The role of thrombospondin, a multifunctional matrix glycoprotein, in platelet adhesion is controversial: both adhesive and antiadhesive properties have been attributed to this molecule. Because shear flow has a significant influence on platelet adhesion, we have assessed thrombospondin-platelet interactions both under static and flow conditions. The capacity of thrombospondin to support platelet adhesion depended upon its conformation. In a Ca(2+)-depleted conformation, such as in citrated plasma, thrombospondin was nonadhesive or antiadhesive as it inhibited platelet adhesion to fibrinogen, fibronectin, laminin, and von Willebrand factor by 30-70%. In a Ca(2+)-replete conformation, however, thrombospondin effectively supported platelet adhesion. Shear rate influenced this adhesion; percent surface coverage on thrombospondin increased from 5.4 +/- 0.3 at 0 s-1 to 41.5 +/- 6.7 at 1,600 s-1. In contrast to the extensive platelet spreading observed on fibronectin at all shear rates, platelet spreading on thrombospondin occurred only sporadically and at high shear rates. GPIa-IIa, GPIIb-IIIa, GPIV, and the vitronectin receptor, which are all proposed platelet receptors for thrombospondin, were not solely responsible for platelet adhesion to thrombospondin. These results suggest that thrombospondin may play a dual role in adhesive processes in vivo: (a) it may function in conjunction with other adhesive proteins to maintain optimal platelet adhesion at various shear rates; and (b) it may serve as a modulator of cellular adhesive functions under specific microenvironmental conditions.
F R Agbanyo, J J Sixma, P G de Groot, L R Languino, E F Plow
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 180 | 5 |
48 | 17 | |
Scanned page | 320 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 53 | 0 |
Totals | 601 | 27 |
Total Views | 628 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.