Oxidative modification of LDL increases its atherogenicity, and 15-lipoxygenase (15-LO) has been implicated in the process. To address this issue, we generated transgenic rabbits that expressed 15-LO in a macrophage-specific manner and studied their susceptibility to atherosclerosis development when they were fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol (HFHC) diet (Teklad 0533 rabbit diet 7009 with 10% corn oil and 0.25% cholesterol) for 13.5 wk. Transgenic and nontransgenic rabbits developed similar degrees of hypercholesterolemia and had similar levels of triglyceride, VLDL, LDL, and HDL. Quantitative morphometric analysis of the aortic atherosclerosis indicated that the transgenic animals (n = 19) had significantly smaller lesion areas (9.8+/-6.5%, mean+/-SD) than their littermate controls (n = 14, 17.8+/-15.0%) (P < 0.05). In a subgroup (n = 9) of transgenic rabbits that received the HFHC diet plus the antioxidant N',N '-diphenyl-phenylenediamine (1%), the extent of lesion involvement (9.8+/-7.5%) did not differ from the subgroup (n = 10) that received the regular HFHC diet (9.7+/-5.9%). Since the results were unexpected, we repeated the experiments. Again, we found that the nontransgenic littermates (n = 12) had more extensive lesions (11.6+/-10.6%) than the transgenic rabbits (n = 13; 9.5+/-7.8%), although the difference was not significant. In a third set of experiments, we crossed 15-LO transgenic rabbits with Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits and found that the lesion area in the 15-LO transgenic/heterozygous WHHL rabbits (n = 14) was only about one third (7.7+/-5.7%) that found in nontransgenic heterozygous WHHL littermate controls (n = 11, 20.7+/-19.4%) (P < 0.05). These data suggest that overexpression of 15-LO in monocytes/macrophages protects against lipid deposition in the vessel wall during early atherogenesis in these rabbit models of atherosclerosis.
J Shen, E Herderick, J F Cornhill, E Zsigmond, H S Kim, H Kühn, N V Guevara, L Chan
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 541 | 45 |
50 | 20 | |
Citation downloads | 56 | 0 |
Totals | 647 | 65 |
Total Views | 712 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.