Retinal capillary nonperfusion results in neovascularization of the eye, which is restricted to the retina in less severe cases and progresses to the anterior chamber and the iris angle in the most advanced case, called rubeosis. This angioneogenesis may be induced by the release of retinal growth factors into the vitreous. This study compared levels of the IGF-I and IGF-II, and of the IGF binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) and IGFBP-3 in vitreous from three groups with different degrees of retinal ischemia, as judged by the extent of neovascularization: a control group without new vessel formation, retinal neovascularization in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and massive ischemia of various causes resulting in rubeosis. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were increased 10- and 13-fold in rubeosis (P << 0.01) compared with no ischemia (n = 10), while IGF-II and IGFBP-2 were elevated 2.7- and 4.3-fold (P < 0.01). Within the rubeosis group similar changes were observed independently of the cause of ischemia, which was central vein occlusion, ischemic ophthalmopathy, or intraocular tumor in seven cases and diabetic retinopathy in three samples from two patients. Vitreous from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy but without rubeosis (n = 16) contained 2.5- and 2.2-fold elevated levels of IGF-I and of IGFBP-2 (P < 0.05), while IGF-II and IGFBP-3 were increased 1.4- and 1.6-fold, which was not significant. We conclude that: (a) ischemia appears to be a strong stimulus for the local production of IGF-I and -II and of IGFBP-2 and -3 in the eye. (b) Changes in IGF-I and IGFBP-2 in proliferative diabetic retinopathy may be secondary to local ischemia rather than being specific for diabetic retinopathy. (c) IGF-I and IGFBP-3 may play a role in mediating angioneogenesis in the eye.
R Meyer-Schwickerath, A Pfeiffer, W F Blum, H Freyberger, M Klein, C Lösche, R Röllmann, H Schatz
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 178 | 1 |
54 | 30 | |
Scanned page | 207 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 50 | 0 |
Totals | 489 | 36 |
Total Views | 525 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.