The in vitro responses of T cells from 13 insulin-nonresistant and 1 immunologically insulin-resistant (IIR) type I diabetes patients to sulfated beef insulin (SBI) were analyzed. Insulin A-loop specific CD4+ T cells from these patients did not respond to SBI. After 1 yr of treatment with SBI the IIR patient's T cell and antibody responses to beef, pork, and human insulin progressed from very high to nondetectable levels. This occurred in parallel to the appearance of her insulin-specific CD8+ T cells, which inhibited the response of her A-loop-specific CD4+ T cells to insulin. A transient increase in her CD8+ anti-insulin antibody activity coincided with a relative lack of her CD8+ T cell activity. CD8+ T cells that regulate T cell responsiveness to insulin are probably present but difficult to detect in most type I diabetes patients. These T cells were identified in only 2 of 13 insulin-nonresistant patients who presented with lipoatrophy and insulin allergy, respectively, and who possessed high-titered, anti-insulin antibodies. Our data demonstrate that CD8+ T cells play an important role in controlling peripheral tolerance to insulin and may abrogate IIR in a diabetic patient treated with SBI.
P Naquet, J Ellis, A Kenshole, J W Semple, T L Delovitch
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 97 | 0 |
54 | 23 | |
Scanned page | 241 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 37 | 0 |
Totals | 429 | 24 |
Total Views | 453 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.