Bradykinin stimulates diverse functions in endothelial cells including the release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF). Little is known, however, regarding the identity of the G protein(s) involved. Here we demonstrate that G proteins of the G alpha i and G alpha q family are coupled to the bradykinin receptor (BKR) in bovine aortic endothelial cells by using specific antisera directed against the COOH-terminal region of G alpha i2 (P4), G alpha i3 (EC), and G alpha q (QL). These antisera are specific since their effects are blocked by the decapeptides from which they were derived. The degree of receptor-G protein coupling was assessed by the formation of high affinity agonist binding sites (HABS) and GTP hydrolysis. In a concentration-dependent manner, the QL antisera reduced HABS and GTPase activity by 65 and 60%, respectively, and effectively abolished them in membranes from pertussis toxin-treated cells. The combination of P4 and EC antisera produced a loss of HABS (41%) and GTPase activity (40%) comparable to the effects of pertussis toxin. These findings indicate that G alpha i and G alpha q proteins mediate the cellular responses to bradykinin in bovine aortic endothelial cells and support the observation that bradykinin-stimulated EDRF release is relatively insensitive to pertussis toxin.
J K Liao, C J Homcy
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 226 | 7 |
47 | 16 | |
Scanned page | 164 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 498 | 24 |
Total Views | 522 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.