Although not as prevalent as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas cepacia is another opportunistic pathogen which colonizes the lungs of at least some patients with cystic fibrosis. A subgroup of these patients exhibits the "cepacia syndrome", i.e., a rapid clinical deterioration and death within one year. To investigate potential early sites of bacterial attachment, we have measured the specific binding of P. cepacia isolates from cystic fibrosis (CF) sputa to both CF and non-CF mucins purified from respiratory and intestinal secretions, respectively. As shown in microtiter binding assays, clinical isolates from 19/22 patients were found to bind to both mucins, with the highest specific binding exhibited by isolates from eight patients, seven of whom later died with the cepacia syndrome. No differences were observed in the binding capacity of the two (CF versus non-CF) mucins. Binding was specific, saturable, and not influenced by tetramethylurea, a disruptor of hydrophobic associations. Individual sugars were ineffective as hapten inhibitors, as were several lectins. Mucins treated by reduction/alkylation or chloroform/methanol extraction showed enhanced bacterial binding, findings which were attributed to exposure of underlying binding sites. Deglycosylation procedures indicated that mucin receptors for P. cepacia include N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine, probably linked together as part of core oligosaccharide structures. P. cepacia isolates also bound to buccal epithelial cells, and mucin partially inhibited the binding of those isolates of P. cepacia that also had the ability to bind to mucin. We speculate that specific binding of P. cepacia to secreted mucins may be an early step in the pathogenesis of the cepacia syndrome.
U S Sajjan, M Corey, M A Karmali, J F Forstner
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 230 | 3 |
54 | 17 | |
Figure | 0 | 2 |
Scanned page | 316 | 9 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 661 | 31 |
Total Views | 692 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.