Clinical experience suggests nephrotic patients are at risk for malnutrition. To determine if nephrotic patients can adapt successfully to a protein-restricted diet, nephrotic (glomerular filtration rate, 52+/-15 ml/min; urinary protein [Uprot.], 7.2+/-2.2 grams/d) and control subjects completed a crossover comparison of diets providing 0.8 or 1.6 grams protein (plus 1 gram protein/gram Uprot.) and 35 kcal per kg per day. Nitrogen balance (BN) was determined and whole body protein turnover measured during fasting and feeding using intravenous -[1-13C]leucine and intragastric -[5,5, 5- 2H3]leucine. BN was positive in both nephrotic and control subjects consuming either diet and rates of whole-body protein synthesis, protein degradation, and leucine oxidation did not differ between groups. In both nephrotic and control subjects anabolism was due to a suppression of whole-body protein degradation and stimulation of protein synthesis during feeding. The principal compensatory response to dietary protein restriction was a decrease in amino acid oxidation and this response was the same in both groups. With the low protein diet leucine oxidation rates during feeding correlated inversely with Uprot. losses (r = -0.83; P < 0. 05). Conclusions: (a) a diet providing 0.8 gram protein (plus 1 gram protein/gram Uprot.) and 35 kcal per kg per day maintains BN in nephrotic patients; (b) nephrotic patients activate normal anabolic responses to dietary protein restriction (suppression of amino acid oxidation) and feeding (stimulation of protein synthesis and inhibition of protein degradation); (c) the inverse correlation between leucine oxidation and Uprot. losses suggests that proteinuria is a stimulus to conserve dietary essential amino acids.
B J Maroni, C Staffeld, V R Young, A Manatunga, K Tom
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 224 | 40 |
57 | 45 | |
Citation downloads | 58 | 0 |
Totals | 339 | 85 |
Total Views | 424 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.