Cardiac pacemaking offers a unique opportunity for direct gene transfer into the heart. An experimental system was developed to assay the effects of transferring the human beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) under in vitro, ex vivo, and finally in vivo conditions. Constructs encoding either beta2AR or LacZ were used in chronotropy studies with isolated myocytes, and transplanted as well as endogenous murine hearts. Murine embryonic cardiac myocytes were transiently transfected with plasmid constructs. The total percentage of myocytes spontaneously contracting was greater in beta2AR transfected cells, as compared with control cells (67 vs. 42+/-5%). In addition, the percentage of myocytes with chronotropic rates > 60 beats per minute (bpm) was higher in the beta2AR population, as compared with control cells (37 vs. 15+/-5%). The average contractile rate was greater in the beta2AR transfected myocytes at baseline (71+/-14 vs. 50+/-10 bpm; P < 0.001) as well as with the addition of 10(-)3 M isoproterenol (98+/-26 vs. 75+/-18 bpm; P < 0.05). Based on these results, a murine neonatal cardiac transplantation model was used to study the ex vivo effects of targeted expression of beta2AR. The constructs were transfected into the right atrium of transplanted hearts. Injection of the beta2AR construct increased the heart rate by approximately 40% (224+/-37 vs. 161+/-42 bpm; P < 0.005). Finally, the constructs were tested in vivo with injection into the right atrium of the endogenous heart. These results were similar to the ex vivo data with injection of the beta2AR constructs increasing the endogenous heart rates by approximately 40%, as compared with control injected hearts (550+/-42 vs. 390+/-37 bpm; P < 0.05). These studies demonstrate that local targeting of gene expression may be a feasible modality to regulate the cardiac pacemaking activity.
J M Edelberg, W C Aird, R D Rosenberg
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 273 | 15 |
45 | 20 | |
Citation downloads | 57 | 0 |
Totals | 375 | 35 |
Total Views | 410 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.