Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 3

See more details

Referenced in 2 patents
12 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (87)

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI114182

Vasopressin-mediated forearm vasodilation in normal humans. Evidence for a vascular vasopressin V2 receptor.

A T Hirsch, V J Dzau, J A Majzoub, and M A Creager

Division of Vascular Medicine and Atherosclerosis, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

Find articles by Hirsch, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Division of Vascular Medicine and Atherosclerosis, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

Find articles by Dzau, V. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Division of Vascular Medicine and Atherosclerosis, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

Find articles by Majzoub, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Division of Vascular Medicine and Atherosclerosis, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

Find articles by Creager, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published August 1, 1989 - More info

Published in Volume 84, Issue 2 on August 1, 1989
J Clin Invest. 1989;84(2):418–426. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114182.
© 1989 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published August 1, 1989 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a potent vasopressor and antidiuretic neurohormone. However, when administered intravenously to humans, AVP causes forearm vasodilation. This effect has been attributed to sympathetic withdrawal, secondary to AVP-induced sensitization of baroreceptors. The possibility that AVP also causes forearm vasodilation directly has not been examined. Accordingly, the direct effect of AVP was determined by studying the forearm blood flow (FBF) response to intraarterial (IA) AVP infusion (0.01-1.0 ng/kg per min). Infusion of IA AVP increased FBF (96%) in the infused arm, but not the control arm, in a dose-dependent manner. The role of specific AVP V1 receptors in mediating this FBF response was determined before and after pretreatment with a V1 antagonist (AVP-A). AVP-A alone had no effect on FBF, but coadministration of AVP and AVP-A potentiated the vasodilatory response (223%). IA infusion of the V2 agonist, 1-desamino[8-D-arginine] vasopressin, caused a dose-dependent increase in FBF. These findings suggest that AVP causes direct, dose-dependent vasodilation in the human forearm that may be mediated by V2 vasopressinergic receptors. In contrast, AVP infusion caused digital vasoconstriction that was blocked by AVP-A, whereas dDAVP did not affect digital blood flow. Thus, AVP induces regionally selective vascular effects, with concurrent forearm vasodilation and digital vasoconstriction.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 418
page 418
icon of scanned page 419
page 419
icon of scanned page 420
page 420
icon of scanned page 421
page 421
icon of scanned page 422
page 422
icon of scanned page 423
page 423
icon of scanned page 424
page 424
icon of scanned page 425
page 425
icon of scanned page 426
page 426
Version history
  • Version 1 (August 1, 1989): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 3
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (87)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Referenced in 2 patents
12 readers on Mendeley
See more details