Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Phase I trial of donor-derived modified immune cell infusion in kidney transplantation
Christian Morath, … , Matthias Schaier, Peter Terness
Christian Morath, … , Matthias Schaier, Peter Terness
Published January 28, 2020
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(5):2364-2376. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI133595.
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Article has an altmetric score of 11

Phase I trial of donor-derived modified immune cell infusion in kidney transplantation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Preclinical experiments have shown that donor blood cells, modified in vitro by an alkylating agent (modified immune cells [MICs]), induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor.METHODS In this phase I trial, patients received either 1.5 × 106 MICs per kg BW on day –2 (n = 3, group A), or 1.5 × 108 MICs per kg BW on day –2 (n = 3, group B) or day –7 (n = 4, group C) before living donor kidney transplantation in addition to post-transplantation immunosuppression. The primary outcome measure was the frequency of adverse events (AEs) until day 30 (study phase) with follow-up out to day 360.RESULTS MIC infusions were extremely well tolerated. During the study phase, 10 treated patients experienced a total of 69 AEs that were unlikely to be related or not related to MIC infusion. No donor-specific human leukocyte antigen Abs or rejection episodes were noted, even though the patients received up to 1.3 × 1010 donor mononuclear cells before transplantation. Group C patients with low immunosuppression during follow-up showed no in vitro reactivity against stimulatory donor blood cells on day 360, whereas reactivity against third-party cells was still preserved. Frequencies of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi transitional B lymphocytes (Bregs) increased from a median of 6% before MIC infusion to 20% on day 180, which was 19- and 68-fold higher, respectively, than in 2 independent cohorts of transplanted controls. The majority of Bregs produced the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10. MIC-treated patients showed the Immune Tolerance Network operational tolerance signature.CONCLUSION MIC administration was safe and could be a future tool for the targeted induction of tolerogenic Bregs.TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT number: 2014-002086-30; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02560220.FUNDING Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Technology, Berlin, Germany, and TolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.

Authors

Christian Morath, Anita Schmitt, Christian Kleist, Volker Daniel, Gerhard Opelz, Caner Süsal, Eman Ibrahim, Florian Kälble, Claudius Speer, Christian Nusshag, Luiza Pego da Silva, Claudia Sommerer, Lei Wang, Ming Ni, Angela Hückelhoven-Krauss, David Czock, Uta Merle, Arianeb Mehrabi, Anja Sander, Matthes Hackbusch, Christoph Eckert, Rüdiger Waldherr, Paul Schnitzler, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Jörg D. Hoheisel, Shakhawan A. Mustafa, Mohamed S.S. Alhamdani, Andrea S. Bauer, Jochen Reiser, Martin Zeier, Michael Schmitt, Matthias Schaier, Peter Terness

×

Figure 4

Bregs in MIC-treated patients compared with Bregs in transplanted controls.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Bregs in MIC-treated patients compared with Bregs in transplanted contro...
(A) PBLs were gated in a FSC/SSC dot plot (gate R1). B lymphocytes were gated using a CD19/SSC gate (gate R2). CD19+CD24+ cells were determined (gate R3) within the CD19+ B lymphocytes (gate R2). On the basis of gate R3, CD24hiCD38hi B lymphocytes were analyzed (gate R6) and assigned as CD19+CD24hiCD38hi transitional B lymphocytes (Bregs). IL-10 production of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi transitional B lymphocytes was further investigated using a CD38/IL-10 gate based on gate R6. (B) Individual measurements of the percentage of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Bregs in patients R7, R11, R12, and R14 from day –7 to day 360. CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Bregs were low out to day 30 after kidney transplantation and increased out to day 180. (C) Individual measurements of the percentage of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Bregs in patients in group C (black circles) were compared with measurements in transplanted controls (red circles). Individual measurements and the median are shown. Compared with transplanted controls, Breg percentages were 4, 3, 9, 19, 26, and 13 times higher in patients in group C on days 60, 90, 135, 180, 270, and 360 after transplantation, respectively. (D) Individual measurements of the percentage of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Bregs in patients in group C were compared with measurements in a second independent cohort of transplanted controls stratified according to steroid dose (shown in parentheses). Individual measurements and the median are shown. Compared with transplanted controls without steroid treatment, Breg percentages were 68 and 44 times higher in patients in group C on days 180 and 360 after transplantation, respectively. (E) Percentage of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Bregs in frozen cells from patients in groups A–C. The median and interquartile range are shown. In contrast to the percentage of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Bregs from patients in groups B and C, the percentage of Bregs for patients in group A were 68 and 20 times higher, respectively, on day 180 after transplantation. (F) Percentage of IL-10–producing Bregs. Individual measurements and the median are shown for cumulative post-transplantation data for patients in group C. The majority of Bregs were producing the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 17 X users
On 2 Facebook pages
Referenced by 1 Bluesky users
62 readers on Mendeley
See more details