To understand the factors contributing to the synthesis of human apolipoprotein AI (apoAI), relative apoAI synthesis was measured from endoscopic biopsy samples obtained from 18 healthy volunteers. The relative amount of apoAI synthesis was directly correlated with steady state intestinal apoAI mRNA levels and a 10-fold within-group variability was observed. Analysis of genomic DNA from the subjects revealed five polymorphic sites which defined two haplotypes in the intestinal enhancer region of the apoAI gene located upstream of the apolipoprotein CIII gene transcriptional start site (+ 1): (-641 C to A, -630 G to A, -625 T to deletion, -482 C to T, and -455 T to C). The population frequencies of the wild-type and mutant alleles were 0.53 and 0.44, respectively. Mean steady state apoAI mRNA levels and mean relative apoAI synthesis were 49 and 37% lower, respectively, in homozygotes for the mutant allele and 28 and 41% lower, respectively, in heterozygotes than in homozygotes for the wild-type allele (P < 0.05 for both). Site-directed mutants of apoAI gene promoter/reporter constructs containing the above mutations were transfected into Caco-2 cells and showed a 46% decrease in transcriptional activity compared with the wild type (P < 0.001); however, no significant differences were observed in HepG2 cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that the mutated sequences from -655 to -610 bound Caco-2 cell nuclear protein(s) while the wild type did not. These results indicate that intestinal apoAI gene transcription and protein synthesis are genetically determined and are reduced in the presence of common mutations which induced binding of nuclear protein(s), possibly a transcriptional repressor.
S Naganawa, H N Ginsberg, R M Glickman, G S Ginsburg
Usage data is cumulative from August 2023 through August 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 121 | 22 |
77 | 23 | |
Citation downloads | 42 | 0 |
Totals | 240 | 45 |
Total Views | 285 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.