Usage Information

Treatment of latent M. tuberculosis infection and use of antiretroviral therapy to prevent tuberculosis
Timothy R. Sterling, Philana Ling Lin
Timothy R. Sterling, Philana Ling Lin
Published August 24, 2020
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(10):5102-5104. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI137294.
View: Text | PDF
Commentary

Treatment of latent M. tuberculosis infection and use of antiretroviral therapy to prevent tuberculosis

Abstract

Even with treatment of HIV with antiretroviral therapy (ART), the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation remains higher in HIV-infected than HIV-uninfected persons. In this issue of the JCI, Ganatra et al. explored TB reactivation in the context of ART using TB and simian immunodeficiency virus–coinfected (TB/SIV-coinfected) nonhuman primates. The authors found that treating rhesus macaques with ART restored CD4+ T cells in whole blood, spleen, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, but not in the lung interstitium. TB risk was not decreased in the coinfected macaques treated with ART for 14–63 days, suggesting that ART does not decrease the short-term risk of reactivation. Reactivation occurred as CD4+ T cells were increasing, which is consistent with observations made in humans. This study provides a potential model for systematic evaluation of TB/SIV coinfection and different treatment regimens and strategies to prevent TB reactivation.

Authors

Timothy R. Sterling, Philana Ling Lin

×

Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 354 42
PDF 66 14
Figure 61 0
Citation downloads 67 0
Totals 548 56
Total Views 604

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement