Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1990;85(4):1267-1273. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114563.
Abstract
Fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry were used to analyze bile acids in the body fluids of an infant (L.C.) whose liver contained no immunoreactive peroxisomal 3-oxoacyl-CoA thiolase. The profiles were compared with those of six patients with undetectable peroxisomes (Zellweger syndrome) and two siblings (N.B. and I.B.) whose defect of peroxisomal beta-oxidation could not be localized by morphological studies of peroxisomes or by immunoblotting of peroxisomal beta-oxidation proteins. 3 alpha, 7 alpha, 12 alpha-Trihydroxy-5 beta-cholestan-26-oic acid (THCA) was present in bile and plasma of all patients. However, bile from L.C., N.B. and I.B. contained unconjugated varanic acid (3 alpha, 7 alpha, 12 alpha, 24-tetrahydroxy-5 beta-cholestan-26-oic acid) as the major C27 bile acid, whereas bile from Zellweger patients contained only small amounts of varanic acid. In the bile from L.C. two isomers of varanic acid were present; in the bile from N.B. and I.B. a single isomer predominated. L.C., N.B., and I.B. all produced bile containing small amounts of (24E)-3 alpha, 7 alpha, 12 alpha-trihydroxy-5 beta-cholest-24-en-26-oic acid [( 24E]-delta 24-THCA), its [24Z]- isomer, 3 alpha, 7 alpha, 12 alpha-trihydroxy-5 beta-cholest-23-en-26-oic acid and 3 alpha, 7 alpha, 12 alpha-trihydroxy-27-nor-5 beta-cholestan-24-one. The results provide evidence for peroxisomal pathways for cholic acid synthesis in man via THCA, delta 24-THCA and varanic acid and show that bile acid analyses can be used to diagnose peroxisomal thiolase deficiency.
Authors
P T Clayton, E Patel, A M Lawson, R A Carruthers, J Collins
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 181 | 5 |
| 37 | 15 | |
| Scanned page | 225 | 5 |
| Citation downloads | 54 | 0 |
| Totals | 497 | 25 |
| Total Views | 522 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)