To determine to what extent intravenous nutrition can reduce proteolysis in very immature and normal newborns, and to assess the capacity of preterm and normal newborns to convert phenylalanine to tyrosine, phenylalanine and leucine kinetics were measured under basal conditions and during parenteral nutrition in clinically stable, extremely premature (approximately 26 wk of gestation) infants and in normal term newborns. In response to parenteral nutrition, there was significantly less suppression (P < 0.001) of endogenous leucine and phenylalanine rate of appearance in extremely premature infants compared with term infants. Phenylalanine utilization for protein synthesis during parenteral nutrition increased significantly (P < 0.01) and by the same magnitude (approximately 15%) in both extremely premature and term infants. Phenylalanine was converted to tyrosine at substantial rates in both extremely premature and term infants; however, this conversion rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in extremely premature infants during both the basal and parenteral nutrition periods. These data provide clear evidence that there is no immaturity in the phenylalanine hydroxylation pathway. Furthermore, although parenteral nutrition appears to produce similar increases in protein synthesis in extremely premature and term infants, proteolysis is suppressed much less in extremely premature newborns. The factors responsible for this apparent resistance to suppression of proteolysis in the very immature newborn remain to be elucidated.
S C Denne, C A Karn, J A Ahlrichs, A R Dorotheo, J Wang, E A Liechty
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 115 | 12 |
47 | 27 | |
Citation downloads | 57 | 0 |
Totals | 219 | 39 |
Total Views | 258 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.