Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(2):e163447. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI163447.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized modern cancer therapy, arousing great interest in the neuro-oncology community. While several reports show that subsets of patients with glioma exhibit durable responses to immunotherapy, the efficacy of this treatment has not been observed for unselected patient populations, preventing its broad clinical implementation for gliomas and glioblastoma (GBM). To exploit the maximum therapeutic potential of ICB for patients with glioma, understanding the different aspects of glioma-related tumor immune responses is of critical importance. In this Review, we discuss contributing factors that distinguish subsets of patients with glioma who may benefit from ICB. Specifically, we discuss (a) the complex interaction between the tumor immune microenvironment and glioma cells as a potential influence on immunotherapy responses; (b) promising biomarkers for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors; and (c) the potential contributions of peripheral immune cells to therapeutic responses.
Authors
Víctor A. Arrieta, Crismita Dmello, Daniel J. McGrail, Daniel J. Brat, Catalina Lee-Chang, Amy B. Heimberger, Dhan Chand, Roger Stupp, Adam M. Sonabend
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 7,348 | 1,447 |
| 971 | 321 | |
| Figure | 892 | 1 |
| Citation downloads | 249 | 0 |
| Totals | 9,460 | 1,769 |
| Total Views | 11,229 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)