabs and serum could improve the PCP diagnostic workflow, and we hypothesized that CRISPR could enhance assay sensitivity to allow robust P. jirovecii diagnosis using swabs and serum. Herein we describe the development of an ultrasensitive RT-PCR-coupled CRISPR assay with high active-infection specificity in infant swabs and adult BAL and serum. METHODS. Mouse analyses employed an RT-PCR CRISPR assay to analyze P. murina transcripts in wild-type and Rag2–/– mouse lung RNA, BAL, and serum at 2-, 4-, and 6-weeks post-infection. Human studies used an optimized RT-PCR CRISPR assay to detect P. jirovecii transcripts in infant oropharyngeal swab samples, adult serum, and adult BAL specimens from P. jirovecii-infected and P. jirovecii-non-infected patients. RESULTS. The P. murina assays sensitively detected Pneumocystis RNA in the serum of infected mice throughout infection. Oropharyngeal swab CRISPR assay results identified infants infected with P. jirovecii with greater sensitivity (96.3% vs. 66.7%) and specificity (100% vs. 90.6%) than RT-qPCR compared to mtLSU standard marker, and CRISPR results achieved higher sensitivity than RT-qPCR results (93.3% vs. 26.7%) in adult serum specimens. CONCLUSION. Since swabs are routinely collected in pediatric pneumonia patients and serum is easier to obtain than BAL, this assay approach could improve the accuracy and timing of pediatric and adult Pneumocystis diagnosis by achieving specificity for active infection and potentially avoiding the requirement for BAL specimens.
Brady M. Youngquist, Ayanda Trevor Mnguni, Dora Pungan, Rachel P.J. Lai, Guixiang Dai, Chun Fai Ng, Amy Samson, Yasmean Abdelgaliel, Christopher J. Lyon, Bo Ning, Shahid Husain, Sean Wasserman, Jay K. Kolls, Tony Y. Hu
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 591 | 0 |
139 | 0 | |
Supplemental data | 50 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 5 | 0 |
Totals | 785 | 0 |
Total Views | 785 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.