Advertisement
Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI16112
1Department of Medicine, and Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA2 Laboratorio di Genetica Molecolare, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
Address correspondence to: Alan S. Verkman, 1246 Health Sciences East Tower, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0521, USA. Phone: (415) 476-8530; Fax: (415) 665-3847; E-mail: verkman@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Find articles by Ma, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, and Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA2 Laboratorio di Genetica Molecolare, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
Address correspondence to: Alan S. Verkman, 1246 Health Sciences East Tower, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0521, USA. Phone: (415) 476-8530; Fax: (415) 665-3847; E-mail: verkman@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Find articles by Thiagarajah, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, and Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA2 Laboratorio di Genetica Molecolare, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
Address correspondence to: Alan S. Verkman, 1246 Health Sciences East Tower, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0521, USA. Phone: (415) 476-8530; Fax: (415) 665-3847; E-mail: verkman@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Find articles by Yang, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, and Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA2 Laboratorio di Genetica Molecolare, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
Address correspondence to: Alan S. Verkman, 1246 Health Sciences East Tower, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0521, USA. Phone: (415) 476-8530; Fax: (415) 665-3847; E-mail: verkman@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Find articles by Sonawane, N. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, and Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA2 Laboratorio di Genetica Molecolare, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
Address correspondence to: Alan S. Verkman, 1246 Health Sciences East Tower, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0521, USA. Phone: (415) 476-8530; Fax: (415) 665-3847; E-mail: verkman@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Find articles by Folli, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, and Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA2 Laboratorio di Genetica Molecolare, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
Address correspondence to: Alan S. Verkman, 1246 Health Sciences East Tower, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0521, USA. Phone: (415) 476-8530; Fax: (415) 665-3847; E-mail: verkman@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Find articles by Galietta, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, and Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA2 Laboratorio di Genetica Molecolare, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
Address correspondence to: Alan S. Verkman, 1246 Health Sciences East Tower, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0521, USA. Phone: (415) 476-8530; Fax: (415) 665-3847; E-mail: verkman@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Find articles by Verkman, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published December 1, 2002 - More info
Secretory diarrhea is the leading cause of infant death in developing countries and a major cause of morbidity in adults. The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein is required for fluid secretion in the intestine and airways and, when defective, causes the lethal genetic disease cystic fibrosis. We screened 50,000 chemically diverse compounds for inhibition of cAMP/flavone–stimulated Cl– transport in epithelial cells expressing CFTR. Six CFTR inhibitors of the 2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone chemical class were identified. The most potent compound discovered by screening of structural analogs, CFTRinh-172, reversibly inhibited CFTR short-circuit current in less than 2 minutes in a voltage-independent manner with KI approximately 300 nM. CFTRinh-172 was nontoxic at high concentrations in cell culture and mouse models. At concentrations fully inhibiting CFTR, CFTRinh-172 did not prevent elevation of cellular cAMP or inhibit non-CFTR Cl– channels, multidrug resistance protein-1 (MDR-1), ATP-sensitive K+ channels, or a series of other transporters. A single intraperitoneal injection of CFTRinh-172 (250 μg/kg) in mice reduced by more than 90% cholera toxin–induced fluid secretion in the small intestine over 6 hours. Thiazolidinone CFTR inhibitors may be useful in developing large-animal models of cystic fibrosis and in reducing intestinal fluid loss in cholera and other secretory diarrheas.
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein is a cAMP-activated Cl– channel expressed in epithelial cells in mammalian airways, intestine, pancreas, and testis. The hereditary lethal disease cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by mutations in CFTR. Observations in human CF patients and CF mouse models indicate the functional importance of CFTR in intestinal and pancreatic fluid transport, as well as in male fertility (1, 2). However, the mechanisms remain unclear by which defective CFTR produces airway disease, which is the principal cause of morbidity and mortality in CF (3). Major difficulties in understanding airway disease in CF include the inadequacy of CF mouse models, which manifest little or no airway disease, the lack of large-animal models of CF, and the limited availability of human CF airways that have not been damaged by chronic infection and inflammation. High-affinity, CFTR-selective inhibitors have not been available to study airway disease mechanisms in CF or to create the CF phenotype in large-animal models.
In addition to pharmacological creation of the CF phenotype, high-affinity CFTR inhibitors have potential clinical applications in the therapy of secretory diarrheas and cystic kidney disease, and in inhibiting male fertility. The compounds diphenylamine-2-carboxylate (DPC) and 5-nitro-2(3-phenylpropyl-amino)benzoate (NPPB) inhibit CFTR at high concentrations but are nonspecific in their inhibitory action (4–6). The best CFTR inhibitor available for electrophysiological and other cell-based studies, glibenclamide, is generally used at concentrations of greater than 100 μM (7, 8), at which it also inhibits other Cl– transporters as well as K+ channels (9–11). We postulated that small-molecule, high-affinity CFTR inhibitors may exist, based on the availability of potent inhibitors for some other ion transporters, as well as the demonstrated sensitivity of CFTR Cl– conductance to small sequence changes in mutagenesis experiments.
The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize inhibitors of CFTR Cl– channel function. Because of the limited information about CFTR structure and the inadequacy of available inhibitors as lead compounds, we screened a collection of diverse druglike compounds using a cell-based fluorescence assay developed in our laboratory (12–15). The high-throughput screening assay was designed to identify CFTR inhibitors that interact directly with CFTR. Several small-molecule CFTR inhibitors were identified that belonged to a novel chemical class. The best inhibitor identified by screening of structural analogs was subject to electrophysiological, mechanistic, and toxicological analyses and was shown to have efficacy in a mouse model of cholera toxin–induced secretory diarrhea.
Cell lines, mice, and compounds. Fischer rat thyroid (FRT) cells coexpressing human wild-type CFTR and the halide indicator YFP-H148Q were generated as described previously (14). Cells were plated in 96-well black-walled microplates (Corning-Costar Corp., Corning, New York, USA) at a density of 20,000 cells per well in Coon’s modified F12 medium supplemented with 5% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Assays were done at 48 hours after plating, at which time cells were just confluent (∼40,000 cells per well). Initial screening was done using a diverse collection of 50,000 druglike compounds from ChemBridge Research Laboratories (San Diego, California, USA), obtained as 10-mM stock solutions in DMSO and diluted to 1 mM in 96-well microplates. Structure-activity analysis was done on analogs purchased from ChemBridge Research Laboratories and ChemDiv (San Diego, California, USA). Wild-type and CF (ΔF508 homozygous mutant) mice were bred by the CF Animal Core facility at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). Animal protocols were approved by the UCSF Committee on Animal Research.
Synthesis of 2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone analogs. Synthesis of CFTRinh-172 (see Figure 1c) and analogs with different positions of the trifluoromethyl and carboxy substituents was accomplished by Knoevenagel condensation of 2-thioxo-3-[a-trifluoromethylphenyl]-4-thiazolidinone (a = 2, 3, or 4) with b-carboxybenzaldehyde (b = 2, 3, or 4) in the presence of piperidine. Precipitates were filtered, washed with ethanol, dried, and recrystallized two to three times from ethanol to give bright yellow crystals (70–85% yields). Structures were confirmed by 1H-NMR. Purity was greater than 99% as judged by TLC and HPLC.
Identification of CFTR inhibitors by high-throughput screening. (a) Schematic of screening approach. CFTR was maximally stimulated by multiple agonists in stably transfected epithelial cells coexpressing human CFTR and a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) with fluorescence sensitive to Cl–/I–. After addition of test compound, I– influx was induced by adding an I–-containing solution. (b) Representative original fluorescence data from individual wells showing controls (no activators, no test compound) and test wells. (c) Top: Chemical structure of 2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone CFTR inhibitors. Bottom: Structures of analogs having greatest CFTR inhibitory activity. Relative potencies were 0.2 (CFTRinh-020), 0.3 (CFTRinh-029), 1.0 (CFTRinh-172), 0.2 (CFTRinh-185), 0.1 (CFTRinh-214), and 0.1 (CFTRinh-236).
Screening procedures. Assays were done using a customized screening system (Beckman Coulter Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) consisting of a 3-meter robotic arm, CO2 incubator, plate washer, liquid-handling workstation, bar code reader, delidding station, and two FLUOstar fluorescence platereaders (BMG Labtechnologies, Durham, North Carolina, USA), each equipped with two syringe pumps and HQ500/20X (500 ± 10 nm) excitation and HQ535/30M (535 ± 15 nm) emission filters (Chroma, Brattleboro, Vermont, USA) (details in ref. 15). The robotic system was integrated using SAMI version 3.3 software (Beckman Coulter Inc.) modified for two platereaders. Custom software was written in Microsoft VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) to compute base-line–subtracted, normalized fluorescence slopes (giving halide influx rates) from stored data files.
We set up the assay by loading the incubator (37°C, 90% humidity, 5% CO2) with 40–60 96-well plates containing the FRT cells, and loading a carousel with 96-well plates containing test compounds and disposable plastic pipette tips. To initiate the assay, each well of a 96-well plate was washed three times in PBS (300 μl/wash), leaving 50 μl PBS. Ten microliters of a CFTR-activating cocktail (5 μM forskolin, 100 μM IBMX [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA], 25 μM apigenin in PBS) was added, and after 5 minutes one test compound (0.5 μl of 1 mM DMSO solution) was added to each well to give 10 μM final concentration. After 10 minutes, 96-well plates were transferred to a platereader for fluorescence assay. We assayed each well individually for CFTR-mediated I– transport by recording fluorescence continuously (200 ms per point) for 2 seconds (base line) and then for 12 seconds after rapid (<0.5 seconds) addition of 165 μl of isosmolar PBS in which 137 mM Cl– was replaced by I–.
Assays of intracellular [cAMP], phosphatase, and toxicity. [cAMP] and phosphatase assays were done as reported previously (14). Cell toxicity was assayed by the dihydrorhodamine method at 24 hours after cell incubation with 0–1,000 μM inhibitor. Animal toxicity was assessed by measurement of serum chemistries and hematology (UCSF Clinical Laboratory) in mice at 5 days after daily intraperitoneal injections with 0–1,000 μg/kg inhibitor.
MDR-1 activity. We evaluated multidrug resistance protein-1 (MDR-1) activity by measuring 3H-vincristine accumulation in an immortalized human tracheal cell line, 9HTEo-/Dx, in which the endogenous expression of MDR-1 was upregulated by selection in increasing concentrations of doxorubicin (16). Cells were seeded in 24-well microplates (200,000 cells per well). After 48 hours, cells were washed with a solution containing (in mM) 130 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1 KH2PO4, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 Na-HEPES (pH 7.3), and 10 glucose, and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with 200 μl of the same solution containing 3H-vincristine (0.7 μM; 1 μCi/ml). Cells were then washed three times with ice-cold solution and lysed in 0.25 M NaOH. Vincristine content was determined by scintillation counting.
Short-circuit current. Snapwell inserts containing CFTR-expressing FRT cells or human bronchial epithelial cells were mounted in an Ussing chamber system. For FRT cells, the hemichambers were filled with 5 ml of 75 mM NaCl and 75 mM Na gluconate (apical) and 150 mM NaCl (basolateral) (pH 7.3), and the basolateral membrane was permeabilized with 250 μg/ml amphotericin B (14, 15). For bronchial epithelial cells and T84 cells, both hemichambers contained a Krebs bicarbonate solution (15). Hemichambers were continuously bubbled with air (FRT cells) or 5% CO2 in air (bronchial and T84 cells) and maintained at 37°C. Short-circuit current was recorded continuously using a DVC-1000 voltage clamp (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, Florida, USA) with Ag/AgCl electrodes and 1 M KCl agar bridges.
Patch-clamp analysis of Cl– channel activity. Membrane current was measured in a whole-cell configuration. For recordings of Cl– channels, the extracellular (bath) solution contained (in mM) 150 NaCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 glucose, 10 mannitol, and 10 TES (pH 7.4), and the intracellular (pipette) solution contained 120 CsCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 TEA-Cl, 0.5 EGTA, 1 Mg-ATP, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.3). CFTR was activated by forskolin (5 μM) in the extracellular solution. The time course of membrane conductance was monitored in response to alternating voltage pulses of –100 and +80 mV. At defined times the protocol was interrupted to generate current-voltage relationships (voltage pulses from –100 to +100 mV in 20-mV increments). Volume-sensitive Cl– channels were activated by a hypotonic solution (extracellular NaCl decreased to 120 mM NaCl; 250 mosM/kg). Calcium-sensitive Cl– channels were activated in human bronchial epithelial cells by addition of 100 μM UTP to the extracellular solution.
Patch-clamp analysis of ATP-sensitive K+ channels. Membrane potential was recorded in the pancreatic β cell line INS-1, in which the extracellular (bath) solution contained (in mM): 130 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1 KH2PO4, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 Na-HEPES (pH 7.3), and 10 glucose. The pipette contained (in mM): 140 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 0.5 Mg-ATP, and 10 K-HEPES (pH 7.3). After the whole-cell configuration was achieved, the amplifier was switched to current-clamp mode.
Intestinal fluid secretion and short-circuit current. In the first of three assays, fluid accumulation in ileal loops was measured (17, 18). Mice (age 8–10 weeks, body weight 25–35 g) in a CD1 genetic background (or ΔF508 homozygous mice) were starved for 24 hours and anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine (40 mg/kg) and xylazine (8 mg/kg). Body temperature was maintained during surgery at 36–38°C using a heating pad. A small abdominal incision was made to expose the small intestine, and closed ileal loops (length 20–30 mm) proximal to the cecum were isolated by sutures. Loops were injected with 100 μl of PBS alone or PBS containing cholera toxin (1 μg). In some experiments the inhibitor (150 μg/kg) was administered by intraperitoneal injection. The abdominal incision was closed with suture, and mice were allowed to recover from anesthesia. At 6 hours the mice were anesthetized, intestinal loops were exteriorized, and loop length and weight were measured after removal of mesentery and connective tissue.
In the sealed adult mouse model of secretory diarrhea, mice were gavaged with cholera toxin (10 μg) in 0.1 ml of 7% bicarbonate buffer (or buffer alone) using a orogastric feeding needle (19, 20). The four experimental groups were control (buffer alone), cholera-treated, treated with cholera plus inhibitor (250 μg/kg intraperitoneally 2 minutes before gavage), and treated with inhibitor alone. After 6 hours, mice were euthanized and the small intestine (from pylorus to cecum) was exteriorized and stripped of associated mesenteric and connective tissues. The intestine was weighed, then opened longitudinally to remove lumenal fluid (by blotting) and weighed again. Fluid accumulation was computed from the ratio of intestinal weight before to intestinal weight after lumenal fluid removal. For measurement of short-circuit current, strips of rat colon were isolated, stripped of muscle layers by blunt dissection, mounted in Ussing chambers (area 0.7 cm2), and bathed in oxygenated bicarbonate Ringer’s solution containing 10 μM indomethacin. Short-circuit current was measured after inhibition of Na+ current by amiloride (10 μM), followed by stimulation by forskolin (20 μM) and subsequent inhibitor addition.
The primary screen was designed to identify compounds that inhibited CFTR Cl– conductance by direct CFTR-inhibitor interaction. CFTR was prestimulated in CFTR-expressing FRT cells by an activating cocktail containing forskolin, IBMX, and apigenin (Figure 1a). The rationale for CFTR activation by multiple mechanisms (cAMP elevation, phosphodiesterase inhibition, and direct CFTR binding) was to identify inhibitors that blocked the CFTR Cl– transporting pathway directly rather than blocking a more proximal step(s) in the activation pathway. The FRT cells coexpressed a yellow fluorescent protein–based Cl–/I– sensor that provided a quantitative fluorescence read-out of inhibition potency (12, 13). After CFTR prestimulation and compound addition, cells were subjected to an inwardly directed I– gradient to drive I– influx and produce decreasing fluorescence. Each assay consisted of recording of base-line fluorescence for 2 seconds, followed by 12 seconds of continuous recording of fluorescence after rapid addition of the solution containing I–. Compounds were tested separately at 10 μM concentration in a 96-well format using a fully automated high-throughput screening apparatus (see Methods).
Figure 1b shows representative curves from the primary screen of 50,000 compounds. As quantified from the slope of the decreasing fluorescence after I– addition, 49,993 compounds had no significant effect on the kinetics of I– influx (<10% decrease in slope). Seven compounds produced a small decrease in negative slope (10–52%), nearly all of which had a similar core structure consisting of a 2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone heterocycle with substituted phenylmethylene and phenyl moieties (Figure 1c, top). More than 250 analogs having thiazolidinone core structure were subsequently screened to identify the most potent CFTR inhibitors. Figure 1c (bottom) shows the most potent compound, 3-[(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-5-[(4-carboxyphenyl)methylene]-2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone (CFTRinh-172), along with five analogs having lower inhibitory potencies. Inhibition required the 3-trifluoromethyl substitution on ring 1 and a negative or polar substituent(s) on ring 2. Interestingly, the five-member heterocycle and trifluoromethyl substituent in CFTRinh-172 were present in several high-affinity CFTR activators that were identified recently by high-throughput screening (15). To examine the effect of ring position of the trifluoromethyl and carboxyl substituents, eight analogs of CFTRinh-172 were synthesized in which the substituents were moved to each unique position on rings 1 (trifluoromethyl) and 2 (carboxy). Compared with CFTRinh-172 (potency 1.0), the relative inhibitory potencies of the 3-[(a-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-5-[(b-carboxyphenyl)methylene]-2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone analogs were 0.69 (a = 2, b = 2), 0.70 (a = 2, b = 3), 0.66 (a = 2, b = 4), 0.74 (a = 3, b = 2), 0.90 (a = 3, b = 3), 0.67 (a = 4, b = 2), 0.64 (a = 4, b = 3), and 0.56 (a = 4, b = 4). As the most potent CFTR inhibitor, CFTRinh-172 was further characterized.
Figure 2a shows dose-inhibition data for CFTRinh-172 as determined by the fluorescence assay. Significant inhibition was seen at 0.3–0.6 μM CFTRinh-172. Figure 2b shows that inhibition by CFTRinh-172 was complete in approximately 10 minutes (t1/2 4 minutes) and was reversed after washout with t1/2 approximately 5 minutes (inset). Figure 2c shows that CFTRinh-172 effectively inhibited CFTR activation by multiple types of agonists that were not included in the activating cocktail used for initial screening, including genistein, CPT-cAMP, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (CPX), 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MPO), and the potent benzoflavone CFTR activator UCCF-029 and the benzimidazolone CFTR activator UCCF-853 (14). Also, CFTRinh-172 inhibited CFTR activation by four recently described CFTR activators (CFTRact-05, -09, -11, and -16; ref. 15) that are structurally unrelated and probably activate CFTR by a direct interaction mechanism (not shown).
Characterization of CFTR inhibition by CFTRinh-172. (a) CFTR functional assays as in Figure 1b for indicated [CFTRinh-172]. (b) Time course of inhibition showing CFTR-mediated I– transport rates at different times after addition of 2 μM CFTRinh-172. Inset: Time course of inhibition reversal showing I– transport rates at different times after washout of 1 μM CFTRinh-172. Mean ± SE is shown from three sets of experiments. (c) Inhibition of CFTR after stimulation by different agonists, including benzoflavone and benzimidazolone UCCF compounds (14), genistein, CPT-cAMP, 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MPO), and 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (CPX) (all 50 μM) (SE; three sets of experiments). Black bars, agonist; white bars, agonist + 5 μM CFTRinh-172.
Electrophysiology was done to establish the inhibitory potency and specificity of CFTRinh-172. Figure 3a (left) shows the rapid, dose-dependent inhibition of short-circuit current in CFTR-expressing FRT cells with CFTRinh-172 added to the solution bathing the apical cell surface. Figure 3a (right) shows the average dose-inhibition relationships of CFTRinh-172 (Kd ∼300 nM, Hill coefficient ∼1) and glibenclamide (Kd ∼200 μM) tested under identical conditions. Similar inhibitory potencies were found in cells that natively express wild-type CFTR, including T84 cells and primary cultures of human bronchial epithelial cells, as well as in transfected FRT cells expressing G551D-CFTR and ΔF508-CFTR (after low temperature correction) (not shown). For studies in bronchial cells, the Na+ channel was blocked with amiloride so that base-line current is largely CFTR-dependent. After maximal CFTR activation by a CPT-cAMP, application of CFTRinh-172 from the apical side inhibited short-circuit current strongly (Figure 3b, left). CFTRinh-172 was apparently less potent when added from the basolateral side (Figure 3b, right); this may be related to reduced access through the porous filter, or, less likely, to its differential permeability across the apical versus the basolateral plasma membranes or to compartmentation phenomena in epithelial cells.
Electrophysiological analysis of CFTR inhibition. (a) Left: CFTRinh-172 inhibition of short-circuit current (Isc) in permeabilized FRT cells expressing human CFTR. CFTR was stimulated by 100 μM CPT-cAMP. Right: Dose-inhibition data for CFTRinh-172 (circles) and glibenclamide (squares) (SE; n = 3 sets of experiments). (b) CFTRinh-172 inhibition of short-circuit current in primary culture of (nonpermeabilized) human bronchial epithelial cells. Inhibitor was added in apical bathing solution (left) or basolateral and then apical solutions (right). (c) Left: Whole-cell patch clamp of CFTR-expressing FRT cells showing membrane currents elicited at +80 mV (open circles) and –100 mV (filled circles). CFTR was stimulated by 5 μM forskolin followed by addition of 2 μM CFTRinh-172. The alternate stimulation was interrupted (I–III) for application of graded membrane potentials (middle). Right: Current-voltage relationships under basal conditions (control, open circles), after forskolin stimulation (filled circles), and following addition of 0.2 μM CFTRinh-172 giving approximately 50% inhibition (open triangles). Im, membrane current; Vm, membrane potential.
Whole-cell membrane currents were measured by patch clamp in CFTR-expressing FRT cells (Figure 3c, left). Stimulation by 5 μM forskolin produced a membrane current of 381 ± 47 pA/pF (n = 4) at +100 mV (total membrane capacitance 21 ± 3 pF). The current-voltage relationship was linear, as expected for a pure CFTR current (Figure 3c, right). Extracellular perfusion with 2 μM CFTRinh-172 produced a rapid reduction in current at all membrane potentials, suggesting voltage-independent CFTR inhibition. The lack of voltage-dependence of channel block was confirmed using a lower concentration of CFTRinh-172 (0.2 μM) to obtain about 50% inhibition (Figure 3c, right).
The specificity of CFTRinh-172 for inhibition of CFTR was studied. Two non-CFTR Cl– channels were studied. CFTRinh-172 at 5 μM did not inhibit Ca2+-activated Cl– secretion produced by addition of UTP (100 μM) to the apical bathing solution in polarized human bronchial epithelial cells (Figure 4a, left). Maximal UTP-dependent short-circuit currents were 9.9 ± 0.5 μA/cm2 and 10.0 ± 0.2 μA/cm2 in the absence and presence of CFTRinh-172, respectively (SE; n = 4). CFTRinh-172 at 5 μM also did not block volume-activated Cl– currents elicited in FRT cells by extracellular perfusion with a 250 mosM/kg hypotonic solution (Figure 4a, right).
Specificity of CFTR inhibition by CFTRinh-172. (a) Alternative Cl– channels. Left: UTP (100 μM) stimulated Ca2+-dependent Cl– secretion measured in short-circuit current measurements on airway epithelial cells in the absence and presence of 5 μM CFTRinh-172. Right: Volume-activated Cl– current (hypotonic 250 mosM/kg H2O) measured in whole-cell patch-clamp experiments on FRT cells. Currents were recorded in the absence and presence of 5 μM CFTRinh-172. (b) MDR-1 activity. 3H-vincristine accumulation in 9HTEo-/Dx cells with upregulated MDR-1 expression. Intracellular vincristine was measured with and without verapamil (100 μM) or CFTRinh-172 (5 μM) (SE; n = 3). (c) ATP-sensitive K+ channels. Left: Representative membrane potential recording from a pancreatic β cell (INS-1) perfused extracellularly with CFTRinh-172, diazoxide (100 μM), and glibenclamide (glib; 10 μM). Right: Averaged changes in membrane potential (ΔmV) caused by indicated maneuvers (SE; n = 4). PD, potential difference.
The activity of a CFTR homolog, the ATP-binding cassette transporter MDR-1, was measured in 9HTEo-/Dx cells, which overexpress MDR-1 (16). Vincristine accumulation, which is inversely related to active drug extrusion by MDR-1, was strongly increased by the MDR-1 inhibitor verapamil (100 μM) (Figure 4b). CFTRinh-172 (5 μM) did not affect vincristine accumulation and thus did not inhibit MDR-1. Another homolog of CFTR is the sulphonylurea receptor (SUR), which regulates the activity of ATP-sensitive K+ channels (K-ATP channel; ref. 21). SUR1 is expressed in pancreatic β cells, where it controls membrane potential and insulin release. Sulphonylureas like glibenclamide cause insulin release (and a hypoglycemic response) by blocking K-ATP channels and membrane depolarization. To determine whether CFTRinh-172 also blocks K-ATP channels, membrane potential in a rat pancreatic β cell line, INS-1, was measured (Figure 4c). In contrast to glibenclamide, which caused large membrane depolarization, CFTRinh-172 (2 and 5 μM) did not depolarize membrane potential. CFTRinh-172 at 5 μM caused a small hyperpolarization that was much less than that caused by the K-ATP channel activator diazoxide (100 μM). Additional studies (not shown) indicated that CFTRinh-172 at 5 μM did not block a water channel (AQP1), a urea transporter (UT-B), an Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE3), and a Cl–/HCO3– exchanger (AE1).
Further analysis showed that 5 μM CFTRinh-172 did not affect cellular cAMP production or phosphatase activity. In FRT cells, basal cAMP content was 225 ± 22 fmol/well, which increased at 30 minutes after stimulation by 20 μM forskolin to 1,290 ± 190 fmol/well (no inhibitor) and 1,140 ± 50 (+CFTRinh-172) (n = 3). As judged using the dihydrorhodamine assay, CFTRinh-172 was nontoxic to FRT cells after 24 hours at concentrations up to 100 μM. In mice, intraperitoneal injection of 1,000 μg/kg CFTRinh-172 daily for 7 days did not cause overt toxicity. Food and water intake were not diminished, and serum electrolyte concentrations, glucose, liver function indices, serum creatinine, amylase, and hematocrit were not changed. In addition, a single very large systemic dose of CFTRinh-172 (10 mg/kg) did not cause overt toxicity.
The efficacy of CFTRinh-172 was tested in vivo using two assays of cholera toxin–induced intestinal fluid secretion, and in isolated intestine by short-circuit analysis. In the first assay, a series of closed loops of small intestine were created in vivo, and the lumens of alternate loops were injected with small volumes of saline or saline containing cholera toxin. Luminal fluid accumulation was determined after 6 hours. As seen visually, there was marked fluid accumulation and distention in cholera toxin–treated loops, whereas adjacent control (saline) loops remained empty (Figure 5a). A single administration of CFTRinh-172 (250 μg/kg intraperitoneally) prior to cholera toxin infusion effectively prevented fluid accumulation in the toxin-treated intestinal loops. Data from a series of experiments are summarized in Figure 5b. CFTRinh-172 significantly reduced fluid secretion to that in saline control loops, whereas an inactive CFTRinh-172 analog did not inhibit fluid secretion. As suggested from previous data (22), cholera toxin–treated loops of intestine from homozygous ΔF508-CFTR mice also remained empty, indicating the involvement of CFTR in intestinal fluid secretion. In the second assay, intestinal fluid secretion was induced by oral administration of cholera toxin (10 μg), and CFTRinh-172 was administered systemically. After 6 hours there was marked accumulation of fluid, as measured by weighing the entire small intestine. CFTRinh-172 administration remarkably reduced intestinal fluid accumulation, as seen visually and quantified by the ratio of intestinal weight before versus after luminal fluid removal (Figure 5c).
Inhibition of intestinal fluid secretion. (a) Photograph of isolated mouse ileal loops at 6 hours after lumenal injection of 1 μg cholera toxin without (top) and with (middle) intraperitoneal injection of CFTRinh-172 (250 μg/kg). Saline control (no cholera toxin) is shown for comparison (bottom). (b) Ileal loop weight at 6 hours. Mean ± SE (n = 6–8 mice) with 14–16 loops studied. For the inactive analog, the 4-carboxyphenyl substituent in CFTRinh-172 was replaced by 3-methoxy-4-methoxyvinylphenyl (SE; six to eight mice per group; *P < 0.001, ANOVA). (c) Ratio of weight of entire small intestine at 6 hours after oral gavage before versus after luminal fluid removal (SE; four mice per group; *P < 0.001). (d) CFTRinh-172 inhibition short-circuit current after amiloride addition and stimulation by forskolin (20 μM) in isolated rat colonic mucosa. CFTRinh-172 was added to serosal and then mucosal surfaces as indicated. One experiment typical of four is shown.
Figure 5d shows CFTRinh-172 inhibition of short-circuit current across intact rat colonic mucosa. After inhibition of Na+ current by amiloride, forskolin produced a prompt increase in short-circuit current. CFTRinh-172 added to the mucosal solution inhibited short-circuit current with greater efficacy than CFTRinh-172 added to the serosal solution; this may be related to impaired access to colonic epithelial cells through the residual submucosal tissue. Addition of 5 μM CFTRinh-172 to the mucosal solution alone reduced short-circuit current by more than 80% (not shown). These results provide electrophysiological evidence for CFTR Cl– channel inhibition by CFTRinh-172 in intestine.
The purpose of this study was to identify high-affinity CFTR inhibitors for application to studies of CF disease mechanisms and to the treatment of secretory diarrheas. We screened a collection of small, drug-like compounds using an assay designed to identify CFTR inhibitors that interact directly with CFTR. Since multiple CFTR activators that work on different activating pathways were included, we reasoned that any inhibitory compounds should interact at or near the CFTR Cl– transporting pathway. The primary screening of 50,000 diverse compounds identified a small set of putative inhibitors of the 2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone compound class. These compounds are unrelated structurally to known CFTR activators and to the CFTR inhibitors diphenylamine-2-carboxylate (DPC), 5-nitro-2(3-phenylpropyl-amino)benzoate (NPPB), and glibenclamide. The most potent CFTR inhibitor identified by screening of a library of structural analogs had a KI of about 300 nM for inhibition of Cl– current in human airway cells. Inhibition was rapid, reversible, and voltage-independent. At concentrations at which CFTR Cl– conductance was nearly completely blocked, the inhibitor did not inhibit other Cl– channels, MDR-1, ATP-sensitive K+ channels, or other transporters. The inhibitor was nontoxic in mice, where a systemically administered dose 100 times that inhibiting cholera toxin–induced fluid secretion was well tolerated.
The new class of CFTR inhibitors identified here may be useful for development of drugs to block intestinal fluid secretion in cholera and other secretory diarrheas such as AIDS-related diarrhea and traveler’s (Escherichia coli) diarrhea. Secretory diarrhea is the largest cause of infant death in developing countries, with about 5 million deaths annually (23). Several studies, including those in CF mice, suggest that CFTR is the final common pathway for intestinal Cl– (and thus fluid) secretion in response to various agonists (22, 24, 25). The mouse models of intestinal fluid secretion used here indicate that CFTR inhibition by systemic administration of the inhibitor at a nontoxic dose effectively blocked intestinal fluid secretion induced by cholera toxin. Inhibitor testing in larger animal models is needed, as is analysis of stool output using live Vibrio cholerae (26).
The pharmacological creation of the CF phenotype in human tissues and animal models may facilitate elucidation of the mechanism by which defective CFTR causes lung disease and clinical morbidity in CF. There is increasing evidence that defective fluid and macromolecular secretion by airway submucosal glands leads to impaired mucociliary function and bacterial clearance in CF; however, functional studies in human airway glands have been restricted to severely diseased airways obtained at the time of lung transplantation (27). Acute CFTR inhibition should permit determination of the role of CFTR in water, salt, and macromolecule secretion by submucosal glands. There is considerable interest but so far little progress in the identification or creation of large-animal models of CF. High-affinity CFTR inhibitors may permit the pharmacological creation of a CF animal model that mimics the human CF phenotype. A large-animal model of CF would be of great value in elucidating the pathophysiology of initiation and progression of airway disease in CF, and in evaluating the efficacy of CF therapies.
This work was supported by a drug discovery grant from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF), and grants HL-60288, HL-59198, EB-00415, EY-13574, and DK-35124 from the NIH (to A.S. Verkman). L.J.V. Galietta was supported by the CFF and the Telethon-Italy (GP0296Y01). J.R. Thiagarajah was supported by a CFF fellowship.
See the related Commentary beginning on page 1599.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR); cystic fibrosis (CF); Fischer rat thyroid (FRT); multidrug resistance protein-1 (MDR-1).