Time- and voltage-dependent local anesthetic effects on sodium (Na) currents are generally interpreted using modulated receptor models that require formation of drug-associated nonconducting states with high affinity for the inactivated channel. The availability of inactivation-deficient Na channels has enabled us to test this traditional view of the drug-channel interaction. Rat skeletal muscle Na channels were mutated in the III-IV linker to disable fast inactivation (F1304Q: FQ). Lidocaine accelerated the decay of whole-cell FQ currents in Xenopus oocytes, reestablishing the wild-type phenotype; peak inward current at -20 mV was blocked with an IC50 of 513 microM, while plateau current was blocked with an IC50 of only 74 microM (P < 0.005 vs. peak). In single-channel experiments, mean open time was unaltered and unitary current was only reduced at higher drug concentrations, suggesting that open-channel block does not explain the effect of lidocaine on FQ plateau current. We considered a simple model in which lidocaine reduced the free energy for inactivation, causing altered coupling between activation and inactivation. This model readily simulated macroscopic Na current kinetics over a range of lidocaine concentrations. Traditional modulated receptor models which did not modify coupling between gating processes could not reproduce the effects of lidocaine with rate constants constrained by single-channel data. Our results support a reinterpretation of local anesthetic action whereby lidocaine functions as an allosteric effector to enhance Na channel inactivation.
J R Balser, H B Nuss, D W Orias, D C Johns, E Marban, G F Tomaselli, J H Lawrence
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 141 | 46 |
55 | 34 | |
Citation downloads | 48 | 0 |
Totals | 244 | 80 |
Total Views | 324 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.