We have developed a noninvasive method to estimate splanchnic glucose uptake (SGU) in humans (oral glucose clamp technique [OG-CLAMP]), which combines a hyperinsulinemic clamp with an oral glucose load (oral glucose tolerance test). We validated this method in 12 nondiabetic subjects using hepatic vein catheterization (HVC) during an oral glucose tolerance test. During HVC, splanchnic blood flow increased from 1,395 +/- 64 to 1,935 +/- 109 ml/min, returning to basal after 180 min and accounted for 45 +/- 7% of SGU in lean and 19 +/- 5% in obese subjects (P < 0.05). SGU estimated during the OG-CLAMP was 22 +/- 2% of the glucose load, and this was significantly correlated (r = 0.90, P < 0.0001) with SGU (35 +/- 4%) and with first pass SGU (24 +/- 3%; r = 0.83, P < 0.001) measured during HVC. SGU was higher in obese than in lean subjects during OG-CLAMP (27 +/- 1% vs 18 +/- 3%, P < 0.01) and HVC (44 +/- 4% vs 26 +/- 5%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, SGU during the OG-CLAMP is well correlated to SGU measured during HVC. An increase in splanchnic blood flow is a major contributor to SGU in lean subjects. SGU is increased in obese subjects as measured by both methods.
B Ludvik, J J Nolan, A Roberts, J Baloga, M Joyce, J M Bell, J M Olefsky
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 129 | 5 |
49 | 21 | |
Scanned page | 247 | 7 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 486 | 33 |
Total Views | 519 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.