Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 6

See more details

Referenced in 3 patents
14 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (48)

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI115390

Efficacy of antilipopolysaccharide and anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibodies in a neutropenic rat model of Pseudomonas sepsis.

S M Opal, A S Cross, J C Sadoff, H H Collins, N M Kelly, G H Victor, J E Palardy, and M W Bodmer

Infectious Disease Division, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence.

Find articles by Opal, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Infectious Disease Division, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence.

Find articles by Cross, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Infectious Disease Division, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence.

Find articles by Sadoff, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Infectious Disease Division, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence.

Find articles by Collins, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Infectious Disease Division, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence.

Find articles by Kelly, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Infectious Disease Division, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence.

Find articles by Victor, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Infectious Disease Division, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence.

Find articles by Palardy, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Infectious Disease Division, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence.

Find articles by Bodmer, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published September 1, 1991 - More info

Published in Volume 88, Issue 3 on September 1, 1991
J Clin Invest. 1991;88(3):885–890. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115390.
© 1991 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published September 1, 1991 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (MAb) directed against bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) provide partial protection in experimental models of septic shock. To determine if additional benefit accrues from a combination of anti-TNF and anti-LPS MAb in the treatment of septic shock, a neutropenic rat model was developed to study active infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa 12.4.4. Animals were treated intravenously with an irrelevant MAb (group 1); anti-TNF MAb (group 2); MAb directed against P. aeruginosa 12.4.4 LPS (group 3); or a combination of anti-TNF and anti-LPS MAb (group 4). None of the control animals in group 1 survived the 7-d period of neutropenia (0/16). In contrast, the survival rate was 44% in group 2 (P less than 0.02); 37% in group 3 (P less than 0.05); and 75% in group 4 (P less than 0.0002). The combination of monoclonal antibodies provided greater protection than either MAb given alone (P less than 0.05). Serum TNF levels during infection were significantly greater in groups 1 and 3 (20.1 +/- 3.3 U, mean +/- SE) than in groups 2 and 4 (0.9 +/- 0.8 U, P less than 0.0001). These results indicate that a combination of monoclonal antibodies to LPS and TNF have additive benefit in experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. This immunotherapeutic approach may be of potential utility in the management of serious, gram-negative bacterial infection in neutropenic patients.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 885
page 885
icon of scanned page 886
page 886
icon of scanned page 887
page 887
icon of scanned page 888
page 888
icon of scanned page 889
page 889
icon of scanned page 890
page 890
Version history
  • Version 1 (September 1, 1991): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 6
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (48)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Referenced in 3 patents
14 readers on Mendeley
See more details