The effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) on the cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]f) were examined in freshly immunodissected rabbit cortical collecting tubule cells using fluorescent Ca2+ indicators fura-2 and indo-1. The addition of AVP to a cell suspension resulted in a rapid and transient increase in the [Ca2+]f. The 1-deamino-8-D-AVP (dDVP), a V2 receptor agonist of AVP that stimulated adenosine 3',5' cAMP production in these cells, had no effect on [Ca2+]f and did not affect AVP-induced increase in [Ca2+]f. The AVP-induced increase in [Ca2+]f but not cAMP production was blocked by the V1 receptor antagonist, [1-(beta-mercapto-beta-beta-cyclopentamethylene propionic acid), 2-(O-methyl)tyrosine] Arg8-vasopressin. The AVP-stimulated increase in [Ca2+]f appeared to be largely due to Ca2+ release from intracellular stores as reduction of extracellular Ca2+ with EGTA had little if any effect on the AVP-induced increase in [Ca2+]f. This AVP-induced increase in [Ca2+]f was associated with an increase in inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate production and appeared to involve a guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G), since the pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin for 4-6 h inhibited this effect. Finally, measurements of [Ca2+]f in single cells suggest that only the principal cells of the collecting tubules respond to AVP with an increase in [Ca2+]f. In summary, these results demonstrate that the principal cells of the cortical collecting tubule possess two distinct receptor systems for vasopressin, the well-known V2 receptor coupled to adenylate cyclase, and a V1 receptor system that leads to the mobilization of cytosolic calcium, coupled through a pertussis toxin substrate (G protein) to a production of inositol phosphates.
M A Burnatowska-Hledin, W S Spielman
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 97 | 0 |
60 | 21 | |
Scanned page | 186 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 44 | 0 |
Totals | 387 | 23 |
Total Views | 410 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.