Ischemic stroke is a major cause of disability in adults. Early treatment with thrombolytics and/or thrombectomy can significantly improve outcomes; however, following these acute interventions, treatment is limited to rehabilitation therapies. Thus, identification of therapeutic strategies that can help restore brain function in the post-acute phase remains a major challenge. Here we report that genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of the PDGF-CC/PDGFRα pathway, which has previously been implicated in stroke pathology, significantly reduced myofibroblast expansion in the border of the fibrotic scar and improved outcome in a sensory-motor integration test after experimental ischemic stroke. This was supported by gene expression analyses of cerebrovascular fragments showing upregulation of profibrotic/proinflammatory genes, including genes of the TGF pathway, after ischemic stroke or intracerebroventricular injection of active PDGF-CC. Further, longitudinal intravital 2-photon imaging revealed that inhibition of PDGFRα dampened the biphasic pattern of stroke-induced vascular leakage and enhanced vascular perfusion in the ischemic lesion. Importantly, we found PDGFRα inhibition to be effective in enhancing functional recovery when initiated 24 hours after ischemic stroke. Our data implicate the PDGF-CC/PDGFRα pathway as a crucial mediator modulating post-stroke pathology and suggest a post-acute treatment opportunity for patients with ischemic stroke targeting myofibroblast expansion to foster long-term CNS repair.
Jil Protzmann, Manuel Zeitelhofer, Christina Stefanitsch, Daniel Torrente, Milena Z. Adzemovic, Kirils Matjunins, Stella J.I. Randel, Sebastian A. Lewandowski, Lars Muhl, Ulf Eriksson, Ingrid Nilsson, Enming J. Su, Daniel A. Lawrence, Linda Fredriksson
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,894 | 0 |
882 | 0 | |
Figure | 157 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 704 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 20 | 0 |
Totals | 3,657 | 0 |
Total Views | 3,657 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.