The aim of the present study was to clarify whether prolonged in vitro exposure of human pancreatic islets to high glucose concentrations impairs the function of these cells. For this purpose, islets isolated from adult cadaveric organ donors were cultured for seven days in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and containing either 5.6, 11, or 28 mM glucose. There was no glucose-induced decrease in islet DNA content or signs of morphological damage. However, islets cultured at 11 or 28 mM glucose showed a 45 or 60% decrease in insulin content, as compared to islets cultured at 5.6 mM glucose. Moreover, when such islets were submitted to a 60-min stimulation with a low (1.7 mM) followed by a high (16.7 mM) concentration of glucose, the islets cultured at 5.6 mM glucose showed a higher insulin response to glucose than those of the two other groups. Islets cultured at the two higher glucose concentrations showed increased rates of insulin release in the presence of low glucose, and a failure to enhance further the release in response to an elevated glucose level. Islets cultured at 28 mM glucose showed an absolute decrease in insulin release after stimulation with 16.7 mM glucose, as compared to islets cultured at 5.6 mM glucose. The rates of glucose oxidation, proinsulin biosynthesis, and total protein biosynthesis were similar in islets cultured at 5.6 or 11 mM glucose, but they were decreased in islets cultured at 28 mM glucose. These combined results suggest that lasting exposure to high glucose concentrations impairs the function of human pancreatic islets.
D L Eizirik, G S Korbutt, C Hellerström
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 444 | 71 |
69 | 43 | |
Scanned page | 276 | 37 |
Citation downloads | 62 | 0 |
Totals | 851 | 151 |
Total Views | 1,002 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.