The association of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) with certain HLA alleles is well documented in pediatric patients. Whether a similar association is found in adult-on-set IDDM is not clear, although the disease occurs after the age of 20 in 50% of cases. HLA class II DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 alleles were studied in 402 type I diabetics and 405 healthy controls (all Caucasian) using oligonucleotide typing after gene amplification. Alleles DRB1*03, DRB1*04, DQB1*0201, DQB1*0302, DQA1*0301, and DQA1*0501 were indeed enriched in diabetics and the highest relative risk was observed in patients carrying both the DRB1*03-DQB1*0201 and the DRB1*0402 or DRB1*0405-DQB1*0302 haplotypes. However none of these alleles, or specific residues, could alone account for the susceptibility to IDDM. Furthermore, there were major differences in HLA class II gene profiles according to the age of onset. Patients with onset after 15 yr (n = 290) showed a significantly higher percentage of non-DR3/non-DR4 genotypes than those with childhood onset (n = 112) and a lower percentage of DR3/4 genotypes. These non-DR3/non-DR4 patients, although presenting clinically as IDDM type 1 patients, showed a lower frequency of islet cell antibodies at diagnosis and a significantly milder initial insulin deficiency. These subjects probably represent a particular subset of IDDM patients in whom frequency increases with age. The data confirm the genetic heterogeneity of IDDM and call for caution in extrapolating to adult patients the genetic concepts derived from childhood IDDM.
S Caillat-Zucman, H J Garchon, J Timsit, R Assan, C Boitard, I Djilali-Saiah, P Bougnères, J F Bach
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 393 | 7 |
79 | 25 | |
Scanned page | 359 | 24 |
Citation downloads | 60 | 0 |
Totals | 891 | 56 |
Total Views | 947 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.