Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with subsequent lenalidomide maintenance is standard consolidation therapy for multiple myeloma, and a subset of patients achieve durable progression-free survival that is suggestive of long-term immune control. Nonetheless, most patients ultimately relapse, suggesting immune escape. TIGIT appears to be a potent inhibitor of myeloma-specific immunity and represents a promising new checkpoint target. Here we demonstrate high expression of TIGIT on activated CD8+ T cells in mobilized peripheral blood stem cell grafts from patients with myeloma. To guide clinical application of TIGIT inhibition, we evaluated identical anti-TIGIT antibodies that do or do not engage FcγR and demonstrated that anti-TIGIT activity is dependent on FcγR binding. We subsequently used CRBN mice to investigate the efficacy of anti-TIGIT in combination with lenalidomide maintenance after transplantation. Notably, the combination of anti-TIGIT with lenalidomide provided synergistic, CD8+ T cell–dependent, antimyeloma efficacy. Analysis of bone marrow (BM) CD8+ T cells demonstrated that combination therapy suppressed T cell exhaustion, enhanced effector function, and expanded central memory subsets. Importantly, these immune phenotypes were specific to the BM tumor microenvironment. Collectively, these data provide a logical rationale for combining TIGIT inhibition with immunomodulatory drugs to prevent myeloma progression after ASCT.
Simone A. Minnie, Olivia G. Waltner, Kathleen S. Ensbey, Stuart D. Olver, Alika D. Collinge, David P. Sester, Christine R. Schmidt, Samuel R.W. Legg, Shuichiro Takahashi, Nicole S. Nemychenkov, Tomoko Sekiguchi, Gregory Driessens, Ping Zhang, Motoko Koyama, Andrew Spencer, Leona A. Holmberg, Scott N. Furlan, Antiopi Varelias, Geoffrey R. Hill
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,360 | 195 |
154 | 68 | |
Figure | 379 | 5 |
Supplemental data | 61 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 80 | 0 |
Totals | 2,034 | 272 |
Total Views | 2,306 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.