Cellular calcium overload figures prominently in the pathogenesis of the contractile dysfunction observed after brief periods of ischemia (myocardial stunning). Because acidosis is known to antagonize Ca influx and the intracellular binding of Ca, we reasoned that acidosis during reperfusion might prevent Ca overload and ameliorate functional recovery. We measured developed pressure (DP) and 31P-nuclear magnetic resonance spectra in 26 isovolumic Langendorff-perfused ferret hearts. After 15 min of global ischemia, hearts were reperfused either with normal solution (2 mM [Ca]o, Hepes-buffered, pH 7.4 bubbled with 100% O2; n = 6) or with acidic solutions (pH 6.6 during 0-3 min, pH 7.0 during 4-6 min) before returning to the normal perfusate (n = 7). Ventricular function after 30 min of reperfusion was much greater in the acidic group (105 +/- 5 mmHg at 2 mM [Ca]o) than in the unmodified reperfusion group (79 +/- 7 mmHg, P less than 0.001); similar differences in DP were found over a broad range of [Ca]o (0.5-5 mM, P less than 0.001) and during maximal Ca2+ activation (P less than 0.001). Intramyocardial pH (pHi) was lower in the acidic group than in the unmodified group during early reperfusion, but not at steady state. Phosphate compounds were comparable in both groups. To clarify whether the protective effect of acidosis is due to intracellular or extracellular pH, we produced selective intracellular acidosis during early reperfusion by exposure to 10 mM NH4Cl for 6 min just before ischemia (n = 6). For the first 12 min of reperfusion with NH4Cl-free solution (pH = 7.4), pHi was decreased relative to the unmodified group. Recovery of DP was practically complete, and maximal Ca2+-activated pressure was comparable to that in a nonischemic control group (n = 5). These results indicate that transient intracellular acidosis can prevent myocardial stunning, presumably owing to a reduction of Ca influx into cells and/or competition of H+ for intracellular Ca2+ binding sites during early reperfusion.
M Kitakaze, M L Weisfeldt, E Marban
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 134 | 6 |
50 | 13 | |
Scanned page | 330 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 54 | 0 |
Totals | 568 | 23 |
Total Views | 591 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.