Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Signaling through CD28 and CTLA-4 controls two distinct forms of T cell anergy
Andrew D. Wells, … , Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Laurence A. Turka
Andrew D. Wells, … , Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Laurence A. Turka
Published September 15, 2001
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2001;108(6):895-904. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI13220.
View: Text | PDF
Article Article has an altmetric score of 7

Signaling through CD28 and CTLA-4 controls two distinct forms of T cell anergy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Primary T cell proliferative responses to TCR ligation plus CD28 costimulation are surprisingly heterogeneous. Many cells that enter G1 fail to progress further through the cell cycle, and some of these cells subsequently fail to divide upon restimulation, even in the presence of IL-2. Such IL-2–refractory anergy is distinct from the IL-2–reversible anergy induced by TCR occupancy in the absence of CD28 costimulation. Here, we focus on the contributions of cell cycle progression and costimulatory (CD28/CTLA-4) signals in the regulation of anergy. We show that CD28 costimulation is not sufficient for anergy avoidance and that activated T cells must progress through the cell cycle in order to escape anergy. Induction of this “division-arrest” form of anergy requires CTLA-4 signaling during the primary response. Also, cell division per se is not sufficient for anergy avoidance: the few T cells that undergo multiple rounds of cell division during overt CD28 costimulatory blockade do not escape the ultimate induction of clonal anergy. Anergy avoidance by primary T cells is thus a multistep process: in order to participate in a productive immune response, an individual T cell activated through its antigen receptor must receive CD28 costimulation and progress through the cell cycle. Anergy may be induced either through a combination of CTLA-4 signaling and the failure of cell cycle progression, or through a proliferation-independent mechanism in which TCR ligation occurs in the absence of CD28.

Authors

Andrew D. Wells, Matthew C. Walsh, Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Laurence A. Turka

×

Figure 3

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Regulation of primary T cell division by B7–CTLA-4 interactions. (a) Poo...
Regulation of primary T cell division by B7–CTLA-4 interactions. (a) Pooled BALB/c lymph node and spleen cells were labeled with CFSE, and T cells were subjected to co-crosslinking of TCR and CD28 by the addition of polystyrene beads coated with anti-CD3 (1 μg/ml), anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml), and control hamster IgG (1 μg/ml). (b) In separate cultures, T cells were subjected to co-crosslinking of TCR, CD28, and CTLA-4 by the addition of polystyrene beads coated with anti-CD3 (1 μg/ml), anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml), and anti–CTLA-4 (1 μg/ml). Proliferation of the CD4+ T cell subset was assessed by flow cytometry 3 days later. The frequency of precursor T cells that divided in response to stimulus (RF), and the number of daughter T cells generated by the average responding precursor T cell (CP), were calculated as described previously (2, 3). The data are representative of two separate experiments.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Referenced in 4 patents
Highlighted by 1 platforms
87 readers on Mendeley
See more details