Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2024;134(18):e176507. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI176507.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty significantly affects morbidity and mortality rates in the older population (age >65 years). Age-related degenerative diseases are influenced by the intestinal microbiota. However, limited research exists on alterations in the intestinal microbiota in frail older individuals, and the effectiveness of prebiotic intervention for treating frailty remains uncertain.OBJECTIVE We sought to examine the biological characteristics of the intestinal microbiome in frail older individuals and assess changes in both frailty status and gut microbiota following intervention with a prebiotic blend consisting of inulin and oligofructose.METHODS The study consisted of 3 components: an observational analysis with a sample size of 1,693, a cross-sectional analysis (n = 300), and a multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (n = 200). Body composition, commonly used scales, biochemical markers, intestinal microbiota, and metabolites were examined in 3 groups of older individuals (nonfrail, prefrail, and frail). Subsequently, changes in these indicators were reevaluated after a 3-month intervention using the prebiotic mixture for the prefrail and frail groups.RESULTS The intervention utilizing a combination of prebiotics significantly improved frailty and renal function among the older population, leading to notable increases in protein levels, body fat percentage, walking speed, and grip strength. Additionally, it stimulated an elevation in gut probiotic count and induced alterations in microbial metabolite expression levels as well as corresponding metabolic pathways.CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest a potential link between changes in the gut microbiota and frailty in older adults. Prebiotics have the potential to modify the gut microbiota and metabolome, resulting in improved frailty status and prevention of its occurrence.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03995342.
Authors
Jie Yang, Liming Hou, Anhui Wang, Lei Shang, Xin Jia, Rong Xu, Xiaoming Wang
Usage data is cumulative from September 2024 through January 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,074 | 377 |
| 589 | 104 | |
| Figure | 248 | 1 |
| Table | 395 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 177 | 13 |
| Citation downloads | 66 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,549 | 495 |
| Total Views | 5,044 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)