Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Patient-tailored adoptive immunotherapy with EBV-specific T cells from related and unrelated donors
Agnes Bonifacius, … , Britta Eiz-Vesper, Britta Maecker-Kolhoff
Agnes Bonifacius, … , Britta Eiz-Vesper, Britta Maecker-Kolhoff
Published May 9, 2023
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(12):e163548. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI163548.
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Article has an altmetric score of 23

Patient-tailored adoptive immunotherapy with EBV-specific T cells from related and unrelated donors

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Adoptive transfer of EBV-specific T cells can restore specific immunity in immunocompromised patients with EBV-associated complications.METHODS We provide results of a personalized T cell manufacturing program evaluating donor, patient, T cell product, and outcome data. Patient-tailored clinical-grade EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (EBV-CTL) products from stem cell donors (SCDs), related third-party donors (TPDs), or unrelated TPDs from the allogeneic T cell donor registry (alloCELL) at Hannover Medical School were manufactured by immunomagnetic selection using a CliniMACS Plus or Prodigy device and the EBV PepTivators EBNA-1 and Select. Consecutive manufacturing processes were evaluated, and patient outcome and side effects were retrieved by retrospective chart analysis.RESULTS Forty clinical-grade EBV-CTL products from SCDs, related TPDs, or unrelated TPDs were generated for 37 patients with refractory EBV infections or EBV-associated malignancies with and without a history of transplantation, within 5 days (median) after donor identification. Thirty-four patients received 1–14 EBV-CTL products (fresh and cryopreserved). EBV-CTL transfer led to a complete response in 20 of 29 patients who were evaluated for clinical response. No infusion-related toxicity was reported. EBV-specific T cells in patients’ blood were detectable in 16 of 18 monitored patients (89%) after transfer, and their presence correlated with clinical response.CONCLUSION Personalized clinical-grade manufacture of EBV-CTL products via immunomagnetic selection from SCDs, related TPDs, or unrelated TPDs in a timely manner is feasible. Overall, EBV-CTLs were clinically effective and well tolerated. Our data suggest EBV-CTL transfer as a promising therapeutic approach for immunocompromised patients with refractory EBV-associated diseases beyond HSCT, as well as patients with preexisting organ dysfunction.TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.FUNDING This study was funded in part by the German Research Foundation (DFG, 158989968/SFB 900), the Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung (DKS 2013.09), Wilhelm-Sander-Stiftung (reference 2015.097.1), Ellen-Schmidt-Program of Hannover Medical School, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (reference 01EO0802).

Authors

Agnes Bonifacius, Britta Lamottke, Sabine Tischer-Zimmermann, Rebecca Schultze-Florey, Lilia Goudeva, Hans-Gert Heuft, Lubomir Arseniev, Rita Beier, Gernot Beutel, Gunnar Cario, Birgit Fröhlich, Johann Greil, Leo Hansmann, Justin Hasenkamp, Michaela Höfs, Patrick Hundsdoerfer, Edgar Jost, Kinan Kafa, Oliver Kriege, Nicolaus Kröger, Stephan Mathas, Roland Meisel, Michaela Nathrath, Mervi Putkonen, Sarina Ravens, Hans Christian Reinhardt, Elisa Sala, Martin G. Sauer, Clemens Schmitt, Roland Schroers, Nina Kristin Steckel, Ralf Ulrich Trappe, Mareike Verbeek, Daniel Wolff, Rainer Blasczyk, Britta Eiz-Vesper, Britta Maecker-Kolhoff

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,291 369
PDF 252 124
Figure 274 5
Table 292 0
Supplemental data 130 8
Citation downloads 69 0
Totals 2,308 506
Total Views 2,814

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Picked up by 2 news outlets
Posted by 13 X users
29 readers on Mendeley
See more details