Advertisement
ArticleImmunology Free access | 10.1172/JCI17129
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by McLoughlin, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by Witowski, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by Robson, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by Wilkinson, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by Hurst, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by Williams, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by Williams, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by Rose-John, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by Jones, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom2 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Cell Biology Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom3 Rheumatology Research Laboratories, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom4 Kiel Institut für Biochemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Address correspondence to: Nicholas Topley, Institute of Nephrology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-29-20748432; Fax: 44-29-20748470; E-mail: topley@cf.ac.uk.
Find articles by Topley, N. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published August 15, 2003 - More info
Regulated recruitment and clearance of neutrophils (PMN) is the hallmark of competent host defense and resolution of inflammation. We now report that IFN-γ controls PMN infiltration and modulates IL-6 signaling through its soluble receptor (sIL-6R) to promote their apoptosis and clearance. Induction of peritoneal inflammation in IFN-γ–deficient (IFN-γ–/–) mice emphasized that the initial rate of PMN recruitment was impaired. This defect in PMN recruitment was also associated with the suppressed intraperitoneal expression of IL-1β and IL-6. Reconstitution of IFN-γ signaling restored the rate of PMN infiltration and IL-6 levels and was accompanied by normalization of PMN-activating CXC chemokine expression. To test whether local IL-6 signaling modulated PMN recruitment, inflammation was induced in IFN-γ–/– and IL-6–/– mice and cytokine signaling adapted by intraperitoneal sIL-6R–IL-6 fusion protein (HYPER-IL-6) or IFN-γ. Although HYPER-IL-6 attenuated PMN influx in IFN-γ–/– mice, IFN-γ had no effect on PMN infiltration in IL-6–/– mice. Examination of the leukocyte infiltrate from IFN-γ–/–, IL-6–/–, and wild-type mice showed that apoptosis was aberrant in the absence of IFN-γ and IL-6 as a result of impaired sIL-6R signaling. These data emphasize a pivotal role for IFN-γ in regulating innate immunity through control of both the recruitment and clearance phases of PMN trafficking.
Although IFN-γ plays a central role in controlling the host’s response to bacterial and viral infection, the precise cellular mechanisms that contribute to this obligate role in host defense have not been fully elucidated (1). These IFN-γ–dependent events depend exclusively on signal transducer and activator of transcription factor 1 (STAT1) activation, since mice lacking this signal transducer are defective in their ability to resolve bacterial and viral infections (2–4). That IFN-γ is important in regulating host defense is emphasized by evidence of its effect on leukocyte recruitment. In this respect, IFN-γ can both enhance and suppress chemokine secretion in response to proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α), modulate chemokine receptor expression, and affect cellular adhesion and transmigration (5–10). In vivo, however, it is unclear whether these actions on leukocyte trafficking are a direct result of IFN-γ or occur through its modulation of other mediator cascades during the inflammatory response. Recent data, however, suggest that the initial activation of resident CD4 T cells to produce IFN-γ (and IL-17) are important in directing neutrophil (PMN) recruitment and in resolving bacterial infection (11–13).
During acute inflammation, PMN trafficking is tightly regulated to provide effective host defense without promoting tissue injury. Initially, PMN are recruited from the circulation toward sites of inflammatory insult or infection in response to local secretion of neutrophil-activating chemokines containing the ELR amino acid motif (ELR+) (14). As inflammation proceeds, or infection subsides, PMN are removed in a controlled manner to prevent persistent tissue necrosis (15). The initial phase of PMN clearance results from the downregulation of local ELR+ CXC chemokine expression and a switch to other chemokines selective for the attraction of mononuclear cells (MNC) (16). Central to the removal of PMN is the process of programmed cell death (apoptosis), which renders the cells susceptible to nonphlogistic phagocytosis by the MNC infiltrate. The controlled process of PMN trafficking thus provides an effective mechanism for limiting inflammation-induced tissue damage. Ultimately, this leads to clearance of infection and resolution of inflammation (13, 15, 17). Consequently, the pattern of PMN infiltration encountered during an inflammatory episode is defined by the temporal and differential regulation of chemokines and PMN apoptosis.
To define the regulatory events that dictate the pattern of leukocyte trafficking encountered during inflammation, we have used an established murine model of acute peritoneal inflammation using either a cell-free supernatant derived from Staphylococcus epidermidis or IL-1β as a stimulus (8, 16). This model has allowed the examination of the temporal changes in leukocyte infiltration and inflammatory and chemotactic mediator expression. Changes in this model closely resemble those observed in human bacterial peritonitis characterized by temporal changes in the expression patterns of both proinflammatory and chemotactic cytokines, the rapid recruitment of PMN, and their subsequent replacement by a more sustained influx of MNC (16). Although the factors that orchestrate resolution of acute inflammation and restoration of normal tissue architecture are not fully defined, we have recently characterized important roles for both IL-6, through its soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), and IFN-γ signaling in regulating the transition between PMN and MNC infiltration (8, 16). In the present study, we extend these observations and have identified that IFN-γ dictates the pattern of PMN recruitment encountered by affecting the local activities of IL-1β and IL-6. In this way, IFN-γ is able to tightly control the initial recruitment of PMN and promote their subsequent clearance to ensure effective host defense and resolution of inflammation.
Reagents. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) unless otherwise stated. Recombinant human IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ (107 U/mg of protein), and soluble gp130 (sgp130) were from R&D Systems (Abingdon, United Kingdom). Recombinant murine IL-1β and IFN-γ were from Peprotech Ltd. (London, United Kingdom). Endotoxin levels in recombinant cytokines were less than 0.1ng/μg (1 EU/μg) of protein. Tissue culture reagents were from GibcoBRL/Life Technologies (Paisley, United Kingdom), and all culture flasks and multiwell plates were obtained from Falcon (BD Biosciences, Oxford, United Kingdom). PBS (pH 7.4) was obtained from GibcoBRL/Life Technologies. HYPER-IL-6 was prepared as previously described (18) and stored at –70°C. A fresh aliquot was used for each experiment.
Isolation and culture of human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC) were isolated by tryptic digestion of greater omental tissue obtained from consenting patients undergoing abdominal surgery and characterized as previously described (19). All experiments were performed with confluent HPMC from the second passage. Cells were washed and growth arrested for 48 hours in serum-free culture medium before cytokine stimulation. Growth- arrested HPMC were stimulated at 37°C under the conditions specified in the figure legends. Culture supernatants were harvested, centrifuged to remove cellular debris, and stored at –70°C until assayed by ELISA. All data for in vitro cytokine production is expressed in picograms per 105 HPMC.
Northern blot analysis. Total cellular RNA was extracted from HPMC using RNA Isolator (Genosys Biotechnologies Ltd., Poole, United Kingdom). Ten micrograms of total cellular RNA was fractionated in a formaldehyde/1% agarose gel. RNA was transferred overnight to nylon membrane (Boehringer-Mannheim, Lewis, United Kingdom) by capillary action and fixed by UV irradiation. Membranes were preincubated in hybridization solution (5× SSC, 0.1% N-lauroylsarcosine, 0.02% [vol/vol] SDS, 1% [wt/vol] Boehringer-Mannheim blocking reagent) for 1 hour at 42°C. Blots were hybridized overnight at 42°C with a digoxigenin (DIG) -labeled oligonucleotide probe (10 ng/ml) for human IL-6 (R&D Systems). Membranes were washed and nonspecific binding sites blocked by incubating the membrane for 30 minutes in 1% (wt/vol) blocking reagent. Labeled transcripts were detected using an alkaline phosphatase–conjugated anti-DIG antibody (1:10,000 dilution; Boehringer-Mannheim) and visualized by autoradiography using the chemiluminescent substrate CSPD (Boehringer-Mannheim). Membranes were stripped in boiling 0.1% (wt/vol) SDS (twice for 30 minutes each) and reprobed with a DIG-labeled oligonucleotide for β-actin (10 ng/ml, R & D Systems). Blots were developed as described above. Autoradiographs were quantified by densitometry and expressed as a ratio of the housekeeping gene β-actin.
Analysis of nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts were prepared from HPMC using a rapid technique for the extraction of DNA binding proteins. Briefly, cells were harvested in ice-cold PBS (pH 7.4) and pelleted by centrifugation. Cells were resuspended in ice-cold buffer A (10 mm HEPES-KOH [pH 7.9], 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM PMSF) and incubated on ice for 10 minutes. The cell pellet was collected by centrifugation, resuspended in buffer B (20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.9], 25% glycerol, 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.3 mM DTT, 0.2 mM PMSF), and incubated on ice for 20 minutes to allow for high salt extraction. Cellular debris was removed by brief high-speed centrifugation (1200 g for 10 seconds at 4°C), and the resulting supernatants (nuclear extract) were collected. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) were performed as previously described (20). Oligonucleotides containing consensus motifs for NF-κB (5′-gaTCCATGGGGAATTCCCC-3′ and 3′-AGGTACCCCTTAAGGGGag-5′) were annealed for use in EMSA. These double-stranded fragments were labeled with [α32P]dTTP (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Amersham, United Kingdom) using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. The composition of protein/DNA complexes was determined by supershift assays using rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific for NF-κB–p50 (sc-7178) and NF-κB–p65 (sc-109) (Santa Cruz Biotech Inc., Santa Cruz, California, USA).
Mouse strains. All experimental procedures were carried out under Home Office project license 40/2131. Inbred wild-type C57/BL6 mice were purchased from Charles River UK Ltd (Margate, United Kingdom). IL-6–deficient (IL-6–/–) and IFN-γ–deficient (IFN-γ–/–) mice, both on the C57/BL6 background, were bred in house from breeding pairs originally purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA) (21, 22). All mice were maintained under barrier conditions and were pathogen free as assessed by regular microbiological screening. Mice were between 6 and 12 weeks of age and were weight matched for each experiment.
Preparation of S. epidermidis cell-free supernatant and definition of biological activity. S. epidermidis cell-free supernatant (SES) was prepared as previously described (16, 23). Supernatants were free of live bacteria, as assessed by lack of growth on diagnostic sensitivity testing agar. Lyophilized stocks of SES were stored at –70°C. The biological activity of SES was determined by monitoring IL-6 secretion from RAW 264 mouse macrophages (European Collection of Cell Cultures, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom). RAW 264 cells were maintained in 10% FCS/DMEM F12 MIX supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 U/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and a 1:100 dilution of nonessential amino acids at 37°C/5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. For bioassay, RAW 264 cells were adhered to 24-well plates at a density of 7.5 × 104 cells per well and stimulated with serial dilutions of lyophilized SES. After 24 hours, supernatants were collected and IL-6 was quantified. For experimental reproducibility, SES fractions (equivalent to 5 × 104 CFU/ml) were only used when IL-6 secretion by RAW 264 exceeded 300 pg per 104 cells.
Induction of acute peritoneal inflammation. Peritoneal inflammation was induced in vivo by administration of SES or recombinant murine IL-1β. Groups of wild-type, IFN-γ–/–, and IL-6–/– mice received 500 μl of SES, IL-1β, or PBS through the intraperitoneal route. At defined time points, animals were sacrificed, and their peritoneum was lavaged with 2 ml of ice-cold PBS. The composition of the leukocyte infiltrate was assessed using a Coulter counter (Coulter Z2, Beckman-Coulter UK Ltd., High Wycombe, United Kingdom) and by differential cell staining. Lavage fluids were rendered cell free by centrifugation for analysis of inflammatory mediators. To modulate the inflammatory response, wild-type, IFN-γ–/–, or IL-6–/– mice were treated intraperitoneally with 500 μl of SES, IL-1β, (100 ng per mouse), IFN-γ (0.05–50 U per mouse), HYPER-IL-6 (40 ng per mouse), and sgp130 (150 ng per mouse) as indicated in the figure legends. PBS was used as a control. At intervals after administration, mice were sacrificed and lavage parameters assessed.
Cytokine and chemokine production. Murine IL-6, KC, and IL-1β levels were quantified using commercially available ELISA kits (R&D Systems). Human IL-6 was quantified using matched antibody pairs from R&D Systems in an ELISA (24).
Assessment of apoptosis in vivo (annexin V/propidium iodide staining). At defined intervals after SES stimulation, mice were sacrificed and the peritoneal cavity lavaged. Total leukocytes were recovered, and apoptosis was determined by double staining with annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) according to the protocol instructions (R&D Systems). The proportion of apoptotic leukocytes was assessed using a Becton-Dickinson FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Oxford, United Kingdom) using defined forward- and side-scatter settings for mouse leukocytes. Analysis of annexin V staining was performed on gated neutrophils, and the quadrants were aligned in accordance with autofluorescent controls. Ten thousand gated events were acquired for each sample.
Assessment of apoptosis in vivo (caspase 3 activity). After SES stimulation, mice were sacrificed and total leukocytes recovered from the peritoneal cavity by lavage. Caspase 3 activity was assessed in cell pellets after lysis according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Apoalert, BD-Clontech UK, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). Briefly, caspase 3 activity was assessed by cleavage of p-nitroaniline (pNA) from a caspase-specific substrate DEVD-pNA at 37°C for 60 minutes and expressed as nanomoles of pNA per 106 leukocytes. To confirm specificity of the observed changes, an inhibitor of caspase 3 activity (DEVD-fmk) was added to parallel samples of activated leukocytes isolated from wild-type mice injected with SES.
To modulate sIL-6R signaling in these experiments, mice were intraperitoneally administered with SES in combination with HYPER-IL-6 (40 ng per mouse) or sgp130 (150 ng per mouse), as indicated in the figure legends, before assessment of apoptosis.
Statistical comparisons. Data are expressed as means ± SEM, and statistical analysis was performed using a Student’s unpaired t test (Statview SE+Graphics [Version 1.03] software). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
IFN-γ deficiency disrupts PMN infiltration during peritoneal inflammation. We have previously observed that IFN-γ differentially controls ELR+ CXC and CC chemokine expression by HPMC (8). To establish the overall effect of IFN-γ on leukocyte recruitment, peritoneal inflammation was induced in wild-type and IFN-γ–/– mice by administration of SES (16). In wild-type mice, this resulted in a time-dependent influx of PMN into the peritoneal cavity, which peaked at 3 hours (Figure 1a). In the absence of IFN-γ, fewer infiltrating PMN were detected (Figure 1a). Indeed, the rate of PMN recruitment in IFN-γ–/– mice was impaired, and PMN numbers remained elevated for up to 12 hours after induction of inflammation (Figure 1a). Consistent with these observations, aberrant PMN recruitment in IFN-γ–/– mice was also accompanied by a defect in KC production (Figure 1b). Thus, IFN-γ might affect both the initial PMN recruitment phase and their subsequent clearance.
IFN-γ deficiency modulates the PMN infiltration in SES-induced peritoneal inflammation. (a) Wild-type and IFN-γ–/– mice were intraperitoneally administered with PBS, SES, or SES in combination with IFN-γ (50 U per mouse). At defined time points, PMN infiltration was assessed using differential cell counting (*P < 0.05, a significant increase versus IFN-γ–/– plus SES; #P < 0.05, a significant decrease versus IFN-γ–/– plus SES). (b) KC levels were quantified by ELISA (*P < 0.05, a significant increase versus IFN-γ–/– plus SES). Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 10 mice per treatment. (c) The rate of PMN infiltration in response to exogenous administration of IFN-γ (0.5–500 U per mouse) to IFN-γ–/– mice. Filled circles represent IFN-γ–/– mice receiving SES in combination with defined doses of IFN-γ. The open circle illustrates the rate of PMN infiltration in wild-type mice.
IFN-γ regulates the initial rate of PMN infiltration. Reconstitution of IFN-γ signaling in IFN-γ–/– mice facilitated a dose-dependent increase in the initial rate of PMN infiltration (Figure 1c), with 50 U of IFN-γ per mouse restoring the profile of intraperitoneal KC secretion to that observed in wild-type mice (Figure 1b). However, it is evident that other inflammatory processes must also affect PMN infiltration, since maximal PMN recruitment was not encountered until approximately 6 hours after reconstitution with 50 U of IFN-γ per mouse (Figure 1a).
IFN-γ deficiency is associated with a defect in IL-1β and IL-6 production. Administration of SES induced an early increase in intraperitoneal IL-1β production that peaked at 1 hour in wild-type mice (Figure 2a). However, this profile of IL-1β was altered in IFN-γ–/– mice and resulted in both reduced levels and a delay in the peak of IL-1β production (Figure 2a). Thus, the effect of IFN-γ on PMN recruitment may occur as a consequence of this impaired expression of IL-1β. We have established that IL-6, in combination with sIL-6R, regulates the transition between PMN and MNC infiltration in a similar manner to that elicited by IFN-γ (8, 16). To determine whether intraperitoneal IL-6 levels are influenced by IFN-γ, inflammation was provoked in both wild-type and IFN-γ–/– mice with SES. Administration of SES to wild-type mice resulted in a time-dependent increase in IL-6 generation, which peaked at 1 hour (Figure 2b). However, the profile of IL-6 production in IFN-γ–/– mice was significantly attenuated (threefold lower at 1 hour) but was almost completely restored to wild type by repletion with IFN-γ (Figure 2b), suggesting that IFN-γ locally regulates intraperitoneal IL-6 levels.
IL-1β and IL-6 production after SES-induced peritoneal inflammation in wild-type and IFN-γ–/– mice. (a) Wild-type or IFN-γ–/– mice were intraperitoneally administered with PBS or SES. At specific time intervals, mice were sacrificed, and intraperitoneal IL-1β levels were quantified using ELISA (*P < 0.05 versus PBS). (b) Wild-type or IFN-γ–/– mice were intraperitoneally administered with PBS, SES, IFN-γ (0.5 U per mouse), or a combination of SES and IFN-γ. Intraperitoneal IL-6 levels were quantified at defined time intervals (*P < 0.05 versus IFN-γ–/– plus SES alone). The lower panels show wild-type and IFN-γ–/– mice treated with PBS alone. Values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 6 mice per condition).
IFN-γ regulates the secretion of IL-6 by mesothelial cells. We have previously demonstrated that mesothelial cells are the major producers of IL-6 within the peritoneal cavity (24, 25), and its production plays a central role in regulating leukocyte recruitment (16). Exposure of HPMC to IL-1β resulted in a time- and dose-dependent increase in IL-6 production, which was synergistically enhanced by the simultaneous presence of IFN-γ (Figure 3a). Synergistic augmentation of the IL-1β response by IFN-γ was confirmed at the transcriptional level by Northern blot analysis (Figure 3b).
Regulation of IL-6 production by IL-1β and IFN-γ in vitro and in vivo. Growth-arrested HPMC were (a) incubated with medium alone or IL-1β (100 pg/ml) in the presence or absence of IFN-γ (100 U/ml). At specific time points, IL-6 levels were quantified using ELISA (*P < 0.05, a significant increase versus the additive value of IL-1β plus IFN-γ alone). (b) Northern blot analysis of total RNA isolated from HPMC incubated for 3 hours with medium and IL-1β (100 pg/ml) in the presence or absence of IFN-γ (100 U/ml). Representative results for three separate experiments are shown. (c) HPMC were stimulated with medium alone (lane 1), HYPER-IL-6 (500 pg/ml, lane 2), IFN-γ (100 U/ml, lane 3), IL-1β (100 pg/ml, lane 4), or a combination of IL-1β and IFN-γ (lane 5). At the indicated intervals, nuclear extracts were prepared and NF-κB activation was monitored by EMSA. (d) Composition of the NF-κB complex was determined by supershift using antibodies against p50 (lane 2) and p65 (lane 3). No antibodies were included in lane 1. Results are representative of three separate experiments performed with HPMC from different donors. (e) Wild-type mice were intraperitoneally administered with PBS, IL-1β (100 ng per mouse), IFN-γ (0.5 U per mouse), or a combination of IL-1β and IFN-γ at these doses. After 1 hour, mice were sacrificed and IL-6 was quantified (*P < 0.05 versus PBS alone; **P < 0.05, a significant increase versus the additive value of IL-1β plus IFN-γ alone).
To establish if the synergistic effects of IFN-γ on IL-1β–driven IL-6 production occurs at the level of their signal transduction pathways, activation of the Jak-STAT and NF-κB pathways was monitored by EMSA. STAT1 activation was maximal after 30 minutes of stimulation with IFN-γ alone and was unaffected by the presence of IL-1β (data not shown). In contrast, activation of NF-κB by IL-1β alone was maximal after 15 minutes (Figure 3c), with the intensity of the banding declining thereafter. However, in combination with IFN-γ, the IL-1β–induced activation of NF-κB was maintained over the whole time course studied (Figure 3c). Supershift analysis identified that the NF-κB complex resulted from activation of the p50 and p65 NF-κB subunits (Figure 3d).
IFN-γ regulates intraperitoneal IL-6 production in vivo. To confirm the observations presented in Figure 3 (a and b), IL-6 production by IFN-γ was monitored in vivo. Inflammation was induced in wild-type mice using IL-1β as an inflammatory stimulus (Figure 3e). Although administration of IFN-γ alone had no significant effect on intraperitoneal IL-6 secretion, coadministration with IL-1β (100 ng per mouse) resulted in a synergistic increase in intraperitoneal IL-6 levels (Figure 3e).
IFN-γ controls PMN recruitment in wild-type but not in IL-6–/– mice. In previous studies, we have demonstrated the ability of IFN-γ to downregulate IL-1β–induced ELR+ CXC chemokine production and PMN recruitment into the peritoneal cavity of wild-type mice (8). To investigate if IFN-γ downregulates PMN recruitment through an effect on IL-6 signaling, we examined the ability of IFN-γ to control PMN recruitment in wild-type and IL-6–/– mice. In wild-type mice, IL-1β–induced PMN recruitment and KC production were both significantly reduced after IFN-γ treatment (Figure 4, a and c). However, intraperitoneal administration of IFN-γ to IL-6–/– mice did not alter PMN recruitment or KC production (Figure 4, b and d).
Regulation of PMN clearance by IFN-γ is dependent on IL-6 activity. Wild-type (a and c) and IL-6–/– (b and d) mice were intraperitoneally administered with PBS, IL-1β (100 ng per mouse), IFN-γ (0.5 U per mouse), or IFN-γ in combination with IL-1β at these doses. PMN infiltration was assessed at 3 hours using differential cell counting (a and b), and intraperitoneal KC levels were quantified at 1 hour by ELISA (c and d). Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 5 mice per condition; *P < 0.05 versus PBS; **P < 0.05, a significant decrease versus IL-1β alone).
IL-6 signaling restores the control of PMN trafficking in IFN-γ deficiency. Data in IL-6–/– mice indicated that the ability of IFN-γ to control PMN recruitment is coupled to the in vivo expression of IL-6. To confirm this dependency on IL-6, inflammation was induced in IFN-γ–/– mice with either SES or IL-1β. To reconstitute IL-6 signaling, mice were administered with an engineered IL-6/sIL-6R fusion protein (HYPER-IL-6) (18) in combination with the activators of inflammation (SES or IL-1β). HYPER-IL-6 has previously been shown to suppress PMN infiltration (16) and, as predicted, significantly suppressed KC production and PMN recruitment in IFN-γ–/– mice in response to either SES- or IL-1β–induced activation (Figure 5).
Reconstitution of IL-6/sIL-6R signaling in IFN-γ–/– mice normalizes the control of PMN clearance. IFN-γ–/– mice were intraperitoneally administered with PBS, SES, IL-1β (100 pg/ml), HYPER-IL-6 (40 ng per mouse, H-IL-6), or combinations of SES with HYPER-IL-6 or IL-1β with HYPER-IL-6. PMN infiltration was assessed at 3 hours through differential cell counting (a and c), and intraperitoneal KC levels were quantified at 1 hour (b and d). Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 5 mice per condition; *P < 0.05 versus PBS; **P < 0.05, a significant decrease versus SES or IL-1β alone).
IFN-γ modulates PMN apoptosis through regulation of IL-6 activity. By a comparison of the profile of PMN infiltration in wild-type and IFN-γ–/– mice, it appears that IFN-γ directly influences the initial phase of recruitment of PMN and also indirectly acts to control their subsequent clearance (Figure 1a). Using annexin V/PI staining activity as a marker of apoptosis, we observed that PMN apoptosis after SES activation was defective in the absence of IFN-γ and remained impaired throughout the duration of the clearance phase (Table 1). Indeed, by comparing the profiles of the annexin V/PI scatter plots, it is evident that the proportion of both early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptotic/necrotic (upper right quadrant) PMN was significantly impaired in both IFN-γ–/– and IL-6–/– mice (Figure 6). Defective PMN apoptosis in IFN-γ–/– and IL-6–/– mice was also confirmed by measurement of leukocyte caspase 3 activity after induction of SES-induced inflammation. As shown in Figure 7b, caspase 3 activity was significantly reduced in both IFN-γ–/– and IL-6–/– mice as compared with wild-type mice.
IFN-γ and IL-6 modulate leukocyte apoptosis during SES-induced peritoneal inflammation. Annexin V/PI staining of leukocytes isolated from the peritoneal cavity of wild-type, IFN-γ–/–, and IL-6–/– mice. Representative scatter plots show FACS analysis of gated PMN obtained from mice stimulated with SES for 6 hours. Apoptotic cells were identified according to annexin V+/PI– (lower right quadrant, early apoptosis) and annexin V+/PI+ (upper right quadrant, late apoptosis/necrosis) staining. The proportion of cells residing in each quadrant is expressed as a percentage (mean ± SEM, n = 4–7 mice/condition; *P < 0.05, a significant increase versus IFN-γ–/– plus SES). By comparison with values from wild-type mice, mean reductions of 40.2% and 55.4% were respectively seen in early and late apoptotic events for IFN-γ–/– mice and of 66.2% and 48.9% for IL-6–/– mice. The proportion of annexin V+/PI– PMN in mouse peripheral blood was always less than 1% (data not shown).
Modulation of IL-6 signaling in vivo affects apoptotic clearance of PMN in SES-induced peritoneal inflammation. (a) Annexin V/PI staining of leukocytes. Representative scatter plots show similar analysis performed on cells elicited from wild-type mice after 6 hours of stimulation with SES in combination with sgp130 (150 ng per mouse) or IFN-γ–/– mice after stimulation with SES in combination with HYPER-IL-6 (40 ng per mouse). (b) Caspase 3 activity was evaluated in isolated leukocytes from wild-type, IFN-γ–/–, and IL-6–/– mice intraperitoneally administered with SES, IFN-γ–/– mice administered with SES in combination with HYPER-IL-6 (40 ng per mouse), or wild-type mice administered with SES in combination with sgp130 (150 ng per mouse). Data (expressed as nanomoles of pNA per 106 cells) is presented from the 6-hour time point (mean ± SEM, n = 5 mice per condition; *P < 0.05, a significant decrease versus wild type plus SES; **P < 0.05, a significant decrease versus IFN-γ–/– plus SES). Inclusion of the caspase 3 inhibitor DEVD-fmk to wild-type leukocyte extracts reduced activity to background levels (data not shown). (c) Wild-type mice were intraperitoneally administered SES, SES plus sgp130 (150 ng per mouse), or PBS, and IL-6–/– mice were intraperitoneally administered SES or PBS. At defined intervals, PMN infiltration was assessed by differential cell count. The lower panel shows PMN influx in response to PBS alone. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 12 mice per treatment (*P < 0.05 versus wild-type mice).
To establish a potential link between IFN-γ and IL-6 in controlling PMN apoptosis, IL-6/sIL-6R signaling was modulated in wild-type and IFN-γ–/– mice (Figure 7, a and b). Blockade of sIL-6R signaling in wild-type mice using sgp130 (26) significantly reduced the proportion of early apoptosis as assessed by annexin V staining (lower right quadrant) but had no apparent effect on late apoptotic/necrotic PMN (Figure 7a). Under identical conditions, however, administration of sgp130 to wild-type mice significantly reduced caspase 3 activation, confirming that there was indeed a defect in apoptosis under conditions of IL-6/sIL-6R signaling deficiency (Figure 7b). Conversely, administration of HYPER-IL-6 to IFN-γ–/– mice restored leukocyte apoptosis to levels comparable with those seen in wild-type mice (Figure 7b). Thus, IFN-γ modulates PMN apoptosis through an effect on sIL-6R–induced signaling within the peritoneal cavity. Consistent with the notion that sIL-6R signaling is pivotal in the controlled removal of neutrophils during acute inflammation is the observation that IL-6–/– mice demonstrate aberrant clearance of PMN from the peritoneal cavity after SES-induced inflammation (Figure 7c) and that inhibition of sIL-6R signaling in wild-type mice, with sgp130, results in a profile of PMN recruitment consistent with that seen in IL-6–/– mice (Figure 7c). These IL-6/sIL-6R–driven effects appear to be related to the control of neutrophil clearance, since the initial rate of PMN influx remained unaffected by sgp130 blockade.
IFN-γ plays a central role in governing immune cell responses and T cell polarization. However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that this cytokine also orchestrates innate immune responses (2, 4). Although data suggest that these effects are related to induction of genes associated with innate cellular immunity, the precise mechanisms by which this cytokine contributes to host defense and the resolution of inflammation remain to be fully identified (1). To ensure that the inflammatory response provides an efficient mechanism for eradicating bacterial infection without damaging host tissues, leukocyte recruitment, activation, and clearance is tightly regulated (17). Previously, we have established that IFN-γ can modulate chemokine production and leukocyte recruitment in response to proinflammatory cytokines (8). Coordination of these processes is highly reminiscent of the inflammatory events controlled by IL-6 and its soluble receptor, sIL-6R (16). In light of the congruence between the activities of IFN-γ and IL-6, we have now explored the potential interplay between these inflammatory cytokines in regulating leukocyte trafficking.
Initial experiments examined the effect of IFN-γ deficiency on the process of PMN recruitment. Induction of inflammation in IFN-γ–/– mice with SES resulted in modulation of the PMN recruitment profile, defined by a delay in the rate of initial accumulation, aberrant clearance, and a reduction in overall PMN numbers. Repletion experiments (with murine IFN-γ) resulted in partial restoration of recruitment of PMN, with the most striking effect being in controlling the initial rate of their recruitment into the peritoneal cavity. IFN-γ thus appears to directly influence the effector arm of PMN recruitment as a result of its ability to regulate the local concentrations of ELR+ chemokines (KC/macrophage inflammatory peptide–2). This response to IFN-γ would seem to be independent of IL-6, since the initial rate of PMN infiltration is unaffected by IL-6 or blockade of sIL-6R signaling with sgp130, and IL-6 deficiency is associated with greater PMN infiltration, increased KC/macrophage inflammatory peptide–2 expression, and a delay in neutrophil clearance (Figure 7c) (16, 27).
The mechanism by which IFN-γ controls initial PMN recruitment is at least in part related to the early secretion of IL-1β in response to SES, since its production is reduced after induction of inflammation in IFN-γ–/– mice. Consequently, combined IFN-γ and IL-1β signaling appear to play a pivotal role in controlling the initial rate of PMN recruitment through their regulation of ELR+ CXC chemokine expression. In this respect, we have previously observed that IFN-γ dose-dependently modulates IL-1β– or TNF-α–driven CXCL8 (IL-8) production (8). In the context of the peritoneal cavity, the mesothelium performs a major role in host defense against bacterial infection, and as in other organ systems, local chemokine secretion plays a pivotal role in controlling these processes (28, 29). Such concentration-dependent effects of IFN-γ are relevant to bacterial peritonitis, in which temporal changes in intraperitoneal IL-1, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels are observed during the progression of inflammation (12).
We have previously identified that both IFN-γ and IL-6 signaling through sIL-6R contribute to the process of PMN removal from the peritoneal cavity and a shift from innate to acquired immunity (16). The data presented herein emphasize that a deficiency in IFN-γ is accompanied by a defect in IL-6 expression and PMN removal from the peritoneal cavity. Reconstitution of IFN-γ signaling in IFN-γ–/– mice restored IL-6 secretion and identifies a direct role for IFN-γ in controlling local IL-6 generation. Indeed, by modulating the activities of IL-6 (through its soluble receptor) and IFN-γ in IL-6- and IFN-γ–deficient mice, we have clearly shown that IFN-γ promotes the clearance of PMN by regulating local IL-6 levels. In vitro studies emphasize that IFN-γ and IL-1β synergistically induce the expression of IL-6, paralleling studies in human monocytes (30). This interplay of IL-1β and IFN-γ signaling appears to result in the maintenance of NF-κB activity (Figure 3c) (31, 32).
The apparent defect in PMN clearance in IFN-γ–/– mice challenged with SES led us to examine the mechanisms controlling the apoptosis of senescent PMN. Using both annexin V/PI staining and caspase 3 activation to characterize both early and late apoptotic events (33), we identified significantly reduced levels of apoptosis in both IFN-γ and IL-6 deficiency. Reconstitution of IL-6/sIL-6R signaling in IFN-γ–/– and IL-6–/– mice restored apoptosis, which emphasizes that IL-6 signaling through its soluble receptor promotes PMN apoptosis. This conclusion is directly supported by the studies presented using sgp130 as the natural sIL-6R antagonist (26). Administration of sgp130 to wild-type mice significantly blocked the in vivo activation of caspase 3 and reduced the proportion of PMN entering early apoptosis. Although in these experiments no significant difference was observed in the proportion of late apoptotic/necrotic PMN, as assessed by annexin V+/PI+ cells, this is perhaps not surprising given that sgp130 augments PMN recruitment and residence time, while concomitantly blocking MNC infiltration (Figure 7c) (16). Such a disproportionate skewing of the leukocyte influx may ultimately impinge on the nonphlogistic removal of PMN by infiltrating MNC and result in a higher proportion of late apoptotic and necrotic cells being retained at the inflammatory focus. Although the precise cellular mechanisms governing these effects on apoptosis are yet to be defined, previous studies have identified that IFN-γ can modulate apoptotic pathways through cathepsin D– or Fas-related pathways (34–36), whereas IL-6 can rescue T cells from apoptosis through induction of bcl-2 and bcl-xl (37). Indeed, both IL-6 and STAT1/3 signaling have been implicated in protection against Fas-mediated cell death through modulating cell-surface Fas and antiapoptotic gene expression in T lymphocytes (38–40).
These observations on the role of sIL-6R in promoting PMN apoptosis during acute inflammation contrast with its ability to promote lymphocyte survival in chronic inflammatory conditions such as Crohn’s disease (41). Interestingly, under these conditions elevated IL-6 levels are paralleled by increases in IFN-γ, suggestive of potential interactions between these signaling pathways in controlling T cell apoptosis (39, 41), an observation recently substantiated in a model of T cell–mediated experimental hepatitis in IFN-γ–/– and IL-6–/– mice (42). The ability of IL-6 (and IFN-γ) signaling to balance pro- and antiapoptotic events in distinct leukocyte populations may be crucial to the transition between innate and acquired immunity. Indeed, such differential regulation of pro- and antiapoptotic signals may promote the nonphlogistic phagocytosis of senescent PMN, while protecting MNC (responsible for their removal) from entering apoptosis. Ultimately, these events appear to be essential in the controlled removal of PMN and the resolution of acute inflammation (43–45).
Although the controlled recruitment and removal of leukocytes is pivotal to effective host defense and the resolution of inflammation, their maintenance at sites of injury or infection contributes directly to disease pathogenesis (46). The current data suggest that interplay between IFN-γ and IL-6/sIL-6R signaling contributes to the rapid recruitment and timely removal of PMN from sites of acute inflammation. In the context of host defense, these data provide a rationale at the level of leukocyte trafficking for the obligate role of IFN-γ in controlling bacterial and viral infection and resolution of acute inflammation (1, 2, 4). In more chronic conditions such as hepatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and arthritis, however, characterized by activated T cell infiltration, the balance of STAT1 and STAT3 signaling (presumably controlled by local IL-6 and IFN-γ levels) contributes directly to disease progression (41, 42, 47). Taken together, these data emphasize that irrespective of disease context, the regulated or deregulated interplay between the effects of IL-6 and IFN-γ are central to the control of leukocyte trafficking in inflammatory disease. Consequently, understanding the contribution of IFN-γ and IL-6/sIL-6R signaling to leukocyte trafficking in both acute and chronic inflammatory states is essential if appropriate therapeutic strategies aimed at more effective host defense, or reducing the detrimental consequences of unresolved chronic inflammation, are to be achieved.
We are grateful to Patti Coan (Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham) for help and advice on the establishment of our mouse colonies. This work was supported by a Medical Research Council (MRC) Ph.D. studentship (to R.M. McLoughlin); a University of Wales College of Medicine, Division of Medicine Ph.D. studentship (to T.S. Wilkinson); and project grants from the Wellcome Trust (058297/2/99/Z and 065961/Z/01/Z to S.A. Jones and N. Topley) and the Arthritis Research Campaign (J0527 and J0538 to S.A. Jones, N. Topley, and A.S. Williams).
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: signal transducer and activator of transcription factor 1 (STAT1); neutrophils (PMN); soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R); mononuclear cells (MNC); soluble gp130 (sgp130); human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC); digoxigenin (DIG); electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA); S. epidermidis cell-free supernatant (SES); propidium iodide (PI); p-nitroaniline (pNA).