Nitric oxide (NO), a free radical that is negatively inotropic in the heart and skeletal muscle, is produced in large amounts during sepsis by an NO synthase inducible (iNOS) by LPS and/or cytokines. The aim of this study was to examine iNOS induction in the rat diaphragm after Escherichia Coli LPS inoculation (1.6 mg/kg i.p.), and its involvement in diaphragmatic contractile dysfunction. Inducible NOS protein and activity could be detected in the diaphragm as early as 6 h after LPS inoculation. 6 and 12 h after LPS, iNOS was expressed in inflammatory cells infiltrating the perivascular spaces of the diaphragm, whereas 12 and 24 h after LPS it was expressed in skeletal muscle fibers. Inducible NOS was also expressed in the left ventricular myocardium, whereas no expression was observed in the abdominal, intercostal, and peripheral skeletal muscles. Diaphragmatic force was significantly decreased 12 and 24 h after LPS. This decrease was prevented by inhibition of iNOS induction by dexamethasone or by inhibition of iNOS activity by N(G)-methyl-L-arginine. We conclude that iNOS was induced in the diaphragm after E. Coli LPS inoculation in rats, being involved in the decreased muscular force.
J Boczkowski, S Lanone, D Ungureanu-Longrois, G Danialou, T Fournier, M Aubier
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 119 | 19 |
40 | 33 | |
Citation downloads | 49 | 0 |
Totals | 208 | 52 |
Total Views | 260 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.