BACKGROUND Disease due to dengue viruses is a growing global health threat, causing 100–400 million cases annually. An ideal dengue vaccine should demonstrate durable protection against all 4 serotypes in phase III efficacy trials, however the lack of circulating serotypes may lead to incomplete efficacy data. Controlled human infection models help downselect vaccine candidates and supply critical data to supplement efficacy trials. We evaluated the efficacy of a leading live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate, TV005, against infection with a newly established dengue serotype 3 or an established serotype 2 challenge virus.METHODS Two randomized, controlled clinical trials were performed. In study 1, a total of 42 participants received TV005 or placebo (n = 21 each), and 6 months later, all were challenged with dengue 2 virus (rDEN2Δ30) at a dose of 103 PFU. In study 2, a total of 23 participants received TV005 and 20 received placebo, and 6 months later, all were challenged with 104 PFU dengue 3 virus (rDEN3Δ30). The study participants were closely monitored for safety, viremia, and immunologic responses. Infection, measured by post-challenge viremia, and the occurrence of rash and neutropenia were the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included safety, immunologic, and virologic profiles following vaccination with TV005 and subsequent challenge with the rDEN2Δ30 or rDEN3Δ30 strain.RESULTS TV005 was well tolerated and protected all vaccinated volunteers from viremia with DENV2 or DENV3 (none infected in either group). Placebo recipients had post-challenge viremia (100% in study 1, 85% in study 2), and all experienced rash following challenge with either serotype.CONCLUSIONS TV005 is a leading tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate that fully protected against infection with DENV2 and DENV3 in an established controlled human infection model.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02317900 and NCT02873260.FUNDING Intramural Research Program, NIH (contract HHSN272200900010C).
Kristen K. Pierce, Anna P. Durbin, Mary-Claire R. Walsh, Marya Carmolli, Beulah P. Sabundayo, Dorothy M. Dickson, Sean A. Diehl, Stephen S. Whitehead, Beth D. Kirkpatrick
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 2,919 | 1,277 |
679 | 256 | |
Figure | 355 | 0 |
Table | 710 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 137 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 116 | 0 |
Totals | 4,916 | 1,537 |
Total Views | 6,453 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.