Advertisement
Letter to the EditorHematologyImmunology
Open Access | 10.1172/JCI161979
1Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
2Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Find articles by Takata, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
2Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Find articles by
Steidl, C.
in:
JCI
|
PubMed
|
Google Scholar
|
Published July 15, 2022 - More info
PRAME is a prominent member of the cancer testis antigen family of proteins, which triggers autologous T cell–mediated immune responses. Integrative genomic analysis in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) uncovered recurrent and highly focal deletions of 22q11.22, including the PRAME gene, which were associated with poor outcome. PRAME-deleted tumors showed cytotoxic T cell immune escape and were associated with cold tumor microenvironments. In addition, PRAME downmodulation was strongly associated with somatic EZH2 Y641 mutations in DLBCL. In turn, PRC2-regulated genes were repressed in isogenic PRAME-KO lymphoma cell lines, and PRAME was found to directly interact with EZH2 as a negative regulator. EZH2 inhibition with EPZ-6438 abrogated these extrinsic and intrinsic effects, leading to PRAME expression and microenvironment restoration in vivo. Our data highlight multiple functions of PRAME during lymphomagenesis and provide a preclinical rationale for synergistic therapies combining epigenetic reprogramming with PRAME-targeted therapies.
Katsuyoshi Takata, Lauren C. Chong, Daisuke Ennishi, Tomohiro Aoki, Michael Yu Li, Avinash Thakur, Shannon Healy, Elena Viganò, Tao Dao, Daniel Kwon, Gerben Duns, Julie S. Nielsen, Susana Ben-Neriah, Ethan Tse, Stacy S. Hung, Merrill Boyle, Sung Soo Mun, Christopher M. Bourne, Bruce Woolcock, Adèle Telenius, Makoto Kishida, Shinya Rai, Allen W. Zhang, Ali Bashashati, Saeed Saberi, Gianluca D’Antonio, Brad H. Nelson, Sohrab P. Shah, Pamela A. Hoodless, Ari M. Melnick, Randy D. Gascoyne, Joseph M. Connors, David A. Scheinberg, Wendy Béguelin, David W. Scott, Christian Steidl
We thank Dr. Mraz for insightful comments that provide additional context to the findings in our study, in particular bringing to the forefront studies in other B cell malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (1). As pointed out in the Letter by Dr. Mraz and discussed in our manuscript, PRAME deletions were significantly associated with Ig-λ rearrangements, and this finding is consistent with a mechanism in which PRAME deletions can occur in the context of rearrangement of variable (V) gene loci on chromosome 22 in a subset of patients (2). For this reason, we studied frequencies and treatment outcomes for PRAME deletions in the context of Ig-λ expression, as shown in Figure 1 (2). In particular, we demonstrate that PRAME deletions are independently associated with outcomes in multivariable analysis, making it unlikely that PRAME deletions are a pure surrogate for the prognostic effects of Ig-λ usage. As described by Mraz and Pospisilova, the association of PRAME deletion and Ig-λ rearrangement and expression is not absolute, and PRAME deletion is likely dependent on the exact V segment usage (3). Consistently, we did not observe PRAME deletions in the majority of patients expressing Ig-λ, and, interestingly, a minority of patients with PRAME deletions expressed Ig-κ. Indeed, it remains an open question whether heterozygous or homozygous PRAME deletions can occur during the process of B cell lymphomagenesis, and potentially at the time point of the germinal center (GC) reaction in GC-derived diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs). Regardless of the deletion-generating mechanism, our study brings into focus PRAME loss–associated cell-autonomous and tumor microenvironment phenotypes that are under selective pressure in DLBCL. Our discovery that both genomic PRAME deletion and EZH2 mutations converge on reduced PRAME expression and downstream phenotypes underscores the pathogenic relevance of the PRAME gene in B cell lymphoma.
Conflict of interest: CS has performed consultancy for Seattle Genetics, Curis Inc., Roche, AbbVie, Juno Therapeutics, and Bayer and has received research support from Epizyme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Trillium Therapeutics Inc.
Address correspondence to: Christian Steidl, British Columbia Cancer, 675 West 10th Ave., Room 12-110, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1L3, Canada. Email: CSteidl@bccancer.bc.ca.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2022;132(14):e161979. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI161979.
See the related article at Tumor-associated antigen PRAME exhibits dualistic functions that are targetable in diffuse large B cell lymphoma .
See the related Letter to the Editor at Genetic mechanism for the loss of PRAME in B cell lymphomas.