Solute-free water diuretics (aquaretics) by antagonizing hydrosmotic vasopressin receptors (V2) may be useful in treating water-retaining diseases. The effects of intravenous administration of a newly developed nonpeptide, selective V2 antagonist, OPC-31260, at doses ranging from 0.017 to 1.0 mg/kg to groups of healthy, normally hydrated men were compared with those of 0.33 mg/kg furosemide and placebo. OPC-31260 increased the hypotonic urine volume dose dependently for the first 4 h, while furosemide induced sodium diuresis for 2 h. The absolute increase in the cumulative response in the urine to the highest doses of OPC-31260 was not significantly different from that to furosemide. The higher doses of OPC-31260 rapidly lowered urine osmolality for 2 h, particularly between minutes 15 and 45 (e.g., 1.0-mg/kg dose: 63 +/- 2 mOsm/kg in urine collected between minutes 30 and 45). In a marked hypotonic diuresis, mean free water clearance of the 4-h urine increased dose proportionally into the positive range, reaching 1.80 +/- 0.21 ml/min at 1.0 mg/kg. Whereas furosemide induced marked Na and K diuresis, OPC-31260 increased urinary Na excretion only slightly. At 4 h, 0.75 and 1.0 mg/kg of OPC-31260 almost doubled the plasma arginine vasopressin; and the higher doses increased plasma osmolality and plasma Na slightly, but did not alter plasma K, blood pressure, or heart rate. OPC-31260 thus safely induced a potent aquaretic effect in men.
A Ohnishi, Y Orita, R Okahara, H Fujihara, T Inoue, Y Yamamura, Y Yabuuchi, T Tanaka
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 189 | 4 |
46 | 18 | |
Scanned page | 247 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 543 | 25 |
Total Views | 568 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.