Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2021;131(22):e148225. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI148225.
Abstract
Metabolic pathways regulate immune responses and disrupted metabolism leads to immune dysfunction and disease. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is driven by imbalanced immune responses, yet the role of immunometabolism in COVID-19 pathogenesis remains unclear. By investigating 87 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 6 critically ill non–COVID-19 patients, and 47 uninfected controls, we found an immunometabolic dysregulation in patients with progressed COVID-19. Specifically, T cells, monocytes, and granulocytes exhibited increased mitochondrial mass, yet only T cells accumulated intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), were metabolically quiescent, and showed a disrupted mitochondrial architecture. During recovery, T cell ROS decreased to match the uninfected controls. Transcriptionally, T cells from severe/critical COVID-19 patients showed an induction of ROS-responsive genes as well as genes related to mitochondrial function and the basigin network. Basigin (CD147) ligands cyclophilin A and the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein triggered ROS production in T cells in vitro. In line with this, only PCR-positive patients showed increased ROS levels. Dexamethasone treatment resulted in a downregulation of ROS in vitro and T cells from dexamethasone-treated patients exhibited low ROS and basigin levels. This was reflected by changes in the transcriptional landscape. Our findings provide evidence of an immunometabolic dysregulation in COVID-19 that can be mitigated by dexamethasone treatment.
Authors
Peter J. Siska, Sonja-Maria Decking, Nathalie Babl, Carina Matos, Christina Bruss, Katrin Singer, Jana Klitzke, Marian Schön, Jakob Simeth, Josef Köstler, Heiko Siegmund, Ines Ugele, Michael Paulus, Alexander Dietl, Kristina Kolodova, Louisa Steines, Katharina Freitag, Alice Peuker, Gabriele Schönhammer, Johanna Raithel, Bernhard Graf, Florian Geismann, Matthias Lubnow, Matthias Mack, Peter Hau, Christopher Bohr, Ralph Burkhardt, Andre Gessner, Bernd Salzberger, Ralf Wagner, Frank Hanses, Florian Hitzenbichler, Daniel Heudobler, Florian Lüke, Tobias Pukrop, Wolfgang Herr, Daniel Wolff, Rainer Spang, Hendrik Poeck, Petra Hoffmann, Jonathan Jantsch, Christoph Brochhausen, Dirk Lunz, Michael Rehli, Marina Kreutz, Kathrin Renner
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 893 | 177 |
| 130 | 53 | |
| Figure | 462 | 3 |
| Supplemental data | 123 | 10 |
| Citation downloads | 82 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,690 | 243 |
| Total Views | 1,933 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)