Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 3

See more details

Referenced in 1 clinical guideline sources
44 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (236)

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI119505

Direct, MHC-dependent presentation of the drug sulfamethoxazole to human alphabeta T cell clones.

B Schnyder, D Mauri-Hellweg, M Zanni, F Bettens, and W J Pichler

Institute of Immunology and Allergology, Inselspital, CH-3010-Bern, Switzerland.

Find articles by Schnyder, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Institute of Immunology and Allergology, Inselspital, CH-3010-Bern, Switzerland.

Find articles by Mauri-Hellweg, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Institute of Immunology and Allergology, Inselspital, CH-3010-Bern, Switzerland.

Find articles by Zanni, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Institute of Immunology and Allergology, Inselspital, CH-3010-Bern, Switzerland.

Find articles by Bettens, F. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Institute of Immunology and Allergology, Inselspital, CH-3010-Bern, Switzerland.

Find articles by Pichler, W. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published July 1, 1997 - More info

Published in Volume 100, Issue 1 on July 1, 1997
J Clin Invest. 1997;100(1):136–141. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI119505.
© 1997 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published July 1, 1997 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

T cells can recognize small molecular compounds like drugs. It is thought that covalent binding to MHC bound peptides is required for such a hapten stimulation. Sulfamethoxazole, like most drugs, is not chemically reactive per se, but is thought to gain the ability to covalently bind to proteins after intracellular drug metabolism. The purpose of this study was to investigate how sulfamethoxazole is presented in an immunogenic form to sulfamethoxazole-specific T cell clones. The stimulation of four CD4(+) and two CD8(+) sulfamethoxazole-specific T cell clones by different antigen-presenting cells (APC) was measured both by proliferation and cytolytic assays. The MHC restriction was evaluated, first, by inhibition using anti-class I and anti-class II mAb, and second, by the degree of sulfamethoxazole-induced stimulation by partially matched APC. Fixation of APC was performed with glutaraldehyde 0.05%. The clones were specific for sulfamethoxazole without cross-reaction to other sulfonamides. The continuous presence of sulfamethoxazole was required during the assay period since pulsing of the APC was not sufficient to induce proliferation or cytotoxicity. Stimulation of clones required the addition of MHC compatible APC. The APC could be fixed without impairing their ability to present sulfamethoxazole. Sulfamethoxazole can be presented in an unstable, but MHC-restricted fashion, which is independent of processing. These features are best explained by a direct, noncovalent binding of sulfamethoxazole to the MHC-peptide complex.

Version history
  • Version 1 (July 1, 1997): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 3
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (236)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Referenced in 1 clinical guideline sources
44 readers on Mendeley
See more details